Cargando…
Is selective prenatal iron prophylaxis better than routine prophylaxis: final results of a trial (PROFEG) in Maputo, Mozambique
OBJECTIVE: To compare routine versus selective (ie, screening and treatment for anaemia) prenatal iron prophylaxis in a malaria-endemic and HIV-prevalent setting, an extended analysis including previously missing data. DESIGN: A pragmatic randomised controlled clinical trial. SETTING: 2 health centr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4916582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27297013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011280 |
_version_ | 1782438853207916544 |
---|---|
author | Hemminki, Elina Nwaru, Bright I Salomé, Graca Parkkali, Saara Abacassamo, Fatima Augusto, Orvalho Cliff, Julie Regushevskaya, Elena Dgedge, Martinho Sousa, Cesar Chilundo, Baltazar |
author_facet | Hemminki, Elina Nwaru, Bright I Salomé, Graca Parkkali, Saara Abacassamo, Fatima Augusto, Orvalho Cliff, Julie Regushevskaya, Elena Dgedge, Martinho Sousa, Cesar Chilundo, Baltazar |
author_sort | Hemminki, Elina |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare routine versus selective (ie, screening and treatment for anaemia) prenatal iron prophylaxis in a malaria-endemic and HIV-prevalent setting, an extended analysis including previously missing data. DESIGN: A pragmatic randomised controlled clinical trial. SETTING: 2 health centres in Maputo, Mozambique. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women (≥18 years old; non-high-risk pregnancy) were randomly allocated to routine iron (n=2184) and selective iron (n=2142) groups. INTERVENTIONS: In the routine group, women received 60 mg ferrous sulfate plus 400 μg folic acid daily. In the selective group, women received 1 mg of folic acid daily and haemoglobin (Hb) screening at each visit; with low Hb (cut-off 9 g/dL) treatment (120 mg+800 μg of folic acid daily) for a month. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes: preterm birth, low birth weight; secondary outcomes: self-reported malaria, labour complications, caesarean section, perinatal death, woman's death. Nurses collected pregnancy data. Birth data were abstracted from hospital records for 52% of women and traced using various methods and linked with probabilistic matching for 24%. Women's deaths were collected from death registers. RESULTS: Birth data were available for 3301 (76%) of the women. Outcomes were similar in the two groups: preterm births (27.1% in the selective vs 25.3% in the routine group), low birthweight infants (11.0% vs 11.7%), perinatal deaths (2.4% vs 2.4%) and caesarean sections (4.0% vs 4.5%). Women's deaths during pregnancy or <42 days postpartum were more common in the selective group (0.8% among the two best matched women) than in the routine group (0.4%). Extra deaths could not be explained by the cause of death, Hb level or HIV status at recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: Birth outcomes were similar in the two iron groups. There might have been more women's deaths in the selective iron group, but it is unclear whether this was due to the intervention, other factors or chance finding. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00488579. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4916582 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49165822016-06-24 Is selective prenatal iron prophylaxis better than routine prophylaxis: final results of a trial (PROFEG) in Maputo, Mozambique Hemminki, Elina Nwaru, Bright I Salomé, Graca Parkkali, Saara Abacassamo, Fatima Augusto, Orvalho Cliff, Julie Regushevskaya, Elena Dgedge, Martinho Sousa, Cesar Chilundo, Baltazar BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To compare routine versus selective (ie, screening and treatment for anaemia) prenatal iron prophylaxis in a malaria-endemic and HIV-prevalent setting, an extended analysis including previously missing data. DESIGN: A pragmatic randomised controlled clinical trial. SETTING: 2 health centres in Maputo, Mozambique. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women (≥18 years old; non-high-risk pregnancy) were randomly allocated to routine iron (n=2184) and selective iron (n=2142) groups. INTERVENTIONS: In the routine group, women received 60 mg ferrous sulfate plus 400 μg folic acid daily. In the selective group, women received 1 mg of folic acid daily and haemoglobin (Hb) screening at each visit; with low Hb (cut-off 9 g/dL) treatment (120 mg+800 μg of folic acid daily) for a month. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes: preterm birth, low birth weight; secondary outcomes: self-reported malaria, labour complications, caesarean section, perinatal death, woman's death. Nurses collected pregnancy data. Birth data were abstracted from hospital records for 52% of women and traced using various methods and linked with probabilistic matching for 24%. Women's deaths were collected from death registers. RESULTS: Birth data were available for 3301 (76%) of the women. Outcomes were similar in the two groups: preterm births (27.1% in the selective vs 25.3% in the routine group), low birthweight infants (11.0% vs 11.7%), perinatal deaths (2.4% vs 2.4%) and caesarean sections (4.0% vs 4.5%). Women's deaths during pregnancy or <42 days postpartum were more common in the selective group (0.8% among the two best matched women) than in the routine group (0.4%). Extra deaths could not be explained by the cause of death, Hb level or HIV status at recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: Birth outcomes were similar in the two iron groups. There might have been more women's deaths in the selective iron group, but it is unclear whether this was due to the intervention, other factors or chance finding. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00488579. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4916582/ /pubmed/27297013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011280 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Hemminki, Elina Nwaru, Bright I Salomé, Graca Parkkali, Saara Abacassamo, Fatima Augusto, Orvalho Cliff, Julie Regushevskaya, Elena Dgedge, Martinho Sousa, Cesar Chilundo, Baltazar Is selective prenatal iron prophylaxis better than routine prophylaxis: final results of a trial (PROFEG) in Maputo, Mozambique |
title | Is selective prenatal iron prophylaxis better than routine prophylaxis: final results of a trial (PROFEG) in Maputo, Mozambique |
title_full | Is selective prenatal iron prophylaxis better than routine prophylaxis: final results of a trial (PROFEG) in Maputo, Mozambique |
title_fullStr | Is selective prenatal iron prophylaxis better than routine prophylaxis: final results of a trial (PROFEG) in Maputo, Mozambique |
title_full_unstemmed | Is selective prenatal iron prophylaxis better than routine prophylaxis: final results of a trial (PROFEG) in Maputo, Mozambique |
title_short | Is selective prenatal iron prophylaxis better than routine prophylaxis: final results of a trial (PROFEG) in Maputo, Mozambique |
title_sort | is selective prenatal iron prophylaxis better than routine prophylaxis: final results of a trial (profeg) in maputo, mozambique |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4916582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27297013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011280 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hemminkielina isselectiveprenatalironprophylaxisbetterthanroutineprophylaxisfinalresultsofatrialprofeginmaputomozambique AT nwarubrighti isselectiveprenatalironprophylaxisbetterthanroutineprophylaxisfinalresultsofatrialprofeginmaputomozambique AT salomegraca isselectiveprenatalironprophylaxisbetterthanroutineprophylaxisfinalresultsofatrialprofeginmaputomozambique AT parkkalisaara isselectiveprenatalironprophylaxisbetterthanroutineprophylaxisfinalresultsofatrialprofeginmaputomozambique AT abacassamofatima isselectiveprenatalironprophylaxisbetterthanroutineprophylaxisfinalresultsofatrialprofeginmaputomozambique AT augustoorvalho isselectiveprenatalironprophylaxisbetterthanroutineprophylaxisfinalresultsofatrialprofeginmaputomozambique AT cliffjulie isselectiveprenatalironprophylaxisbetterthanroutineprophylaxisfinalresultsofatrialprofeginmaputomozambique AT regushevskayaelena isselectiveprenatalironprophylaxisbetterthanroutineprophylaxisfinalresultsofatrialprofeginmaputomozambique AT dgedgemartinho isselectiveprenatalironprophylaxisbetterthanroutineprophylaxisfinalresultsofatrialprofeginmaputomozambique AT sousacesar isselectiveprenatalironprophylaxisbetterthanroutineprophylaxisfinalresultsofatrialprofeginmaputomozambique AT chilundobaltazar isselectiveprenatalironprophylaxisbetterthanroutineprophylaxisfinalresultsofatrialprofeginmaputomozambique |