Cargando…
Factors Affecting the Capture Efficiency of a Fume Extraction Torch for Gas Metal Arc Welding
Welding fumes are classified as Group 2B ‘possibly carcinogenic’ and this prompts to the implementation of local exhaust ventilation (LEV). The fume extraction torch with LEV integrated into the tool is the most attractive solution but its capture efficiency is often disappointing in practice. This...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4915519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27074798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mew016 |
_version_ | 1782438697547857920 |
---|---|
author | Bonthoux, Francis |
author_facet | Bonthoux, Francis |
author_sort | Bonthoux, Francis |
collection | PubMed |
description | Welding fumes are classified as Group 2B ‘possibly carcinogenic’ and this prompts to the implementation of local exhaust ventilation (LEV). The fume extraction torch with LEV integrated into the tool is the most attractive solution but its capture efficiency is often disappointing in practice. This study assesses the main parameters affecting fume capture efficiency namely the extraction flow rate, the positioning of the suction openings on the torch, the angle of inclination of the torch to the workpiece during welding, the metal transfer modes, and the welding deposition rate. The theoretical velocity induced by suction, estimated from the extraction flow rate and the position of the suction openings, is the main parameter affecting effectiveness of the device. This is the design parameter and its value should never be <0.25 m s(−1). The angle of the torch relative to the workpiece also has a great deal of influence. To improve efficiency, work station layouts need to favour positions where the torch is held with angles closer to perpendicular (<15°). Welding with high deposition rates (>1.1g s(−1)) and spray transfer leads to low capture efficiency if induced velocities are <0.5 m s(−1). The results of the study can be used in the design of integrated on-torch extraction systems and provide information for fixing system objectives. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4915519 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49155192016-06-22 Factors Affecting the Capture Efficiency of a Fume Extraction Torch for Gas Metal Arc Welding Bonthoux, Francis Ann Occup Hyg Original Article Welding fumes are classified as Group 2B ‘possibly carcinogenic’ and this prompts to the implementation of local exhaust ventilation (LEV). The fume extraction torch with LEV integrated into the tool is the most attractive solution but its capture efficiency is often disappointing in practice. This study assesses the main parameters affecting fume capture efficiency namely the extraction flow rate, the positioning of the suction openings on the torch, the angle of inclination of the torch to the workpiece during welding, the metal transfer modes, and the welding deposition rate. The theoretical velocity induced by suction, estimated from the extraction flow rate and the position of the suction openings, is the main parameter affecting effectiveness of the device. This is the design parameter and its value should never be <0.25 m s(−1). The angle of the torch relative to the workpiece also has a great deal of influence. To improve efficiency, work station layouts need to favour positions where the torch is held with angles closer to perpendicular (<15°). Welding with high deposition rates (>1.1g s(−1)) and spray transfer leads to low capture efficiency if induced velocities are <0.5 m s(−1). The results of the study can be used in the design of integrated on-torch extraction systems and provide information for fixing system objectives. Oxford University Press 2016-07 2016-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4915519/ /pubmed/27074798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mew016 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bonthoux, Francis Factors Affecting the Capture Efficiency of a Fume Extraction Torch for Gas Metal Arc Welding |
title | Factors Affecting the Capture Efficiency of a Fume Extraction Torch for Gas Metal Arc Welding |
title_full | Factors Affecting the Capture Efficiency of a Fume Extraction Torch for Gas Metal Arc Welding |
title_fullStr | Factors Affecting the Capture Efficiency of a Fume Extraction Torch for Gas Metal Arc Welding |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors Affecting the Capture Efficiency of a Fume Extraction Torch for Gas Metal Arc Welding |
title_short | Factors Affecting the Capture Efficiency of a Fume Extraction Torch for Gas Metal Arc Welding |
title_sort | factors affecting the capture efficiency of a fume extraction torch for gas metal arc welding |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4915519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27074798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mew016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bonthouxfrancis factorsaffectingthecaptureefficiencyofafumeextractiontorchforgasmetalarcwelding |