Cargando…

Building a Patient-Specific Risk Score with a Large Database of Discharge Summary Reports

BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in clinical research with electronic medical data, but it often faces the challenges of heterogeneity between hospitals. Our objective was to develop a single numerical score for characterizing such heterogeneity via computing inpatient mortality in treating...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qu, Zhi, Zhao, Lue Ping, Ma, Xiemin, Zhan, Siyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4917324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27318825
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.899262
_version_ 1782438935213899776
author Qu, Zhi
Zhao, Lue Ping
Ma, Xiemin
Zhan, Siyan
author_facet Qu, Zhi
Zhao, Lue Ping
Ma, Xiemin
Zhan, Siyan
author_sort Qu, Zhi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in clinical research with electronic medical data, but it often faces the challenges of heterogeneity between hospitals. Our objective was to develop a single numerical score for characterizing such heterogeneity via computing inpatient mortality in treating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients based on diagnostic information recorded in the database of Discharge Summary Reports (DSR). MATERIAL/METHODS: Using 4 216 135 DSRs of 49 tertiary hospitals from 2006 to 2010 in Beijing, more than 200 secondary diagnoses were identified to develop a risk score for AMI (n=50 531). This risk score was independently validated with 21 571 DSRs from 65 tertiary hospitals in 2012. The c-statistics of new risk score was computed as a measure of discrimination and was compared with the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and its adaptions for further validation. RESULTS: We finally identified and weighted 22 secondary diagnoses using a logistic regression model. In the external validation, the novel risk score performed better than the widely used CCI in predicting in-hospital mortality of AMI patients (c-statistics: 0.829, 0.832, 0.824 vs. 0.775, 0.773, and 0.710 in training, testing, and validating dataset, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The new risk score developed from DSRs outperform the existing administrative data when applied to healthcare data from China. This risk score can be used for adjusting heterogeneity between hospitals when clinical data from multiple hospitals are included.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4917324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49173242016-06-30 Building a Patient-Specific Risk Score with a Large Database of Discharge Summary Reports Qu, Zhi Zhao, Lue Ping Ma, Xiemin Zhan, Siyan Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in clinical research with electronic medical data, but it often faces the challenges of heterogeneity between hospitals. Our objective was to develop a single numerical score for characterizing such heterogeneity via computing inpatient mortality in treating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients based on diagnostic information recorded in the database of Discharge Summary Reports (DSR). MATERIAL/METHODS: Using 4 216 135 DSRs of 49 tertiary hospitals from 2006 to 2010 in Beijing, more than 200 secondary diagnoses were identified to develop a risk score for AMI (n=50 531). This risk score was independently validated with 21 571 DSRs from 65 tertiary hospitals in 2012. The c-statistics of new risk score was computed as a measure of discrimination and was compared with the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and its adaptions for further validation. RESULTS: We finally identified and weighted 22 secondary diagnoses using a logistic regression model. In the external validation, the novel risk score performed better than the widely used CCI in predicting in-hospital mortality of AMI patients (c-statistics: 0.829, 0.832, 0.824 vs. 0.775, 0.773, and 0.710 in training, testing, and validating dataset, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The new risk score developed from DSRs outperform the existing administrative data when applied to healthcare data from China. This risk score can be used for adjusting heterogeneity between hospitals when clinical data from multiple hospitals are included. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2016-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4917324/ /pubmed/27318825 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.899262 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2016 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Qu, Zhi
Zhao, Lue Ping
Ma, Xiemin
Zhan, Siyan
Building a Patient-Specific Risk Score with a Large Database of Discharge Summary Reports
title Building a Patient-Specific Risk Score with a Large Database of Discharge Summary Reports
title_full Building a Patient-Specific Risk Score with a Large Database of Discharge Summary Reports
title_fullStr Building a Patient-Specific Risk Score with a Large Database of Discharge Summary Reports
title_full_unstemmed Building a Patient-Specific Risk Score with a Large Database of Discharge Summary Reports
title_short Building a Patient-Specific Risk Score with a Large Database of Discharge Summary Reports
title_sort building a patient-specific risk score with a large database of discharge summary reports
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4917324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27318825
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.899262
work_keys_str_mv AT quzhi buildingapatientspecificriskscorewithalargedatabaseofdischargesummaryreports
AT zhaolueping buildingapatientspecificriskscorewithalargedatabaseofdischargesummaryreports
AT maxiemin buildingapatientspecificriskscorewithalargedatabaseofdischargesummaryreports
AT zhansiyan buildingapatientspecificriskscorewithalargedatabaseofdischargesummaryreports