Cargando…
Use of a multi-instrument access device in abdominoperineal resections
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery results in less post-operative pain, faster recovery, shorter length of stay and reduced morbidity compared with open procedures. Less or minimally invasive techniques have been developed to further minimise surgical trauma and to decrease the size and num...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4916752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27279397 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.181386 |
_version_ | 1782438870903685120 |
---|---|
author | van der Linden, Yoen TK Boersma, Doeke Bosscha, Koop Lips, Daniel J Prins, Hubert A |
author_facet | van der Linden, Yoen TK Boersma, Doeke Bosscha, Koop Lips, Daniel J Prins, Hubert A |
author_sort | van der Linden, Yoen TK |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery results in less post-operative pain, faster recovery, shorter length of stay and reduced morbidity compared with open procedures. Less or minimally invasive techniques have been developed to further minimise surgical trauma and to decrease the size and number of incisions. This study describes the safety and feasibility of using an umbilical multi-instrument access (MIA) port (Olympus TriPort+) device with the placement of just one 12-mm suprapubic trocar in laparoscopic (double-port) abdominoperineal resections (APRs) in rectal cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 20 patients undergoing double-port APRs for rectal cancer between June 2011 and August 2013. Preoperative data were gathered in a prospective database, and post-operative data were collected retrospectively. RESULTS: The 20 patients (30% female) had a median age of 67 years (range 46-80 years), and their median body mass index (BMI) was 26 kg/m(2) (range 20-31 kg/m(2)). An additional third trocar was placed in 2 patients. No laparoscopic procedures were converted to an open procedure. Median operating time was 195 min (range 115-306 min). A radical resection (R0 resection) was achieved in all patients, with a median of 14 lymph nodes harvested. Median length of stay was 8 days (range 5-43 days). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic APR using a MIA trocar is a feasible and safe procedure. A MIA port might be of benefit as an extra option in the toolbox of the laparoscopic surgeon to further minimise surgical trauma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4916752 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49167522016-07-05 Use of a multi-instrument access device in abdominoperineal resections van der Linden, Yoen TK Boersma, Doeke Bosscha, Koop Lips, Daniel J Prins, Hubert A J Minim Access Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery results in less post-operative pain, faster recovery, shorter length of stay and reduced morbidity compared with open procedures. Less or minimally invasive techniques have been developed to further minimise surgical trauma and to decrease the size and number of incisions. This study describes the safety and feasibility of using an umbilical multi-instrument access (MIA) port (Olympus TriPort+) device with the placement of just one 12-mm suprapubic trocar in laparoscopic (double-port) abdominoperineal resections (APRs) in rectal cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 20 patients undergoing double-port APRs for rectal cancer between June 2011 and August 2013. Preoperative data were gathered in a prospective database, and post-operative data were collected retrospectively. RESULTS: The 20 patients (30% female) had a median age of 67 years (range 46-80 years), and their median body mass index (BMI) was 26 kg/m(2) (range 20-31 kg/m(2)). An additional third trocar was placed in 2 patients. No laparoscopic procedures were converted to an open procedure. Median operating time was 195 min (range 115-306 min). A radical resection (R0 resection) was achieved in all patients, with a median of 14 lymph nodes harvested. Median length of stay was 8 days (range 5-43 days). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic APR using a MIA trocar is a feasible and safe procedure. A MIA port might be of benefit as an extra option in the toolbox of the laparoscopic surgeon to further minimise surgical trauma. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4916752/ /pubmed/27279397 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.181386 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Journal of Minimal Access Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article van der Linden, Yoen TK Boersma, Doeke Bosscha, Koop Lips, Daniel J Prins, Hubert A Use of a multi-instrument access device in abdominoperineal resections |
title | Use of a multi-instrument access device in abdominoperineal resections |
title_full | Use of a multi-instrument access device in abdominoperineal resections |
title_fullStr | Use of a multi-instrument access device in abdominoperineal resections |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of a multi-instrument access device in abdominoperineal resections |
title_short | Use of a multi-instrument access device in abdominoperineal resections |
title_sort | use of a multi-instrument access device in abdominoperineal resections |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4916752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27279397 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.181386 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanderlindenyoentk useofamultiinstrumentaccessdeviceinabdominoperinealresections AT boersmadoeke useofamultiinstrumentaccessdeviceinabdominoperinealresections AT bosschakoop useofamultiinstrumentaccessdeviceinabdominoperinealresections AT lipsdanielj useofamultiinstrumentaccessdeviceinabdominoperinealresections AT prinshuberta useofamultiinstrumentaccessdeviceinabdominoperinealresections |