Cargando…
The use of the reverse shock index to identify high-risk trauma patients in addition to the criteria for trauma team activation: a cross-sectional study based on a trauma registry system
OBJECTIVES: The presentation of decrease blood pressure with tachycardia is usually an indicator of significant blood loss. In this study, we used the reverse shock index (RSI), a ratio of systolic blood pressure (SBP) to heart rate (HR), to evaluate the haemodynamic status of trauma patients. As an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4916635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27329440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011072 |
_version_ | 1782438864793632768 |
---|---|
author | Kuo, Spencer C H Kuo, Pao-Jen Hsu, Shiun-Yuan Rau, Cheng-Shyuan Chen, Yi-Chun Hsieh, Hsiao-Yun Hsieh, Ching-Hua |
author_facet | Kuo, Spencer C H Kuo, Pao-Jen Hsu, Shiun-Yuan Rau, Cheng-Shyuan Chen, Yi-Chun Hsieh, Hsiao-Yun Hsieh, Ching-Hua |
author_sort | Kuo, Spencer C H |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The presentation of decrease blood pressure with tachycardia is usually an indicator of significant blood loss. In this study, we used the reverse shock index (RSI), a ratio of systolic blood pressure (SBP) to heart rate (HR), to evaluate the haemodynamic status of trauma patients. As an SBP lower than the HR (RSI<1) may indicate haemodynamic instability, the objective of this study was to assess whether RSI<1 can help to identify high-risk patients with potential shock and poor outcome, even though these patients do not yet meet the criteria for multidisciplinary trauma team activation (TTA). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 20 106 patients obtained from the trauma registry system of a level I trauma centre for trauma admissions from January 2009 through December 2014. Patients for whom a trauma team was not activated (regular patients) and who had RSI<1 were compared with regular patients with RSI≥1. The ORs of the associated conditions and injuries were calculated with 95% CIs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Among regular patients with RSI<1, significantly more patients had an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥25 (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.58 to 3.62; p<0.001) and the mortality rate was also higher (2.1% vs 0.5%; OR 3.9, 95% CI 2.10 to 7.08; p<0.001) than in regular patients with RSI≥1. The intensive care unit length of stay was longer in regular patients with RSI<1 than in regular patients with RSI≥1. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who did not reach the criteria for TTA, RSI<1 indicates a potentially worse outcome and a requirement for more attention and aggressive care in the emergency department. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4916635 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49166352016-06-24 The use of the reverse shock index to identify high-risk trauma patients in addition to the criteria for trauma team activation: a cross-sectional study based on a trauma registry system Kuo, Spencer C H Kuo, Pao-Jen Hsu, Shiun-Yuan Rau, Cheng-Shyuan Chen, Yi-Chun Hsieh, Hsiao-Yun Hsieh, Ching-Hua BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: The presentation of decrease blood pressure with tachycardia is usually an indicator of significant blood loss. In this study, we used the reverse shock index (RSI), a ratio of systolic blood pressure (SBP) to heart rate (HR), to evaluate the haemodynamic status of trauma patients. As an SBP lower than the HR (RSI<1) may indicate haemodynamic instability, the objective of this study was to assess whether RSI<1 can help to identify high-risk patients with potential shock and poor outcome, even though these patients do not yet meet the criteria for multidisciplinary trauma team activation (TTA). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 20 106 patients obtained from the trauma registry system of a level I trauma centre for trauma admissions from January 2009 through December 2014. Patients for whom a trauma team was not activated (regular patients) and who had RSI<1 were compared with regular patients with RSI≥1. The ORs of the associated conditions and injuries were calculated with 95% CIs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Among regular patients with RSI<1, significantly more patients had an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥25 (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.58 to 3.62; p<0.001) and the mortality rate was also higher (2.1% vs 0.5%; OR 3.9, 95% CI 2.10 to 7.08; p<0.001) than in regular patients with RSI≥1. The intensive care unit length of stay was longer in regular patients with RSI<1 than in regular patients with RSI≥1. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who did not reach the criteria for TTA, RSI<1 indicates a potentially worse outcome and a requirement for more attention and aggressive care in the emergency department. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4916635/ /pubmed/27329440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011072 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Public Health Kuo, Spencer C H Kuo, Pao-Jen Hsu, Shiun-Yuan Rau, Cheng-Shyuan Chen, Yi-Chun Hsieh, Hsiao-Yun Hsieh, Ching-Hua The use of the reverse shock index to identify high-risk trauma patients in addition to the criteria for trauma team activation: a cross-sectional study based on a trauma registry system |
title | The use of the reverse shock index to identify high-risk trauma patients in addition to the criteria for trauma team activation: a cross-sectional study based on a trauma registry system |
title_full | The use of the reverse shock index to identify high-risk trauma patients in addition to the criteria for trauma team activation: a cross-sectional study based on a trauma registry system |
title_fullStr | The use of the reverse shock index to identify high-risk trauma patients in addition to the criteria for trauma team activation: a cross-sectional study based on a trauma registry system |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of the reverse shock index to identify high-risk trauma patients in addition to the criteria for trauma team activation: a cross-sectional study based on a trauma registry system |
title_short | The use of the reverse shock index to identify high-risk trauma patients in addition to the criteria for trauma team activation: a cross-sectional study based on a trauma registry system |
title_sort | use of the reverse shock index to identify high-risk trauma patients in addition to the criteria for trauma team activation: a cross-sectional study based on a trauma registry system |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4916635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27329440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011072 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kuospencerch theuseofthereverseshockindextoidentifyhighrisktraumapatientsinadditiontothecriteriafortraumateamactivationacrosssectionalstudybasedonatraumaregistrysystem AT kuopaojen theuseofthereverseshockindextoidentifyhighrisktraumapatientsinadditiontothecriteriafortraumateamactivationacrosssectionalstudybasedonatraumaregistrysystem AT hsushiunyuan theuseofthereverseshockindextoidentifyhighrisktraumapatientsinadditiontothecriteriafortraumateamactivationacrosssectionalstudybasedonatraumaregistrysystem AT rauchengshyuan theuseofthereverseshockindextoidentifyhighrisktraumapatientsinadditiontothecriteriafortraumateamactivationacrosssectionalstudybasedonatraumaregistrysystem AT chenyichun theuseofthereverseshockindextoidentifyhighrisktraumapatientsinadditiontothecriteriafortraumateamactivationacrosssectionalstudybasedonatraumaregistrysystem AT hsiehhsiaoyun theuseofthereverseshockindextoidentifyhighrisktraumapatientsinadditiontothecriteriafortraumateamactivationacrosssectionalstudybasedonatraumaregistrysystem AT hsiehchinghua theuseofthereverseshockindextoidentifyhighrisktraumapatientsinadditiontothecriteriafortraumateamactivationacrosssectionalstudybasedonatraumaregistrysystem AT kuospencerch useofthereverseshockindextoidentifyhighrisktraumapatientsinadditiontothecriteriafortraumateamactivationacrosssectionalstudybasedonatraumaregistrysystem AT kuopaojen useofthereverseshockindextoidentifyhighrisktraumapatientsinadditiontothecriteriafortraumateamactivationacrosssectionalstudybasedonatraumaregistrysystem AT hsushiunyuan useofthereverseshockindextoidentifyhighrisktraumapatientsinadditiontothecriteriafortraumateamactivationacrosssectionalstudybasedonatraumaregistrysystem AT rauchengshyuan useofthereverseshockindextoidentifyhighrisktraumapatientsinadditiontothecriteriafortraumateamactivationacrosssectionalstudybasedonatraumaregistrysystem AT chenyichun useofthereverseshockindextoidentifyhighrisktraumapatientsinadditiontothecriteriafortraumateamactivationacrosssectionalstudybasedonatraumaregistrysystem AT hsiehhsiaoyun useofthereverseshockindextoidentifyhighrisktraumapatientsinadditiontothecriteriafortraumateamactivationacrosssectionalstudybasedonatraumaregistrysystem AT hsiehchinghua useofthereverseshockindextoidentifyhighrisktraumapatientsinadditiontothecriteriafortraumateamactivationacrosssectionalstudybasedonatraumaregistrysystem |