Cargando…
To evaluate the influence of smear layer with different instruments and obturation methods on microleakage of root canal filled teeth: In vitro study
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The success of root canal treatment depends on proper debridement, instrumentation, proper accessibility, and proper restoration. The presence of a smear layer is considered to be a significant factor. This in vitro study was conducted to assess the effect of the presence/absenc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4916799/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27382541 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.183110 |
_version_ | 1782438879655100416 |
---|---|
author | Likhitkar, Manoj S. Kulkarni, Shantaram V. Burande, Aravind Solanke, Vishal Kumar, C. Sushil Kamble, Babasaheb |
author_facet | Likhitkar, Manoj S. Kulkarni, Shantaram V. Burande, Aravind Solanke, Vishal Kumar, C. Sushil Kamble, Babasaheb |
author_sort | Likhitkar, Manoj S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The success of root canal treatment depends on proper debridement, instrumentation, proper accessibility, and proper restoration. The presence of a smear layer is considered to be a significant factor. This in vitro study was conducted to assess the effect of the presence/absence of a smear layer on the microleakage of root canal filled teeth using different instruments and obturation methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred extracted mandibular premolars with closed apices and single roots were chosen and then divided into six groups, A to F, consisting of 15 teeth each. The control group included 10 teeth; 5 positive and 5 negative. The teeth were decoronated at the cementoenamel junction. Groups A, B, C, and D were instrumented with engine-driven rotary Protaper NiTi files. Groups E and F were instrumented with conventional stainless steel hand files. Groups A, C, and E were flushed with 3 ml of 17% EDTA to remove the smear layer prior to obturation. All teeth were flushed with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite solution and obturated with AH-Plus sealer with lateral condensation technique for Groups C, D, E, F and with thermoplasticized gutta-percha technique for Groups A and B. Using an electrochemical technique, leakages in the obturated canals were assessed for 45 days. The results were tabulated using Student's t-test (paired and unpaired t-test) with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Software Version 21 (IBM Company, New York, USA). RESULTS: Group A showed the lowest mean value at intervals of 10, 20, 30, and 45 days. There was no current flow in the negative controls during the test period. There was leakage in the positive controls within a few minutes of immersion. CONCLUSION: The results showed that rotary instrumentation contributed toward an exceptional preparation of root canals compared to hand instrumentation. Elimination of the smear layer enhanced the resistance to microleakage; thermoplasticized gutta-percha obturation technique produced a better seal compared to the lateral condensation technique. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4916799 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49167992016-07-05 To evaluate the influence of smear layer with different instruments and obturation methods on microleakage of root canal filled teeth: In vitro study Likhitkar, Manoj S. Kulkarni, Shantaram V. Burande, Aravind Solanke, Vishal Kumar, C. Sushil Kamble, Babasaheb J Int Soc Prev Community Dent Original Article AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The success of root canal treatment depends on proper debridement, instrumentation, proper accessibility, and proper restoration. The presence of a smear layer is considered to be a significant factor. This in vitro study was conducted to assess the effect of the presence/absence of a smear layer on the microleakage of root canal filled teeth using different instruments and obturation methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred extracted mandibular premolars with closed apices and single roots were chosen and then divided into six groups, A to F, consisting of 15 teeth each. The control group included 10 teeth; 5 positive and 5 negative. The teeth were decoronated at the cementoenamel junction. Groups A, B, C, and D were instrumented with engine-driven rotary Protaper NiTi files. Groups E and F were instrumented with conventional stainless steel hand files. Groups A, C, and E were flushed with 3 ml of 17% EDTA to remove the smear layer prior to obturation. All teeth were flushed with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite solution and obturated with AH-Plus sealer with lateral condensation technique for Groups C, D, E, F and with thermoplasticized gutta-percha technique for Groups A and B. Using an electrochemical technique, leakages in the obturated canals were assessed for 45 days. The results were tabulated using Student's t-test (paired and unpaired t-test) with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Software Version 21 (IBM Company, New York, USA). RESULTS: Group A showed the lowest mean value at intervals of 10, 20, 30, and 45 days. There was no current flow in the negative controls during the test period. There was leakage in the positive controls within a few minutes of immersion. CONCLUSION: The results showed that rotary instrumentation contributed toward an exceptional preparation of root canals compared to hand instrumentation. Elimination of the smear layer enhanced the resistance to microleakage; thermoplasticized gutta-percha obturation technique produced a better seal compared to the lateral condensation technique. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 2016-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4916799/ /pubmed/27382541 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.183110 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Likhitkar, Manoj S. Kulkarni, Shantaram V. Burande, Aravind Solanke, Vishal Kumar, C. Sushil Kamble, Babasaheb To evaluate the influence of smear layer with different instruments and obturation methods on microleakage of root canal filled teeth: In vitro study |
title | To evaluate the influence of smear layer with different instruments and obturation methods on microleakage of root canal filled teeth: In vitro study |
title_full | To evaluate the influence of smear layer with different instruments and obturation methods on microleakage of root canal filled teeth: In vitro study |
title_fullStr | To evaluate the influence of smear layer with different instruments and obturation methods on microleakage of root canal filled teeth: In vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | To evaluate the influence of smear layer with different instruments and obturation methods on microleakage of root canal filled teeth: In vitro study |
title_short | To evaluate the influence of smear layer with different instruments and obturation methods on microleakage of root canal filled teeth: In vitro study |
title_sort | to evaluate the influence of smear layer with different instruments and obturation methods on microleakage of root canal filled teeth: in vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4916799/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27382541 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.183110 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT likhitkarmanojs toevaluatetheinfluenceofsmearlayerwithdifferentinstrumentsandobturationmethodsonmicroleakageofrootcanalfilledteethinvitrostudy AT kulkarnishantaramv toevaluatetheinfluenceofsmearlayerwithdifferentinstrumentsandobturationmethodsonmicroleakageofrootcanalfilledteethinvitrostudy AT burandearavind toevaluatetheinfluenceofsmearlayerwithdifferentinstrumentsandobturationmethodsonmicroleakageofrootcanalfilledteethinvitrostudy AT solankevishal toevaluatetheinfluenceofsmearlayerwithdifferentinstrumentsandobturationmethodsonmicroleakageofrootcanalfilledteethinvitrostudy AT kumarcsushil toevaluatetheinfluenceofsmearlayerwithdifferentinstrumentsandobturationmethodsonmicroleakageofrootcanalfilledteethinvitrostudy AT kamblebabasaheb toevaluatetheinfluenceofsmearlayerwithdifferentinstrumentsandobturationmethodsonmicroleakageofrootcanalfilledteethinvitrostudy |