Cargando…

Retinal vein occlusion and the use of a dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®) in its treatment

PURPOSE: To review published data pertaining to the clinical experience with a dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®) with a view to establishing a clinically based therapeutic regime. METHODS: A PubMed search using the MeSH terms “retinal vein occlusion” and either “pathophysiology” or “dexa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garweg, Justus G., Zandi, Souska
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4917582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27178087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-016-3350-x
_version_ 1782438963846316032
author Garweg, Justus G.
Zandi, Souska
author_facet Garweg, Justus G.
Zandi, Souska
author_sort Garweg, Justus G.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To review published data pertaining to the clinical experience with a dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®) with a view to establishing a clinically based therapeutic regime. METHODS: A PubMed search using the MeSH terms “retinal vein occlusion” and either “pathophysiology” or “dexamethasone intravitreal implant” was undertaken for manuscripts published until August 2015. The analysis included studies involving minimally 15 patients under a prospective design or 30 under a retrospective design, a minimal follow up of 6 months, and at least 2 intravitreal Ozurdex® injections per eye. RESULTS: In the vast majority of eyes, satisfactory outcomes were achieved with retreatment intervals of between 3 and 5 months. Initial evidence indicates a similar efficacy compared to anti-VEGF therapies as a first-line treatment. Safety concerns associated with the long-term and repeated use of Ozurdex® are not borne out by clinical findings: its implantation is not associated with a sustained increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) over time or with the number of applications. CONCLUSION: Compared with anti-VEGF therapies, the burden of retreatment is reduced. In patients with chronic macular edema not responsive to repetitive anti-VEGF therapies, the outcome after dexamethasone implant treatment is encouraging. However, these results are achieved at the expense of side effects typically associated with steroids: in up to 20 % of the Ozurdex®-treated patients, an elevation in IOP, which could be medically controlled in the majority of cases, and cataract formation or progression was observed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4917582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49175822016-07-07 Retinal vein occlusion and the use of a dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®) in its treatment Garweg, Justus G. Zandi, Souska Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Review Article PURPOSE: To review published data pertaining to the clinical experience with a dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®) with a view to establishing a clinically based therapeutic regime. METHODS: A PubMed search using the MeSH terms “retinal vein occlusion” and either “pathophysiology” or “dexamethasone intravitreal implant” was undertaken for manuscripts published until August 2015. The analysis included studies involving minimally 15 patients under a prospective design or 30 under a retrospective design, a minimal follow up of 6 months, and at least 2 intravitreal Ozurdex® injections per eye. RESULTS: In the vast majority of eyes, satisfactory outcomes were achieved with retreatment intervals of between 3 and 5 months. Initial evidence indicates a similar efficacy compared to anti-VEGF therapies as a first-line treatment. Safety concerns associated with the long-term and repeated use of Ozurdex® are not borne out by clinical findings: its implantation is not associated with a sustained increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) over time or with the number of applications. CONCLUSION: Compared with anti-VEGF therapies, the burden of retreatment is reduced. In patients with chronic macular edema not responsive to repetitive anti-VEGF therapies, the outcome after dexamethasone implant treatment is encouraging. However, these results are achieved at the expense of side effects typically associated with steroids: in up to 20 % of the Ozurdex®-treated patients, an elevation in IOP, which could be medically controlled in the majority of cases, and cataract formation or progression was observed. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-05-13 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4917582/ /pubmed/27178087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-016-3350-x Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review Article
Garweg, Justus G.
Zandi, Souska
Retinal vein occlusion and the use of a dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®) in its treatment
title Retinal vein occlusion and the use of a dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®) in its treatment
title_full Retinal vein occlusion and the use of a dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®) in its treatment
title_fullStr Retinal vein occlusion and the use of a dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®) in its treatment
title_full_unstemmed Retinal vein occlusion and the use of a dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®) in its treatment
title_short Retinal vein occlusion and the use of a dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®) in its treatment
title_sort retinal vein occlusion and the use of a dexamethasone intravitreal implant (ozurdex®) in its treatment
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4917582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27178087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-016-3350-x
work_keys_str_mv AT garwegjustusg retinalveinocclusionandtheuseofadexamethasoneintravitrealimplantozurdexinitstreatment
AT zandisouska retinalveinocclusionandtheuseofadexamethasoneintravitrealimplantozurdexinitstreatment