Cargando…

Is selective prenatal iron prophylaxis better than routine prophylaxis: final results of a trial (PROFEG) in Maputo, Mozambique

OBJECTIVE: To compare routine versus selective (ie, screening and treatment for anaemia) prenatal iron prophylaxis in a malaria-endemic and HIV-prevalent setting, an extended analysis including previously missing data. DESIGN: A pragmatic randomised controlled clinical trial. SETTING: 2 health centr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hemminki, Elina, Nwaru, Bright I, Salomé, Graca, Parkkali, Saara, Abacassamo, Fatima, Augusto, Orvalho, Cliff, Julie, Regushevskaya, Elena, Dgedge, Martinho, Sousa, Cesar, Chilundo, Baltazar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4916582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27297013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011280
_version_ 1782438853207916544
author Hemminki, Elina
Nwaru, Bright I
Salomé, Graca
Parkkali, Saara
Abacassamo, Fatima
Augusto, Orvalho
Cliff, Julie
Regushevskaya, Elena
Dgedge, Martinho
Sousa, Cesar
Chilundo, Baltazar
author_facet Hemminki, Elina
Nwaru, Bright I
Salomé, Graca
Parkkali, Saara
Abacassamo, Fatima
Augusto, Orvalho
Cliff, Julie
Regushevskaya, Elena
Dgedge, Martinho
Sousa, Cesar
Chilundo, Baltazar
author_sort Hemminki, Elina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare routine versus selective (ie, screening and treatment for anaemia) prenatal iron prophylaxis in a malaria-endemic and HIV-prevalent setting, an extended analysis including previously missing data. DESIGN: A pragmatic randomised controlled clinical trial. SETTING: 2 health centres in Maputo, Mozambique. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women (≥18 years old; non-high-risk pregnancy) were randomly allocated to routine iron (n=2184) and selective iron (n=2142) groups. INTERVENTIONS: In the routine group, women received 60 mg ferrous sulfate plus 400 μg folic acid daily. In the selective group, women received 1 mg of folic acid daily and haemoglobin (Hb) screening at each visit; with low Hb (cut-off 9 g/dL) treatment (120 mg+800 μg of folic acid daily) for a month. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes: preterm birth, low birth weight; secondary outcomes: self-reported malaria, labour complications, caesarean section, perinatal death, woman's death. Nurses collected pregnancy data. Birth data were abstracted from hospital records for 52% of women and traced using various methods and linked with probabilistic matching for 24%. Women's deaths were collected from death registers. RESULTS: Birth data were available for 3301 (76%) of the women. Outcomes were similar in the two groups: preterm births (27.1% in the selective vs 25.3% in the routine group), low birthweight infants (11.0% vs 11.7%), perinatal deaths (2.4% vs 2.4%) and caesarean sections (4.0% vs 4.5%). Women's deaths during pregnancy or <42 days postpartum were more common in the selective group (0.8% among the two best matched women) than in the routine group (0.4%). Extra deaths could not be explained by the cause of death, Hb level or HIV status at recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: Birth outcomes were similar in the two iron groups. There might have been more women's deaths in the selective iron group, but it is unclear whether this was due to the intervention, other factors or chance finding. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00488579.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4916582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49165822016-06-24 Is selective prenatal iron prophylaxis better than routine prophylaxis: final results of a trial (PROFEG) in Maputo, Mozambique Hemminki, Elina Nwaru, Bright I Salomé, Graca Parkkali, Saara Abacassamo, Fatima Augusto, Orvalho Cliff, Julie Regushevskaya, Elena Dgedge, Martinho Sousa, Cesar Chilundo, Baltazar BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To compare routine versus selective (ie, screening and treatment for anaemia) prenatal iron prophylaxis in a malaria-endemic and HIV-prevalent setting, an extended analysis including previously missing data. DESIGN: A pragmatic randomised controlled clinical trial. SETTING: 2 health centres in Maputo, Mozambique. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women (≥18 years old; non-high-risk pregnancy) were randomly allocated to routine iron (n=2184) and selective iron (n=2142) groups. INTERVENTIONS: In the routine group, women received 60 mg ferrous sulfate plus 400 μg folic acid daily. In the selective group, women received 1 mg of folic acid daily and haemoglobin (Hb) screening at each visit; with low Hb (cut-off 9 g/dL) treatment (120 mg+800 μg of folic acid daily) for a month. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes: preterm birth, low birth weight; secondary outcomes: self-reported malaria, labour complications, caesarean section, perinatal death, woman's death. Nurses collected pregnancy data. Birth data were abstracted from hospital records for 52% of women and traced using various methods and linked with probabilistic matching for 24%. Women's deaths were collected from death registers. RESULTS: Birth data were available for 3301 (76%) of the women. Outcomes were similar in the two groups: preterm births (27.1% in the selective vs 25.3% in the routine group), low birthweight infants (11.0% vs 11.7%), perinatal deaths (2.4% vs 2.4%) and caesarean sections (4.0% vs 4.5%). Women's deaths during pregnancy or <42 days postpartum were more common in the selective group (0.8% among the two best matched women) than in the routine group (0.4%). Extra deaths could not be explained by the cause of death, Hb level or HIV status at recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: Birth outcomes were similar in the two iron groups. There might have been more women's deaths in the selective iron group, but it is unclear whether this was due to the intervention, other factors or chance finding. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00488579. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4916582/ /pubmed/27297013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011280 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Hemminki, Elina
Nwaru, Bright I
Salomé, Graca
Parkkali, Saara
Abacassamo, Fatima
Augusto, Orvalho
Cliff, Julie
Regushevskaya, Elena
Dgedge, Martinho
Sousa, Cesar
Chilundo, Baltazar
Is selective prenatal iron prophylaxis better than routine prophylaxis: final results of a trial (PROFEG) in Maputo, Mozambique
title Is selective prenatal iron prophylaxis better than routine prophylaxis: final results of a trial (PROFEG) in Maputo, Mozambique
title_full Is selective prenatal iron prophylaxis better than routine prophylaxis: final results of a trial (PROFEG) in Maputo, Mozambique
title_fullStr Is selective prenatal iron prophylaxis better than routine prophylaxis: final results of a trial (PROFEG) in Maputo, Mozambique
title_full_unstemmed Is selective prenatal iron prophylaxis better than routine prophylaxis: final results of a trial (PROFEG) in Maputo, Mozambique
title_short Is selective prenatal iron prophylaxis better than routine prophylaxis: final results of a trial (PROFEG) in Maputo, Mozambique
title_sort is selective prenatal iron prophylaxis better than routine prophylaxis: final results of a trial (profeg) in maputo, mozambique
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4916582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27297013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011280
work_keys_str_mv AT hemminkielina isselectiveprenatalironprophylaxisbetterthanroutineprophylaxisfinalresultsofatrialprofeginmaputomozambique
AT nwarubrighti isselectiveprenatalironprophylaxisbetterthanroutineprophylaxisfinalresultsofatrialprofeginmaputomozambique
AT salomegraca isselectiveprenatalironprophylaxisbetterthanroutineprophylaxisfinalresultsofatrialprofeginmaputomozambique
AT parkkalisaara isselectiveprenatalironprophylaxisbetterthanroutineprophylaxisfinalresultsofatrialprofeginmaputomozambique
AT abacassamofatima isselectiveprenatalironprophylaxisbetterthanroutineprophylaxisfinalresultsofatrialprofeginmaputomozambique
AT augustoorvalho isselectiveprenatalironprophylaxisbetterthanroutineprophylaxisfinalresultsofatrialprofeginmaputomozambique
AT cliffjulie isselectiveprenatalironprophylaxisbetterthanroutineprophylaxisfinalresultsofatrialprofeginmaputomozambique
AT regushevskayaelena isselectiveprenatalironprophylaxisbetterthanroutineprophylaxisfinalresultsofatrialprofeginmaputomozambique
AT dgedgemartinho isselectiveprenatalironprophylaxisbetterthanroutineprophylaxisfinalresultsofatrialprofeginmaputomozambique
AT sousacesar isselectiveprenatalironprophylaxisbetterthanroutineprophylaxisfinalresultsofatrialprofeginmaputomozambique
AT chilundobaltazar isselectiveprenatalironprophylaxisbetterthanroutineprophylaxisfinalresultsofatrialprofeginmaputomozambique