Cargando…

Modified urethrovesical anastomosis during robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: Technique and results

BACKGROUND: Despite significant developments in transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia, simple prostatectomy remains an excellent option for patients with severely enlarged glands. The objective is to describe our results of robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) with a modified...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Castillo, Octavio, Vidal-Mora, Ivar, Rodriguez-Carlin, Arquimedes, Silva, Andres, Schatloff, Oscar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian Pacific Prostate Society 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4916064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27358846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2016.04.001
_version_ 1782438767377776640
author Castillo, Octavio
Vidal-Mora, Ivar
Rodriguez-Carlin, Arquimedes
Silva, Andres
Schatloff, Oscar
author_facet Castillo, Octavio
Vidal-Mora, Ivar
Rodriguez-Carlin, Arquimedes
Silva, Andres
Schatloff, Oscar
author_sort Castillo, Octavio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite significant developments in transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia, simple prostatectomy remains an excellent option for patients with severely enlarged glands. The objective is to describe our results of robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) with a modified urethrovesical anastomosis (UVA). METHODS: From May 2011 to February 2014, RASP with UVA was performed in 34 patients by a single surgeon (O.C.) using the da Vinci S-HD surgical system. The UVA was performed between the bladder neck and urethral margin using the Van Velthoven technique. Demographic, perioperative, and outcome data were recorded. Complications were recorded with the Clavien–Dindo system. RESULTS: The mean (standard deviation) age was 68 years (62–74 years). The median preoperative prostate volume (interquartile range) was 117 cc (99–146 cc). Operative time was 96 minutes (78–126 minutes), estimate blood loss was 200 mL (100–300 mL), and two (5.8%) patients required a blood transfusion. No conversion to open surgery was needed. The median specimen weight on pathological examination was 76 g (58–100 g). The average hospital stay was 2.2 days (1–4 days) and average Foley catheter time was 4.6 days (4–6 days). No intraoperative complications were recorded. There were seven (20.5%) postoperative complications, most of them Clavien less than or equal to Grade II. CONCLUSION: The results of our study show that RASP with UVA is a feasible, secure, and reproducible procedure with low morbidity. Additional series with larger patient cohorts are needed to validate this approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4916064
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Asian Pacific Prostate Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49160642016-06-29 Modified urethrovesical anastomosis during robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: Technique and results Castillo, Octavio Vidal-Mora, Ivar Rodriguez-Carlin, Arquimedes Silva, Andres Schatloff, Oscar Prostate Int Original Article BACKGROUND: Despite significant developments in transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia, simple prostatectomy remains an excellent option for patients with severely enlarged glands. The objective is to describe our results of robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) with a modified urethrovesical anastomosis (UVA). METHODS: From May 2011 to February 2014, RASP with UVA was performed in 34 patients by a single surgeon (O.C.) using the da Vinci S-HD surgical system. The UVA was performed between the bladder neck and urethral margin using the Van Velthoven technique. Demographic, perioperative, and outcome data were recorded. Complications were recorded with the Clavien–Dindo system. RESULTS: The mean (standard deviation) age was 68 years (62–74 years). The median preoperative prostate volume (interquartile range) was 117 cc (99–146 cc). Operative time was 96 minutes (78–126 minutes), estimate blood loss was 200 mL (100–300 mL), and two (5.8%) patients required a blood transfusion. No conversion to open surgery was needed. The median specimen weight on pathological examination was 76 g (58–100 g). The average hospital stay was 2.2 days (1–4 days) and average Foley catheter time was 4.6 days (4–6 days). No intraoperative complications were recorded. There were seven (20.5%) postoperative complications, most of them Clavien less than or equal to Grade II. CONCLUSION: The results of our study show that RASP with UVA is a feasible, secure, and reproducible procedure with low morbidity. Additional series with larger patient cohorts are needed to validate this approach. Asian Pacific Prostate Society 2016-06 2016-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4916064/ /pubmed/27358846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2016.04.001 Text en © 2016 Asian Pacific Prostate Society, Published by Elsevier. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Castillo, Octavio
Vidal-Mora, Ivar
Rodriguez-Carlin, Arquimedes
Silva, Andres
Schatloff, Oscar
Modified urethrovesical anastomosis during robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: Technique and results
title Modified urethrovesical anastomosis during robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: Technique and results
title_full Modified urethrovesical anastomosis during robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: Technique and results
title_fullStr Modified urethrovesical anastomosis during robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: Technique and results
title_full_unstemmed Modified urethrovesical anastomosis during robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: Technique and results
title_short Modified urethrovesical anastomosis during robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: Technique and results
title_sort modified urethrovesical anastomosis during robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: technique and results
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4916064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27358846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2016.04.001
work_keys_str_mv AT castillooctavio modifiedurethrovesicalanastomosisduringrobotassistedsimpleprostatectomytechniqueandresults
AT vidalmoraivar modifiedurethrovesicalanastomosisduringrobotassistedsimpleprostatectomytechniqueandresults
AT rodriguezcarlinarquimedes modifiedurethrovesicalanastomosisduringrobotassistedsimpleprostatectomytechniqueandresults
AT silvaandres modifiedurethrovesicalanastomosisduringrobotassistedsimpleprostatectomytechniqueandresults
AT schatloffoscar modifiedurethrovesicalanastomosisduringrobotassistedsimpleprostatectomytechniqueandresults