Cargando…
Evaluation of the relative biological effectiveness of spot-scanning proton irradiation in vitro
Variations in relative biological effectiveness (RBE) from a fixed value of 1.1 are critical in proton beam therapy. To date, studies estimating RBE at multiple positions relative to the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) have been predominantly performed using passive scattering methods, and limited data...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4915538/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26838131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrv101 |
_version_ | 1782438702099726336 |
---|---|
author | Maeda, Kenichiro Yasui, Hironobu Matsuura, Taeko Yamamori, Tohru Suzuki, Motofumi Nagane, Masaki Nam, Jin-Min Inanami, Osamu Shirato, Hiroki |
author_facet | Maeda, Kenichiro Yasui, Hironobu Matsuura, Taeko Yamamori, Tohru Suzuki, Motofumi Nagane, Masaki Nam, Jin-Min Inanami, Osamu Shirato, Hiroki |
author_sort | Maeda, Kenichiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | Variations in relative biological effectiveness (RBE) from a fixed value of 1.1 are critical in proton beam therapy. To date, studies estimating RBE at multiple positions relative to the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) have been predominantly performed using passive scattering methods, and limited data are available for spot-scanning beams. Thus, to investigate the RBE of spot-scanning beams, Chinese hamster fibroblast V79 cells were irradiated using the beam line at the Hokkaido University Hospital Proton Therapy Center. Cells were placed at six different depths, including the entrance of the proton beam and the proximal and distal part of the SOBP. Surviving cell fractions were analyzed using colony formation assay, and cell survival curves were obtained by the curve fitted using a linear–quadratic model. RBE(10) and RBE(37) were 1.15 and 1.21 at the center of the SOBP, respectively. In contrast, the distal region showed higher RBE values (1.50 for RBE(10) and 1.85 for RBE(37)). These results are in line with those of previous studies conducted using passive scattering proton beams. Taken together, these data strongly suggest that variations in RBE should be considered during treatment planning for spot-scanning beams as well as for passive scattering proton beams. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4915538 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49155382016-06-22 Evaluation of the relative biological effectiveness of spot-scanning proton irradiation in vitro Maeda, Kenichiro Yasui, Hironobu Matsuura, Taeko Yamamori, Tohru Suzuki, Motofumi Nagane, Masaki Nam, Jin-Min Inanami, Osamu Shirato, Hiroki J Radiat Res Short Communication Variations in relative biological effectiveness (RBE) from a fixed value of 1.1 are critical in proton beam therapy. To date, studies estimating RBE at multiple positions relative to the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) have been predominantly performed using passive scattering methods, and limited data are available for spot-scanning beams. Thus, to investigate the RBE of spot-scanning beams, Chinese hamster fibroblast V79 cells were irradiated using the beam line at the Hokkaido University Hospital Proton Therapy Center. Cells were placed at six different depths, including the entrance of the proton beam and the proximal and distal part of the SOBP. Surviving cell fractions were analyzed using colony formation assay, and cell survival curves were obtained by the curve fitted using a linear–quadratic model. RBE(10) and RBE(37) were 1.15 and 1.21 at the center of the SOBP, respectively. In contrast, the distal region showed higher RBE values (1.50 for RBE(10) and 1.85 for RBE(37)). These results are in line with those of previous studies conducted using passive scattering proton beams. Taken together, these data strongly suggest that variations in RBE should be considered during treatment planning for spot-scanning beams as well as for passive scattering proton beams. Oxford University Press 2016-06 2016-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4915538/ /pubmed/26838131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrv101 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Maeda, Kenichiro Yasui, Hironobu Matsuura, Taeko Yamamori, Tohru Suzuki, Motofumi Nagane, Masaki Nam, Jin-Min Inanami, Osamu Shirato, Hiroki Evaluation of the relative biological effectiveness of spot-scanning proton irradiation in vitro |
title | Evaluation of the relative biological effectiveness of spot-scanning proton irradiation in vitro |
title_full | Evaluation of the relative biological effectiveness of spot-scanning proton irradiation in vitro |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the relative biological effectiveness of spot-scanning proton irradiation in vitro |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the relative biological effectiveness of spot-scanning proton irradiation in vitro |
title_short | Evaluation of the relative biological effectiveness of spot-scanning proton irradiation in vitro |
title_sort | evaluation of the relative biological effectiveness of spot-scanning proton irradiation in vitro |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4915538/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26838131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrv101 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maedakenichiro evaluationoftherelativebiologicaleffectivenessofspotscanningprotonirradiationinvitro AT yasuihironobu evaluationoftherelativebiologicaleffectivenessofspotscanningprotonirradiationinvitro AT matsuurataeko evaluationoftherelativebiologicaleffectivenessofspotscanningprotonirradiationinvitro AT yamamoritohru evaluationoftherelativebiologicaleffectivenessofspotscanningprotonirradiationinvitro AT suzukimotofumi evaluationoftherelativebiologicaleffectivenessofspotscanningprotonirradiationinvitro AT naganemasaki evaluationoftherelativebiologicaleffectivenessofspotscanningprotonirradiationinvitro AT namjinmin evaluationoftherelativebiologicaleffectivenessofspotscanningprotonirradiationinvitro AT inanamiosamu evaluationoftherelativebiologicaleffectivenessofspotscanningprotonirradiationinvitro AT shiratohiroki evaluationoftherelativebiologicaleffectivenessofspotscanningprotonirradiationinvitro |