Cargando…

Novel, single-beat approach for determining both end-systolic pressure–dimension relationship and preload recruitable stroke work

OBJECTIVE: The end-systolic pressure–dimension relationship (ESPDR) and the preload recruitable stroke work (PRSW) relationship are load-insensitive measures of contractility, but their clinical application has been limited by the need to record multiple beats over a wide volume range. In this study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Inuzuka, Ryo, Kass, David A, Senzaki, Hideaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4916631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27347424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2016-000451
_version_ 1782438863870885888
author Inuzuka, Ryo
Kass, David A
Senzaki, Hideaki
author_facet Inuzuka, Ryo
Kass, David A
Senzaki, Hideaki
author_sort Inuzuka, Ryo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The end-systolic pressure–dimension relationship (ESPDR) and the preload recruitable stroke work (PRSW) relationship are load-insensitive measures of contractility, but their clinical application has been limited by the need to record multiple beats over a wide volume range. In this study, we therefore sought to validate a new method to concomitantly determine the ESPDR and the PRSW relationship from a single beat. METHODS: Pressure–dimension loops were recorded in 14 conscious dogs under various haemodynamic and pathological conditions. Multiple-beat PRSW relationship was determined for its slope (M(w)) and for a dimension-axis intercept (D(w)). The ESPDR represented by the formula [Image: see text], was estimated from a steady-state, single-beat late-systolic pressure–dimension relationship. The single-beat M(w) was determined as an end-systolic pressure when the end-systolic dimension was equal to D(w). RESULTS: A strong correlation was observed between multiple-beat and single-beat ESPDRs (zero-stress dimension; r=0.98, p<0.0001). The single-beat estimation of M(w) calculated using the wall thickness was strongly correlated with the actual M(w) (r=0.93, p<0.0001) and was sensitive enough to detect the change in contractility by dobutamine infusion (p<0.001) and by tachycardia-induced heart failure (p<0.001). Similar results were obtained for M(w) estimated without information on wall thickness. CONCLUSIONS: M(w) can be interpreted as an end-systolic pressure when the end-systolic dimension is equal to D(w). By using the non-linear ESPDR, accurate single-beat estimation of the ESPDR and M(w) is possible even without information on wall thickness. These results should enhance the applicability of pressure–volume framework to clinical medicine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4916631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49166312016-06-24 Novel, single-beat approach for determining both end-systolic pressure–dimension relationship and preload recruitable stroke work Inuzuka, Ryo Kass, David A Senzaki, Hideaki Open Heart Basic and Translational Research OBJECTIVE: The end-systolic pressure–dimension relationship (ESPDR) and the preload recruitable stroke work (PRSW) relationship are load-insensitive measures of contractility, but their clinical application has been limited by the need to record multiple beats over a wide volume range. In this study, we therefore sought to validate a new method to concomitantly determine the ESPDR and the PRSW relationship from a single beat. METHODS: Pressure–dimension loops were recorded in 14 conscious dogs under various haemodynamic and pathological conditions. Multiple-beat PRSW relationship was determined for its slope (M(w)) and for a dimension-axis intercept (D(w)). The ESPDR represented by the formula [Image: see text], was estimated from a steady-state, single-beat late-systolic pressure–dimension relationship. The single-beat M(w) was determined as an end-systolic pressure when the end-systolic dimension was equal to D(w). RESULTS: A strong correlation was observed between multiple-beat and single-beat ESPDRs (zero-stress dimension; r=0.98, p<0.0001). The single-beat estimation of M(w) calculated using the wall thickness was strongly correlated with the actual M(w) (r=0.93, p<0.0001) and was sensitive enough to detect the change in contractility by dobutamine infusion (p<0.001) and by tachycardia-induced heart failure (p<0.001). Similar results were obtained for M(w) estimated without information on wall thickness. CONCLUSIONS: M(w) can be interpreted as an end-systolic pressure when the end-systolic dimension is equal to D(w). By using the non-linear ESPDR, accurate single-beat estimation of the ESPDR and M(w) is possible even without information on wall thickness. These results should enhance the applicability of pressure–volume framework to clinical medicine. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4916631/ /pubmed/27347424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2016-000451 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Basic and Translational Research
Inuzuka, Ryo
Kass, David A
Senzaki, Hideaki
Novel, single-beat approach for determining both end-systolic pressure–dimension relationship and preload recruitable stroke work
title Novel, single-beat approach for determining both end-systolic pressure–dimension relationship and preload recruitable stroke work
title_full Novel, single-beat approach for determining both end-systolic pressure–dimension relationship and preload recruitable stroke work
title_fullStr Novel, single-beat approach for determining both end-systolic pressure–dimension relationship and preload recruitable stroke work
title_full_unstemmed Novel, single-beat approach for determining both end-systolic pressure–dimension relationship and preload recruitable stroke work
title_short Novel, single-beat approach for determining both end-systolic pressure–dimension relationship and preload recruitable stroke work
title_sort novel, single-beat approach for determining both end-systolic pressure–dimension relationship and preload recruitable stroke work
topic Basic and Translational Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4916631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27347424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2016-000451
work_keys_str_mv AT inuzukaryo novelsinglebeatapproachfordeterminingbothendsystolicpressuredimensionrelationshipandpreloadrecruitablestrokework
AT kassdavida novelsinglebeatapproachfordeterminingbothendsystolicpressuredimensionrelationshipandpreloadrecruitablestrokework
AT senzakihideaki novelsinglebeatapproachfordeterminingbothendsystolicpressuredimensionrelationshipandpreloadrecruitablestrokework