Cargando…
Medical consumption compared for TIMI and HEART score in chest pain patients at the emergency department: a retrospective cost analysis
OBJECTIVE: To investigate which risk score (TIMI score or HEART score) identifies the largest population of low-risk patients at the emergency department (ED). Furthermore, we retrospectively calculated the corresponding expected decrease in medical consumption if these patients would have been disc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4916625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27311905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010694 |
_version_ | 1782438862507737088 |
---|---|
author | Nieuwets, A Poldervaart, J M Reitsma, J B Buitendijk, S Six, A J Backus, B E Hoes, A W Doevendans, P A |
author_facet | Nieuwets, A Poldervaart, J M Reitsma, J B Buitendijk, S Six, A J Backus, B E Hoes, A W Doevendans, P A |
author_sort | Nieuwets, A |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate which risk score (TIMI score or HEART score) identifies the largest population of low-risk patients at the emergency department (ED). Furthermore, we retrospectively calculated the corresponding expected decrease in medical consumption if these patients would have been discharged from the ED. METHODS: We performed analyses in two hospitals of the multicentre prospective validation study of the HEART score, executed in 2008 and 2009. Patients with chest pain presenting to the ED were included and information was collected on major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and on hospital admissions and diagnostic procedures within 6 weeks. The TIMI and HEART score were calculated for each patient. RESULTS: We analysed 640 patients (59% male, mean age of 60, cumulative incidence of MACE 17%). An estimated total of €763 468 was spent during follow-up on hospital admission and diagnostic procedures. In total, 256 (40%) patients had a HEART score of 0–3 and were considered low risk (miss rate 1.6%), a total of €64 107 was spent on diagnostic procedures and hospital admission after initial presentation in this group. In comparison, 105 (16%) patients with TIMI score of 0 were considered low risk (miss rate 0%), with a total of €14 670 spent on diagnostic procedures and initial hospital admission costs. With different cut-offs for low risk, HEART 0–2 (miss rate 0.7%), would have resulted in a total of €25 365 in savings, compared with €71 905 when an alternative low risk cut-off for TIMI of TIMI≤1 would be used (miss rate 3.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The HEART score identifies more patients as low risk compared with the TIMI score, which may lead to a larger reduction in diagnostic procedures and costs in this low-risk group. Future studies should prospectively investigate whether adhering to the HEART score in clinical practice and early discharge of low-risk patients is safe and leads to a reduction in medical consumption. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4916625 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49166252016-06-24 Medical consumption compared for TIMI and HEART score in chest pain patients at the emergency department: a retrospective cost analysis Nieuwets, A Poldervaart, J M Reitsma, J B Buitendijk, S Six, A J Backus, B E Hoes, A W Doevendans, P A BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVE: To investigate which risk score (TIMI score or HEART score) identifies the largest population of low-risk patients at the emergency department (ED). Furthermore, we retrospectively calculated the corresponding expected decrease in medical consumption if these patients would have been discharged from the ED. METHODS: We performed analyses in two hospitals of the multicentre prospective validation study of the HEART score, executed in 2008 and 2009. Patients with chest pain presenting to the ED were included and information was collected on major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and on hospital admissions and diagnostic procedures within 6 weeks. The TIMI and HEART score were calculated for each patient. RESULTS: We analysed 640 patients (59% male, mean age of 60, cumulative incidence of MACE 17%). An estimated total of €763 468 was spent during follow-up on hospital admission and diagnostic procedures. In total, 256 (40%) patients had a HEART score of 0–3 and were considered low risk (miss rate 1.6%), a total of €64 107 was spent on diagnostic procedures and hospital admission after initial presentation in this group. In comparison, 105 (16%) patients with TIMI score of 0 were considered low risk (miss rate 0%), with a total of €14 670 spent on diagnostic procedures and initial hospital admission costs. With different cut-offs for low risk, HEART 0–2 (miss rate 0.7%), would have resulted in a total of €25 365 in savings, compared with €71 905 when an alternative low risk cut-off for TIMI of TIMI≤1 would be used (miss rate 3.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The HEART score identifies more patients as low risk compared with the TIMI score, which may lead to a larger reduction in diagnostic procedures and costs in this low-risk group. Future studies should prospectively investigate whether adhering to the HEART score in clinical practice and early discharge of low-risk patients is safe and leads to a reduction in medical consumption. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4916625/ /pubmed/27311905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010694 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Health Economics Nieuwets, A Poldervaart, J M Reitsma, J B Buitendijk, S Six, A J Backus, B E Hoes, A W Doevendans, P A Medical consumption compared for TIMI and HEART score in chest pain patients at the emergency department: a retrospective cost analysis |
title | Medical consumption compared for TIMI and HEART score in chest pain patients at the emergency department: a retrospective cost analysis |
title_full | Medical consumption compared for TIMI and HEART score in chest pain patients at the emergency department: a retrospective cost analysis |
title_fullStr | Medical consumption compared for TIMI and HEART score in chest pain patients at the emergency department: a retrospective cost analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Medical consumption compared for TIMI and HEART score in chest pain patients at the emergency department: a retrospective cost analysis |
title_short | Medical consumption compared for TIMI and HEART score in chest pain patients at the emergency department: a retrospective cost analysis |
title_sort | medical consumption compared for timi and heart score in chest pain patients at the emergency department: a retrospective cost analysis |
topic | Health Economics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4916625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27311905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010694 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nieuwetsa medicalconsumptioncomparedfortimiandheartscoreinchestpainpatientsattheemergencydepartmentaretrospectivecostanalysis AT poldervaartjm medicalconsumptioncomparedfortimiandheartscoreinchestpainpatientsattheemergencydepartmentaretrospectivecostanalysis AT reitsmajb medicalconsumptioncomparedfortimiandheartscoreinchestpainpatientsattheemergencydepartmentaretrospectivecostanalysis AT buitendijks medicalconsumptioncomparedfortimiandheartscoreinchestpainpatientsattheemergencydepartmentaretrospectivecostanalysis AT sixaj medicalconsumptioncomparedfortimiandheartscoreinchestpainpatientsattheemergencydepartmentaretrospectivecostanalysis AT backusbe medicalconsumptioncomparedfortimiandheartscoreinchestpainpatientsattheemergencydepartmentaretrospectivecostanalysis AT hoesaw medicalconsumptioncomparedfortimiandheartscoreinchestpainpatientsattheemergencydepartmentaretrospectivecostanalysis AT doevendanspa medicalconsumptioncomparedfortimiandheartscoreinchestpainpatientsattheemergencydepartmentaretrospectivecostanalysis |