Cargando…

Medical consumption compared for TIMI and HEART score in chest pain patients at the emergency department: a retrospective cost analysis

OBJECTIVE: To investigate which risk score (TIMI score or HEART score) identifies the largest population of low-risk patients at the emergency department (ED). Furthermore, we retrospectively calculated the corresponding expected decrease in medical consumption if these patients would have been disc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nieuwets, A, Poldervaart, J M, Reitsma, J B, Buitendijk, S, Six, A J, Backus, B E, Hoes, A W, Doevendans, P A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4916625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27311905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010694
_version_ 1782438862507737088
author Nieuwets, A
Poldervaart, J M
Reitsma, J B
Buitendijk, S
Six, A J
Backus, B E
Hoes, A W
Doevendans, P A
author_facet Nieuwets, A
Poldervaart, J M
Reitsma, J B
Buitendijk, S
Six, A J
Backus, B E
Hoes, A W
Doevendans, P A
author_sort Nieuwets, A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate which risk score (TIMI score or HEART score) identifies the largest population of low-risk patients at the emergency department (ED). Furthermore, we retrospectively calculated the corresponding expected decrease in medical consumption if these patients would have been discharged from the ED. METHODS: We performed analyses in two hospitals of the multicentre prospective validation study of the HEART score, executed in 2008 and 2009. Patients with chest pain presenting to the ED were included and information was collected on major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and on hospital admissions and diagnostic procedures within 6 weeks. The TIMI and HEART score were calculated for each patient. RESULTS: We analysed 640 patients (59% male, mean age of 60, cumulative incidence of MACE 17%). An estimated total of €763 468 was spent during follow-up on hospital admission and diagnostic procedures. In total, 256 (40%) patients had a HEART score of 0–3 and were considered low risk (miss rate 1.6%), a total of €64 107 was spent on diagnostic procedures and hospital admission after initial presentation in this group. In comparison, 105 (16%) patients with TIMI score of 0 were considered low risk (miss rate 0%), with a total of €14 670 spent on diagnostic procedures and initial hospital admission costs. With different cut-offs for low risk, HEART 0–2 (miss rate 0.7%), would have resulted in a total of €25 365 in savings, compared with €71 905 when an alternative low risk cut-off for TIMI of TIMI≤1 would be used (miss rate 3.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The HEART score identifies more patients as low risk compared with the TIMI score, which may lead to a larger reduction in diagnostic procedures and costs in this low-risk group. Future studies should prospectively investigate whether adhering to the HEART score in clinical practice and early discharge of low-risk patients is safe and leads to a reduction in medical consumption.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4916625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49166252016-06-24 Medical consumption compared for TIMI and HEART score in chest pain patients at the emergency department: a retrospective cost analysis Nieuwets, A Poldervaart, J M Reitsma, J B Buitendijk, S Six, A J Backus, B E Hoes, A W Doevendans, P A BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVE: To investigate which risk score (TIMI score or HEART score) identifies the largest population of low-risk patients at the emergency department (ED). Furthermore, we retrospectively calculated the corresponding expected decrease in medical consumption if these patients would have been discharged from the ED. METHODS: We performed analyses in two hospitals of the multicentre prospective validation study of the HEART score, executed in 2008 and 2009. Patients with chest pain presenting to the ED were included and information was collected on major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and on hospital admissions and diagnostic procedures within 6 weeks. The TIMI and HEART score were calculated for each patient. RESULTS: We analysed 640 patients (59% male, mean age of 60, cumulative incidence of MACE 17%). An estimated total of €763 468 was spent during follow-up on hospital admission and diagnostic procedures. In total, 256 (40%) patients had a HEART score of 0–3 and were considered low risk (miss rate 1.6%), a total of €64 107 was spent on diagnostic procedures and hospital admission after initial presentation in this group. In comparison, 105 (16%) patients with TIMI score of 0 were considered low risk (miss rate 0%), with a total of €14 670 spent on diagnostic procedures and initial hospital admission costs. With different cut-offs for low risk, HEART 0–2 (miss rate 0.7%), would have resulted in a total of €25 365 in savings, compared with €71 905 when an alternative low risk cut-off for TIMI of TIMI≤1 would be used (miss rate 3.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The HEART score identifies more patients as low risk compared with the TIMI score, which may lead to a larger reduction in diagnostic procedures and costs in this low-risk group. Future studies should prospectively investigate whether adhering to the HEART score in clinical practice and early discharge of low-risk patients is safe and leads to a reduction in medical consumption. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4916625/ /pubmed/27311905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010694 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Economics
Nieuwets, A
Poldervaart, J M
Reitsma, J B
Buitendijk, S
Six, A J
Backus, B E
Hoes, A W
Doevendans, P A
Medical consumption compared for TIMI and HEART score in chest pain patients at the emergency department: a retrospective cost analysis
title Medical consumption compared for TIMI and HEART score in chest pain patients at the emergency department: a retrospective cost analysis
title_full Medical consumption compared for TIMI and HEART score in chest pain patients at the emergency department: a retrospective cost analysis
title_fullStr Medical consumption compared for TIMI and HEART score in chest pain patients at the emergency department: a retrospective cost analysis
title_full_unstemmed Medical consumption compared for TIMI and HEART score in chest pain patients at the emergency department: a retrospective cost analysis
title_short Medical consumption compared for TIMI and HEART score in chest pain patients at the emergency department: a retrospective cost analysis
title_sort medical consumption compared for timi and heart score in chest pain patients at the emergency department: a retrospective cost analysis
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4916625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27311905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010694
work_keys_str_mv AT nieuwetsa medicalconsumptioncomparedfortimiandheartscoreinchestpainpatientsattheemergencydepartmentaretrospectivecostanalysis
AT poldervaartjm medicalconsumptioncomparedfortimiandheartscoreinchestpainpatientsattheemergencydepartmentaretrospectivecostanalysis
AT reitsmajb medicalconsumptioncomparedfortimiandheartscoreinchestpainpatientsattheemergencydepartmentaretrospectivecostanalysis
AT buitendijks medicalconsumptioncomparedfortimiandheartscoreinchestpainpatientsattheemergencydepartmentaretrospectivecostanalysis
AT sixaj medicalconsumptioncomparedfortimiandheartscoreinchestpainpatientsattheemergencydepartmentaretrospectivecostanalysis
AT backusbe medicalconsumptioncomparedfortimiandheartscoreinchestpainpatientsattheemergencydepartmentaretrospectivecostanalysis
AT hoesaw medicalconsumptioncomparedfortimiandheartscoreinchestpainpatientsattheemergencydepartmentaretrospectivecostanalysis
AT doevendanspa medicalconsumptioncomparedfortimiandheartscoreinchestpainpatientsattheemergencydepartmentaretrospectivecostanalysis