Cargando…
Neurobiological differences in mental rotation and instrument interpretation in airline pilots
Airline pilots and similar professions require reliable spatial cognition abilities, such as mental imagery of static and moving three-dimensional objects in space. A well-known task to investigate these skills is the Shepard and Metzler mental rotation task (SMT), which is also frequently used duri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4914984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27323913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep28104 |
_version_ | 1782438621274439680 |
---|---|
author | Sladky, Ronald Stepniczka, Irene Boland, Edzard Tik, Martin Lamm, Claus Hoffmann, André Buch, Jan-Philipp Niedermeier, Dominik Field, Joris Windischberger, Christian |
author_facet | Sladky, Ronald Stepniczka, Irene Boland, Edzard Tik, Martin Lamm, Claus Hoffmann, André Buch, Jan-Philipp Niedermeier, Dominik Field, Joris Windischberger, Christian |
author_sort | Sladky, Ronald |
collection | PubMed |
description | Airline pilots and similar professions require reliable spatial cognition abilities, such as mental imagery of static and moving three-dimensional objects in space. A well-known task to investigate these skills is the Shepard and Metzler mental rotation task (SMT), which is also frequently used during pre-assessment of pilot candidates. Despite the intuitive relationship between real-life spatial cognition and SMT, several studies have challenged its predictive value. Here we report on a novel instrument interpretation task (IIT) based on a realistic attitude indicator used in modern aircrafts that was designed to bridge the gap between the abstract SMT and a cockpit environment. We investigated 18 professional airline pilots using fMRI. No significant correlation was found between SMT and IIT task accuracies. Contrasting both tasks revealed higher activation in the fusiform gyrus, angular gyrus, and medial precuneus for IIT, whereas SMT elicited significantly stronger activation in pre- and supplementary motor areas, as well as lateral precuneus and superior parietal lobe. Our results show that SMT skills per se are not sufficient to predict task accuracy during (close to) real-life instrument interpretation. While there is a substantial overlap of activation across the task conditions, we found that there are important differences between instrument interpretation and non-aviation based mental rotation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4914984 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49149842016-06-27 Neurobiological differences in mental rotation and instrument interpretation in airline pilots Sladky, Ronald Stepniczka, Irene Boland, Edzard Tik, Martin Lamm, Claus Hoffmann, André Buch, Jan-Philipp Niedermeier, Dominik Field, Joris Windischberger, Christian Sci Rep Article Airline pilots and similar professions require reliable spatial cognition abilities, such as mental imagery of static and moving three-dimensional objects in space. A well-known task to investigate these skills is the Shepard and Metzler mental rotation task (SMT), which is also frequently used during pre-assessment of pilot candidates. Despite the intuitive relationship between real-life spatial cognition and SMT, several studies have challenged its predictive value. Here we report on a novel instrument interpretation task (IIT) based on a realistic attitude indicator used in modern aircrafts that was designed to bridge the gap between the abstract SMT and a cockpit environment. We investigated 18 professional airline pilots using fMRI. No significant correlation was found between SMT and IIT task accuracies. Contrasting both tasks revealed higher activation in the fusiform gyrus, angular gyrus, and medial precuneus for IIT, whereas SMT elicited significantly stronger activation in pre- and supplementary motor areas, as well as lateral precuneus and superior parietal lobe. Our results show that SMT skills per se are not sufficient to predict task accuracy during (close to) real-life instrument interpretation. While there is a substantial overlap of activation across the task conditions, we found that there are important differences between instrument interpretation and non-aviation based mental rotation. Nature Publishing Group 2016-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4914984/ /pubmed/27323913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep28104 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Sladky, Ronald Stepniczka, Irene Boland, Edzard Tik, Martin Lamm, Claus Hoffmann, André Buch, Jan-Philipp Niedermeier, Dominik Field, Joris Windischberger, Christian Neurobiological differences in mental rotation and instrument interpretation in airline pilots |
title | Neurobiological differences in mental rotation and instrument interpretation in airline pilots |
title_full | Neurobiological differences in mental rotation and instrument interpretation in airline pilots |
title_fullStr | Neurobiological differences in mental rotation and instrument interpretation in airline pilots |
title_full_unstemmed | Neurobiological differences in mental rotation and instrument interpretation in airline pilots |
title_short | Neurobiological differences in mental rotation and instrument interpretation in airline pilots |
title_sort | neurobiological differences in mental rotation and instrument interpretation in airline pilots |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4914984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27323913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep28104 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sladkyronald neurobiologicaldifferencesinmentalrotationandinstrumentinterpretationinairlinepilots AT stepniczkairene neurobiologicaldifferencesinmentalrotationandinstrumentinterpretationinairlinepilots AT bolandedzard neurobiologicaldifferencesinmentalrotationandinstrumentinterpretationinairlinepilots AT tikmartin neurobiologicaldifferencesinmentalrotationandinstrumentinterpretationinairlinepilots AT lammclaus neurobiologicaldifferencesinmentalrotationandinstrumentinterpretationinairlinepilots AT hoffmannandre neurobiologicaldifferencesinmentalrotationandinstrumentinterpretationinairlinepilots AT buchjanphilipp neurobiologicaldifferencesinmentalrotationandinstrumentinterpretationinairlinepilots AT niedermeierdominik neurobiologicaldifferencesinmentalrotationandinstrumentinterpretationinairlinepilots AT fieldjoris neurobiologicaldifferencesinmentalrotationandinstrumentinterpretationinairlinepilots AT windischbergerchristian neurobiologicaldifferencesinmentalrotationandinstrumentinterpretationinairlinepilots |