Cargando…

Representative sampling of natural biofilms: influence of substratum type on the bacterial and fungal communities structure

In situ biofilm sampling is a key step for the study of natural biofilms and using methodologies that reflect natural diversity is necessary to guarantee representative sampling. Here, we focalise on the impact of the type of substrata on which biofilms grow on bacterial and fungal communities’ stru...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hellal, Jennifer, Michel, Caroline, Barsotti, Vanessa, Laperche, Valérie, Garrido, Francis, Joulian, Catherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4916114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27390662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2448-2
_version_ 1782438774393798656
author Hellal, Jennifer
Michel, Caroline
Barsotti, Vanessa
Laperche, Valérie
Garrido, Francis
Joulian, Catherine
author_facet Hellal, Jennifer
Michel, Caroline
Barsotti, Vanessa
Laperche, Valérie
Garrido, Francis
Joulian, Catherine
author_sort Hellal, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description In situ biofilm sampling is a key step for the study of natural biofilms and using methodologies that reflect natural diversity is necessary to guarantee representative sampling. Here, we focalise on the impact of the type of substrata on which biofilms grow on bacterial and fungal communities’ structure. The indirect molecular approach, Denaturing Gel Gradient Electrophoresis (DGGE) of a gene fragment coding for either 16S rRNA or 28S rRNA, for bacteria or fungi respectively, was used to evaluate the variability of microbial community structures among different biofilm substrata: natural (pebbles, live plants, wood and sediment), or artificial (glass, Plexiglas(®) and sterile wood), in a small river (the Loiret, France). Multivariate statistics, band richness and diversity indexes (Shannon and Simpson) were used to highlight variations in community structure between substrata. Results showed variations of bacterial and fungal diversity between different substrata according to substratum properties/origin (natural or artificial, organic or inorganic) but there was no optimal substratum for sampling, and artificial substrata were not significantly less applicable than natural substrata. Pooling 4 different substrata types allowed a higher bacterial and fungal biodiversity recovery. Point contact sampling may thus gain in robustness by increasing the number of substrata considered. Fungal species richness was similar to the bacterial one on most substrata which suggested they should be more frequently considered in riverine biofilm studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4916114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49161142016-07-07 Representative sampling of natural biofilms: influence of substratum type on the bacterial and fungal communities structure Hellal, Jennifer Michel, Caroline Barsotti, Vanessa Laperche, Valérie Garrido, Francis Joulian, Catherine Springerplus Research In situ biofilm sampling is a key step for the study of natural biofilms and using methodologies that reflect natural diversity is necessary to guarantee representative sampling. Here, we focalise on the impact of the type of substrata on which biofilms grow on bacterial and fungal communities’ structure. The indirect molecular approach, Denaturing Gel Gradient Electrophoresis (DGGE) of a gene fragment coding for either 16S rRNA or 28S rRNA, for bacteria or fungi respectively, was used to evaluate the variability of microbial community structures among different biofilm substrata: natural (pebbles, live plants, wood and sediment), or artificial (glass, Plexiglas(®) and sterile wood), in a small river (the Loiret, France). Multivariate statistics, band richness and diversity indexes (Shannon and Simpson) were used to highlight variations in community structure between substrata. Results showed variations of bacterial and fungal diversity between different substrata according to substratum properties/origin (natural or artificial, organic or inorganic) but there was no optimal substratum for sampling, and artificial substrata were not significantly less applicable than natural substrata. Pooling 4 different substrata types allowed a higher bacterial and fungal biodiversity recovery. Point contact sampling may thus gain in robustness by increasing the number of substrata considered. Fungal species richness was similar to the bacterial one on most substrata which suggested they should be more frequently considered in riverine biofilm studies. Springer International Publishing 2016-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4916114/ /pubmed/27390662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2448-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Hellal, Jennifer
Michel, Caroline
Barsotti, Vanessa
Laperche, Valérie
Garrido, Francis
Joulian, Catherine
Representative sampling of natural biofilms: influence of substratum type on the bacterial and fungal communities structure
title Representative sampling of natural biofilms: influence of substratum type on the bacterial and fungal communities structure
title_full Representative sampling of natural biofilms: influence of substratum type on the bacterial and fungal communities structure
title_fullStr Representative sampling of natural biofilms: influence of substratum type on the bacterial and fungal communities structure
title_full_unstemmed Representative sampling of natural biofilms: influence of substratum type on the bacterial and fungal communities structure
title_short Representative sampling of natural biofilms: influence of substratum type on the bacterial and fungal communities structure
title_sort representative sampling of natural biofilms: influence of substratum type on the bacterial and fungal communities structure
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4916114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27390662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2448-2
work_keys_str_mv AT hellaljennifer representativesamplingofnaturalbiofilmsinfluenceofsubstratumtypeonthebacterialandfungalcommunitiesstructure
AT michelcaroline representativesamplingofnaturalbiofilmsinfluenceofsubstratumtypeonthebacterialandfungalcommunitiesstructure
AT barsottivanessa representativesamplingofnaturalbiofilmsinfluenceofsubstratumtypeonthebacterialandfungalcommunitiesstructure
AT laperchevalerie representativesamplingofnaturalbiofilmsinfluenceofsubstratumtypeonthebacterialandfungalcommunitiesstructure
AT garridofrancis representativesamplingofnaturalbiofilmsinfluenceofsubstratumtypeonthebacterialandfungalcommunitiesstructure
AT jouliancatherine representativesamplingofnaturalbiofilmsinfluenceofsubstratumtypeonthebacterialandfungalcommunitiesstructure