Cargando…

Retention of denture bases fabricated by three different processing techniques – An in vivo study

AIM: Distortion due to Polymerization shrinkage compromises the retention. To evaluate the amount of retention of denture bases fabricated by conventional, anchorized, and injection molding polymerization techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten completely edentulous patients were selected, impression...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chalapathi Kumar, V. H., Surapaneni, Hemchand, Ravikiran, V., Chandra, B. Sarat, Balusu, Srilatha, Reddy, V. Naveen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4916800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27382542
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.183106
_version_ 1782438879886835712
author Chalapathi Kumar, V. H.
Surapaneni, Hemchand
Ravikiran, V.
Chandra, B. Sarat
Balusu, Srilatha
Reddy, V. Naveen
author_facet Chalapathi Kumar, V. H.
Surapaneni, Hemchand
Ravikiran, V.
Chandra, B. Sarat
Balusu, Srilatha
Reddy, V. Naveen
author_sort Chalapathi Kumar, V. H.
collection PubMed
description AIM: Distortion due to Polymerization shrinkage compromises the retention. To evaluate the amount of retention of denture bases fabricated by conventional, anchorized, and injection molding polymerization techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten completely edentulous patients were selected, impressions were made, and master cast obtained was duplicated to fabricate denture bases by three polymerization techniques. Loop was attached to the finished denture bases to estimate the force required to dislodge them by retention apparatus. Readings were subjected to nonparametric Friedman two-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni correction methods and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test. RESULTS: Denture bases fabricated by injection molding (3740 g), anchorized techniques (2913 g) recorded greater retention values than conventional technique (2468 g). Significant difference was seen between these techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Denture bases obtained by injection molding polymerization technique exhibited maximum retention, followed by anchorized technique, and least retention was seen in conventional molding technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4916800
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49168002016-07-05 Retention of denture bases fabricated by three different processing techniques – An in vivo study Chalapathi Kumar, V. H. Surapaneni, Hemchand Ravikiran, V. Chandra, B. Sarat Balusu, Srilatha Reddy, V. Naveen J Int Soc Prev Community Dent Original Article AIM: Distortion due to Polymerization shrinkage compromises the retention. To evaluate the amount of retention of denture bases fabricated by conventional, anchorized, and injection molding polymerization techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten completely edentulous patients were selected, impressions were made, and master cast obtained was duplicated to fabricate denture bases by three polymerization techniques. Loop was attached to the finished denture bases to estimate the force required to dislodge them by retention apparatus. Readings were subjected to nonparametric Friedman two-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni correction methods and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test. RESULTS: Denture bases fabricated by injection molding (3740 g), anchorized techniques (2913 g) recorded greater retention values than conventional technique (2468 g). Significant difference was seen between these techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Denture bases obtained by injection molding polymerization technique exhibited maximum retention, followed by anchorized technique, and least retention was seen in conventional molding technique. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 2016-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4916800/ /pubmed/27382542 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.183106 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chalapathi Kumar, V. H.
Surapaneni, Hemchand
Ravikiran, V.
Chandra, B. Sarat
Balusu, Srilatha
Reddy, V. Naveen
Retention of denture bases fabricated by three different processing techniques – An in vivo study
title Retention of denture bases fabricated by three different processing techniques – An in vivo study
title_full Retention of denture bases fabricated by three different processing techniques – An in vivo study
title_fullStr Retention of denture bases fabricated by three different processing techniques – An in vivo study
title_full_unstemmed Retention of denture bases fabricated by three different processing techniques – An in vivo study
title_short Retention of denture bases fabricated by three different processing techniques – An in vivo study
title_sort retention of denture bases fabricated by three different processing techniques – an in vivo study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4916800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27382542
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.183106
work_keys_str_mv AT chalapathikumarvh retentionofdenturebasesfabricatedbythreedifferentprocessingtechniquesaninvivostudy
AT surapanenihemchand retentionofdenturebasesfabricatedbythreedifferentprocessingtechniquesaninvivostudy
AT ravikiranv retentionofdenturebasesfabricatedbythreedifferentprocessingtechniquesaninvivostudy
AT chandrabsarat retentionofdenturebasesfabricatedbythreedifferentprocessingtechniquesaninvivostudy
AT balususrilatha retentionofdenturebasesfabricatedbythreedifferentprocessingtechniquesaninvivostudy
AT reddyvnaveen retentionofdenturebasesfabricatedbythreedifferentprocessingtechniquesaninvivostudy