Cargando…
Building a Patient-Specific Risk Score with a Large Database of Discharge Summary Reports
BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in clinical research with electronic medical data, but it often faces the challenges of heterogeneity between hospitals. Our objective was to develop a single numerical score for characterizing such heterogeneity via computing inpatient mortality in treating...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scientific Literature, Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4917324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27318825 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.899262 |
_version_ | 1782438935213899776 |
---|---|
author | Qu, Zhi Zhao, Lue Ping Ma, Xiemin Zhan, Siyan |
author_facet | Qu, Zhi Zhao, Lue Ping Ma, Xiemin Zhan, Siyan |
author_sort | Qu, Zhi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in clinical research with electronic medical data, but it often faces the challenges of heterogeneity between hospitals. Our objective was to develop a single numerical score for characterizing such heterogeneity via computing inpatient mortality in treating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients based on diagnostic information recorded in the database of Discharge Summary Reports (DSR). MATERIAL/METHODS: Using 4 216 135 DSRs of 49 tertiary hospitals from 2006 to 2010 in Beijing, more than 200 secondary diagnoses were identified to develop a risk score for AMI (n=50 531). This risk score was independently validated with 21 571 DSRs from 65 tertiary hospitals in 2012. The c-statistics of new risk score was computed as a measure of discrimination and was compared with the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and its adaptions for further validation. RESULTS: We finally identified and weighted 22 secondary diagnoses using a logistic regression model. In the external validation, the novel risk score performed better than the widely used CCI in predicting in-hospital mortality of AMI patients (c-statistics: 0.829, 0.832, 0.824 vs. 0.775, 0.773, and 0.710 in training, testing, and validating dataset, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The new risk score developed from DSRs outperform the existing administrative data when applied to healthcare data from China. This risk score can be used for adjusting heterogeneity between hospitals when clinical data from multiple hospitals are included. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4917324 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | International Scientific Literature, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49173242016-06-30 Building a Patient-Specific Risk Score with a Large Database of Discharge Summary Reports Qu, Zhi Zhao, Lue Ping Ma, Xiemin Zhan, Siyan Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in clinical research with electronic medical data, but it often faces the challenges of heterogeneity between hospitals. Our objective was to develop a single numerical score for characterizing such heterogeneity via computing inpatient mortality in treating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients based on diagnostic information recorded in the database of Discharge Summary Reports (DSR). MATERIAL/METHODS: Using 4 216 135 DSRs of 49 tertiary hospitals from 2006 to 2010 in Beijing, more than 200 secondary diagnoses were identified to develop a risk score for AMI (n=50 531). This risk score was independently validated with 21 571 DSRs from 65 tertiary hospitals in 2012. The c-statistics of new risk score was computed as a measure of discrimination and was compared with the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and its adaptions for further validation. RESULTS: We finally identified and weighted 22 secondary diagnoses using a logistic regression model. In the external validation, the novel risk score performed better than the widely used CCI in predicting in-hospital mortality of AMI patients (c-statistics: 0.829, 0.832, 0.824 vs. 0.775, 0.773, and 0.710 in training, testing, and validating dataset, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The new risk score developed from DSRs outperform the existing administrative data when applied to healthcare data from China. This risk score can be used for adjusting heterogeneity between hospitals when clinical data from multiple hospitals are included. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2016-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4917324/ /pubmed/27318825 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.899262 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2016 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Qu, Zhi Zhao, Lue Ping Ma, Xiemin Zhan, Siyan Building a Patient-Specific Risk Score with a Large Database of Discharge Summary Reports |
title | Building a Patient-Specific Risk Score with a Large Database of Discharge Summary Reports |
title_full | Building a Patient-Specific Risk Score with a Large Database of Discharge Summary Reports |
title_fullStr | Building a Patient-Specific Risk Score with a Large Database of Discharge Summary Reports |
title_full_unstemmed | Building a Patient-Specific Risk Score with a Large Database of Discharge Summary Reports |
title_short | Building a Patient-Specific Risk Score with a Large Database of Discharge Summary Reports |
title_sort | building a patient-specific risk score with a large database of discharge summary reports |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4917324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27318825 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.899262 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT quzhi buildingapatientspecificriskscorewithalargedatabaseofdischargesummaryreports AT zhaolueping buildingapatientspecificriskscorewithalargedatabaseofdischargesummaryreports AT maxiemin buildingapatientspecificriskscorewithalargedatabaseofdischargesummaryreports AT zhansiyan buildingapatientspecificriskscorewithalargedatabaseofdischargesummaryreports |