Cargando…

Effective and Efficient Stand Magnifier Use in Visually Impaired Children

Purpose: The main objective of this study was to analyze the effectiveness and efficiency of magnifier use in children with visual impairment who did not use a low vision aid earlier, in an ecologically valid goal-directed perceptuomotor task. Methods: Participants were twenty-nine 4- to 8-year-old...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liebrand-Schurink, Joyce, Cox, Ralf F. A., van Rens, Ger H. M. B., Cillessen, Antonius H. N., Meulenbroek, Ruud G. J., Boonstra, Frouke N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4917530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445912
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00944
_version_ 1782438951983775744
author Liebrand-Schurink, Joyce
Cox, Ralf F. A.
van Rens, Ger H. M. B.
Cillessen, Antonius H. N.
Meulenbroek, Ruud G. J.
Boonstra, Frouke N.
author_facet Liebrand-Schurink, Joyce
Cox, Ralf F. A.
van Rens, Ger H. M. B.
Cillessen, Antonius H. N.
Meulenbroek, Ruud G. J.
Boonstra, Frouke N.
author_sort Liebrand-Schurink, Joyce
collection PubMed
description Purpose: The main objective of this study was to analyze the effectiveness and efficiency of magnifier use in children with visual impairment who did not use a low vision aid earlier, in an ecologically valid goal-directed perceptuomotor task. Methods: Participants were twenty-nine 4- to 8-year-old children with visual impairment and 47 age-matched children with normal vision. After seeing a first symbol (an Lea Hyvärinen [LH] symbol), children were instructed to (1) move the stand magnifier as quickly as possible toward a small target symbol (another LH symbol that could only be seen by using the magnifier), (2) compare the two symbols, and (3) move the magnifier to one of two response areas to indicate whether the two symbols were identical. Performance was measured in terms of accuracy, response time, identification time, and movement time. Viewing distance, as well as hand and eye dominance while using the magnifier was assessed. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in accuracy, reaction time, and movement time. Contrary to the prediction, children with visual impairment required less time to identify small symbols than children with normal vision. Both within-subject and between-subject variability in viewing distance were smaller in the visually impaired group than in the normally sighted group. In the visually impaired group, a larger viewing distance was associated with shorter identification time, which in turn was associated with higher accuracy. In the normally sighted group, a faster movement with the magnifier and a faster identification were associated with increasing age. Conclusion: The findings indicate that children with visual impairment can use the stand magnifier adequately and efficiently. The normally sighted children show an age-related development in movement time and identification time and show more variability in viewing distance, which is not found in visually impaired children. Visually impaired children seem to choose a standard but less adaptive strategy in which they primarily used their preferred hand to manipulate the magnifier and their preferred eye to identify the symbol. Trial registration: Registered at http://www.trialregister.nl; NTR2380
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4917530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49175302016-07-21 Effective and Efficient Stand Magnifier Use in Visually Impaired Children Liebrand-Schurink, Joyce Cox, Ralf F. A. van Rens, Ger H. M. B. Cillessen, Antonius H. N. Meulenbroek, Ruud G. J. Boonstra, Frouke N. Front Psychol Psychology Purpose: The main objective of this study was to analyze the effectiveness and efficiency of magnifier use in children with visual impairment who did not use a low vision aid earlier, in an ecologically valid goal-directed perceptuomotor task. Methods: Participants were twenty-nine 4- to 8-year-old children with visual impairment and 47 age-matched children with normal vision. After seeing a first symbol (an Lea Hyvärinen [LH] symbol), children were instructed to (1) move the stand magnifier as quickly as possible toward a small target symbol (another LH symbol that could only be seen by using the magnifier), (2) compare the two symbols, and (3) move the magnifier to one of two response areas to indicate whether the two symbols were identical. Performance was measured in terms of accuracy, response time, identification time, and movement time. Viewing distance, as well as hand and eye dominance while using the magnifier was assessed. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in accuracy, reaction time, and movement time. Contrary to the prediction, children with visual impairment required less time to identify small symbols than children with normal vision. Both within-subject and between-subject variability in viewing distance were smaller in the visually impaired group than in the normally sighted group. In the visually impaired group, a larger viewing distance was associated with shorter identification time, which in turn was associated with higher accuracy. In the normally sighted group, a faster movement with the magnifier and a faster identification were associated with increasing age. Conclusion: The findings indicate that children with visual impairment can use the stand magnifier adequately and efficiently. The normally sighted children show an age-related development in movement time and identification time and show more variability in viewing distance, which is not found in visually impaired children. Visually impaired children seem to choose a standard but less adaptive strategy in which they primarily used their preferred hand to manipulate the magnifier and their preferred eye to identify the symbol. Trial registration: Registered at http://www.trialregister.nl; NTR2380 Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4917530/ /pubmed/27445912 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00944 Text en Copyright © 2016 Liebrand-Schurink, Cox, van Rens, Cillessen, Meulenbroek and Boonstra. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Liebrand-Schurink, Joyce
Cox, Ralf F. A.
van Rens, Ger H. M. B.
Cillessen, Antonius H. N.
Meulenbroek, Ruud G. J.
Boonstra, Frouke N.
Effective and Efficient Stand Magnifier Use in Visually Impaired Children
title Effective and Efficient Stand Magnifier Use in Visually Impaired Children
title_full Effective and Efficient Stand Magnifier Use in Visually Impaired Children
title_fullStr Effective and Efficient Stand Magnifier Use in Visually Impaired Children
title_full_unstemmed Effective and Efficient Stand Magnifier Use in Visually Impaired Children
title_short Effective and Efficient Stand Magnifier Use in Visually Impaired Children
title_sort effective and efficient stand magnifier use in visually impaired children
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4917530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445912
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00944
work_keys_str_mv AT liebrandschurinkjoyce effectiveandefficientstandmagnifieruseinvisuallyimpairedchildren
AT coxralffa effectiveandefficientstandmagnifieruseinvisuallyimpairedchildren
AT vanrensgerhmb effectiveandefficientstandmagnifieruseinvisuallyimpairedchildren
AT cillessenantoniushn effectiveandefficientstandmagnifieruseinvisuallyimpairedchildren
AT meulenbroekruudgj effectiveandefficientstandmagnifieruseinvisuallyimpairedchildren
AT boonstrafrouken effectiveandefficientstandmagnifieruseinvisuallyimpairedchildren