Cargando…

Differences in Central Corneal Thickness between Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Patients with Dry Eye Disease

Purpose. To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) values via Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) and ultrasonic pachymetry in patients with severe dry eye disease (DED) to determine the level of agreement between these 2 methods. Methods. The paired samples t-test was used to com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Celebi, Ali Riza Cenk, Mirza, G. Ertugrul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4916283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27375899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2623719
_version_ 1782438803567280128
author Celebi, Ali Riza Cenk
Mirza, G. Ertugrul
author_facet Celebi, Ali Riza Cenk
Mirza, G. Ertugrul
author_sort Celebi, Ali Riza Cenk
collection PubMed
description Purpose. To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) values via Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) and ultrasonic pachymetry in patients with severe dry eye disease (DED) to determine the level of agreement between these 2 methods. Methods. The paired samples t-test was used to compare CCT values in severe DED patients. Matching analysis between methods was performed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Intrasession reliability of the measurement methods was calculated via the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), variation equivalent, and Pearson's correlation coefficient. The Bland-Altman procedure was used to graphically represent the differences between CCT values. Results. The study included 56 eyes of 24 female and 4 male patients. Mean age of the patients was 50.9 ± 11.3 years. Mean CCT via Cirrus SD-OCT was 523.82 ± 30.98 μm versus 530.050 ± 31.85 μm via ultrasonic pachymetry (paired samples t-test, P < 0.001). The Bland-Altman plot showed good agreement between the examiners. The ICC for repeatability was 0.974. The CCC between the 2 methods' CCT values was 0.973. The variation equivalent was 0.976 and Pearson's correlation coefficient was 99.3%, which also indicated high correlation between the 2 methods' measurements. Conclusions. The present findings show that in patients with severe DED Cirrus SD-OCT provides reliable intraobserver CCT values.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4916283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49162832016-07-03 Differences in Central Corneal Thickness between Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Patients with Dry Eye Disease Celebi, Ali Riza Cenk Mirza, G. Ertugrul J Ophthalmol Research Article Purpose. To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) values via Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) and ultrasonic pachymetry in patients with severe dry eye disease (DED) to determine the level of agreement between these 2 methods. Methods. The paired samples t-test was used to compare CCT values in severe DED patients. Matching analysis between methods was performed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Intrasession reliability of the measurement methods was calculated via the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), variation equivalent, and Pearson's correlation coefficient. The Bland-Altman procedure was used to graphically represent the differences between CCT values. Results. The study included 56 eyes of 24 female and 4 male patients. Mean age of the patients was 50.9 ± 11.3 years. Mean CCT via Cirrus SD-OCT was 523.82 ± 30.98 μm versus 530.050 ± 31.85 μm via ultrasonic pachymetry (paired samples t-test, P < 0.001). The Bland-Altman plot showed good agreement between the examiners. The ICC for repeatability was 0.974. The CCC between the 2 methods' CCT values was 0.973. The variation equivalent was 0.976 and Pearson's correlation coefficient was 99.3%, which also indicated high correlation between the 2 methods' measurements. Conclusions. The present findings show that in patients with severe DED Cirrus SD-OCT provides reliable intraobserver CCT values. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4916283/ /pubmed/27375899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2623719 Text en Copyright © 2016 A. R. C. Celebi and G. E. Mirza. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Celebi, Ali Riza Cenk
Mirza, G. Ertugrul
Differences in Central Corneal Thickness between Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Patients with Dry Eye Disease
title Differences in Central Corneal Thickness between Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Patients with Dry Eye Disease
title_full Differences in Central Corneal Thickness between Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Patients with Dry Eye Disease
title_fullStr Differences in Central Corneal Thickness between Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Patients with Dry Eye Disease
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Central Corneal Thickness between Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Patients with Dry Eye Disease
title_short Differences in Central Corneal Thickness between Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Patients with Dry Eye Disease
title_sort differences in central corneal thickness between spectral domain-optical coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry in patients with dry eye disease
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4916283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27375899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2623719
work_keys_str_mv AT celebialirizacenk differencesincentralcornealthicknessbetweenspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyandultrasoundpachymetryinpatientswithdryeyedisease
AT mirzagertugrul differencesincentralcornealthicknessbetweenspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyandultrasoundpachymetryinpatientswithdryeyedisease