Cargando…

Comparison Between Posterior Short-segment Instrumentation Combined With Lateral-approach Interbody Fusion and Traditional Wide-open Anterior-Posterior Surgery for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures

The aim of the study was to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes between posterior short-segment pedicle instrumentation combined with lateral-approach interbody fusion and traditional anterior-posterior (AP) surgery for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. Lateral-approach interbody...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Xiang, Zhang, Junwei, Tang, Hehu, Lu, Zhen, Liu, Shujia, Chen, Shizheng, Hong, Yi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4915901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26554800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001946
_version_ 1782438753888894976
author Li, Xiang
Zhang, Junwei
Tang, Hehu
Lu, Zhen
Liu, Shujia
Chen, Shizheng
Hong, Yi
author_facet Li, Xiang
Zhang, Junwei
Tang, Hehu
Lu, Zhen
Liu, Shujia
Chen, Shizheng
Hong, Yi
author_sort Li, Xiang
collection PubMed
description The aim of the study was to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes between posterior short-segment pedicle instrumentation combined with lateral-approach interbody fusion and traditional anterior-posterior (AP) surgery for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. Lateral-approach interbody fusion has achieved satisfactory results for thoracic and lumbar degenerative disease. However, few studies have focused on the use of this technique for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were established. All patients who meet the above criteria were prospectively treated by posterior short-segment instrumentation and secondary-staged minimally invasive lateral-approach interbody fusion, and classified as group A. A historical group of patients who were treated by traditional wide-open AP approach was used as a control group and classified as group B. The radiological and clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. There were 12 patients in group A and 18 patients in group B. The mean operative time and intraoperative blood loss of anterior reconstruction were significantly higher in group B than those in group A (127.1 ± 21.7 vs 197.5 ± 47.7 min, P < 0.01; 185.8 ± 62.3 vs 495 ± 347.4 mL, P < 0.01). Two of the 12 (16.7%) patients in group A experienced 2 surgical complications: 1 (8.3%) major and 1 (8.3%) minor. Six of the 18 (33%) patients in group B experienced 9 surgical complications: 3 (16.7%) major and 6 (33.3%) minor. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding loss of correction (4.3 ± 2.1 vs 4.2 ± 2.4, P = 0.89) and neurological function at final follow-up (P = 0.77). In both groups, no case of instrumentation failure, pseudarthrosis, or nonunion was noted. Compared with the wide-open AP surgery, posterior short-segment pedicle instrumentation, combined with minimally invasive lateral-approach interbody fusion, can achieve similar clinical results with significant less operative time, blood loss, and surgical complication. This procedure seems to be a reasonable treatment option for selective patients with thoracolumbar fractures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4915901
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49159012016-07-05 Comparison Between Posterior Short-segment Instrumentation Combined With Lateral-approach Interbody Fusion and Traditional Wide-open Anterior-Posterior Surgery for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures Li, Xiang Zhang, Junwei Tang, Hehu Lu, Zhen Liu, Shujia Chen, Shizheng Hong, Yi Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 The aim of the study was to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes between posterior short-segment pedicle instrumentation combined with lateral-approach interbody fusion and traditional anterior-posterior (AP) surgery for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. Lateral-approach interbody fusion has achieved satisfactory results for thoracic and lumbar degenerative disease. However, few studies have focused on the use of this technique for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were established. All patients who meet the above criteria were prospectively treated by posterior short-segment instrumentation and secondary-staged minimally invasive lateral-approach interbody fusion, and classified as group A. A historical group of patients who were treated by traditional wide-open AP approach was used as a control group and classified as group B. The radiological and clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. There were 12 patients in group A and 18 patients in group B. The mean operative time and intraoperative blood loss of anterior reconstruction were significantly higher in group B than those in group A (127.1 ± 21.7 vs 197.5 ± 47.7 min, P < 0.01; 185.8 ± 62.3 vs 495 ± 347.4 mL, P < 0.01). Two of the 12 (16.7%) patients in group A experienced 2 surgical complications: 1 (8.3%) major and 1 (8.3%) minor. Six of the 18 (33%) patients in group B experienced 9 surgical complications: 3 (16.7%) major and 6 (33.3%) minor. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding loss of correction (4.3 ± 2.1 vs 4.2 ± 2.4, P = 0.89) and neurological function at final follow-up (P = 0.77). In both groups, no case of instrumentation failure, pseudarthrosis, or nonunion was noted. Compared with the wide-open AP surgery, posterior short-segment pedicle instrumentation, combined with minimally invasive lateral-approach interbody fusion, can achieve similar clinical results with significant less operative time, blood loss, and surgical complication. This procedure seems to be a reasonable treatment option for selective patients with thoracolumbar fractures. Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4915901/ /pubmed/26554800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001946 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives License 4.0, which allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0
spellingShingle 7100
Li, Xiang
Zhang, Junwei
Tang, Hehu
Lu, Zhen
Liu, Shujia
Chen, Shizheng
Hong, Yi
Comparison Between Posterior Short-segment Instrumentation Combined With Lateral-approach Interbody Fusion and Traditional Wide-open Anterior-Posterior Surgery for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures
title Comparison Between Posterior Short-segment Instrumentation Combined With Lateral-approach Interbody Fusion and Traditional Wide-open Anterior-Posterior Surgery for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures
title_full Comparison Between Posterior Short-segment Instrumentation Combined With Lateral-approach Interbody Fusion and Traditional Wide-open Anterior-Posterior Surgery for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures
title_fullStr Comparison Between Posterior Short-segment Instrumentation Combined With Lateral-approach Interbody Fusion and Traditional Wide-open Anterior-Posterior Surgery for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures
title_full_unstemmed Comparison Between Posterior Short-segment Instrumentation Combined With Lateral-approach Interbody Fusion and Traditional Wide-open Anterior-Posterior Surgery for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures
title_short Comparison Between Posterior Short-segment Instrumentation Combined With Lateral-approach Interbody Fusion and Traditional Wide-open Anterior-Posterior Surgery for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures
title_sort comparison between posterior short-segment instrumentation combined with lateral-approach interbody fusion and traditional wide-open anterior-posterior surgery for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4915901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26554800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001946
work_keys_str_mv AT lixiang comparisonbetweenposteriorshortsegmentinstrumentationcombinedwithlateralapproachinterbodyfusionandtraditionalwideopenanteriorposteriorsurgeryforthetreatmentofthoracolumbarfractures
AT zhangjunwei comparisonbetweenposteriorshortsegmentinstrumentationcombinedwithlateralapproachinterbodyfusionandtraditionalwideopenanteriorposteriorsurgeryforthetreatmentofthoracolumbarfractures
AT tanghehu comparisonbetweenposteriorshortsegmentinstrumentationcombinedwithlateralapproachinterbodyfusionandtraditionalwideopenanteriorposteriorsurgeryforthetreatmentofthoracolumbarfractures
AT luzhen comparisonbetweenposteriorshortsegmentinstrumentationcombinedwithlateralapproachinterbodyfusionandtraditionalwideopenanteriorposteriorsurgeryforthetreatmentofthoracolumbarfractures
AT liushujia comparisonbetweenposteriorshortsegmentinstrumentationcombinedwithlateralapproachinterbodyfusionandtraditionalwideopenanteriorposteriorsurgeryforthetreatmentofthoracolumbarfractures
AT chenshizheng comparisonbetweenposteriorshortsegmentinstrumentationcombinedwithlateralapproachinterbodyfusionandtraditionalwideopenanteriorposteriorsurgeryforthetreatmentofthoracolumbarfractures
AT hongyi comparisonbetweenposteriorshortsegmentinstrumentationcombinedwithlateralapproachinterbodyfusionandtraditionalwideopenanteriorposteriorsurgeryforthetreatmentofthoracolumbarfractures