Cargando…

Effect of propofol and remifentanil on cerebral perfusion and oxygenation in pigs: a systematic review

The objective of this review is to evaluate the existing literature with regard to the influence of propofol and remifentanil total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) on cerebral perfusion and oxygenation in healthy pigs. Anaesthesia has influence on cerebral haemodynamics and it is important not only i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mikkelsen, Mai Louise Grandsgaard, Ambrus, Rikard, Miles, James Edward, Poulsen, Helle Harding, Moltke, Finn Borgbjerg, Eriksen, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4917978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27334375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-016-0223-6
_version_ 1782439035450425344
author Mikkelsen, Mai Louise Grandsgaard
Ambrus, Rikard
Miles, James Edward
Poulsen, Helle Harding
Moltke, Finn Borgbjerg
Eriksen, Thomas
author_facet Mikkelsen, Mai Louise Grandsgaard
Ambrus, Rikard
Miles, James Edward
Poulsen, Helle Harding
Moltke, Finn Borgbjerg
Eriksen, Thomas
author_sort Mikkelsen, Mai Louise Grandsgaard
collection PubMed
description The objective of this review is to evaluate the existing literature with regard to the influence of propofol and remifentanil total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) on cerebral perfusion and oxygenation in healthy pigs. Anaesthesia has influence on cerebral haemodynamics and it is important not only in human but also in veterinary anaesthesia to preserve optimal regulation of cerebral haemodynamics. Propofol and remifentanil are widely used in neuroanaesthesia and are increasingly used in experimental animal studies. In translational models, the pig has advantages compared to small laboratory animals because of brain anatomy, metabolism, neurophysiological maturation, and cerebral haemodynamics. However, reported effects of propofol and remifentanil on cerebral perfusion and oxygenation in pigs have not been reviewed. An electronic search identified 99 articles in English. Title and abstract screening selected 29 articles for full-text evaluation of which 19 were excluded with reasons. Of the 10 peer-reviewed articles included for review, only three had propofol or remifentanil anaesthesia as the primary study objective and only two directly investigated the effect of anaesthesia on cerebral perfusion and oxygenation (CPO). The evidence evaluated in this systematic review is limited, not focused on propofol and remifentanil and possibly influenced by factors of potential importance for CPO assessment. In one study of healthy pigs, CPO measures were within normal ranges following propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia, and addition of a single remifentanil bolus did not affect regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO(2)). Even though the pool of evidence suggests that propofol and remifentanil alone or in combination have limited effects on CPO in healthy pigs, confirmative evidence is lacking.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4917978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49179782016-06-24 Effect of propofol and remifentanil on cerebral perfusion and oxygenation in pigs: a systematic review Mikkelsen, Mai Louise Grandsgaard Ambrus, Rikard Miles, James Edward Poulsen, Helle Harding Moltke, Finn Borgbjerg Eriksen, Thomas Acta Vet Scand Review The objective of this review is to evaluate the existing literature with regard to the influence of propofol and remifentanil total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) on cerebral perfusion and oxygenation in healthy pigs. Anaesthesia has influence on cerebral haemodynamics and it is important not only in human but also in veterinary anaesthesia to preserve optimal regulation of cerebral haemodynamics. Propofol and remifentanil are widely used in neuroanaesthesia and are increasingly used in experimental animal studies. In translational models, the pig has advantages compared to small laboratory animals because of brain anatomy, metabolism, neurophysiological maturation, and cerebral haemodynamics. However, reported effects of propofol and remifentanil on cerebral perfusion and oxygenation in pigs have not been reviewed. An electronic search identified 99 articles in English. Title and abstract screening selected 29 articles for full-text evaluation of which 19 were excluded with reasons. Of the 10 peer-reviewed articles included for review, only three had propofol or remifentanil anaesthesia as the primary study objective and only two directly investigated the effect of anaesthesia on cerebral perfusion and oxygenation (CPO). The evidence evaluated in this systematic review is limited, not focused on propofol and remifentanil and possibly influenced by factors of potential importance for CPO assessment. In one study of healthy pigs, CPO measures were within normal ranges following propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia, and addition of a single remifentanil bolus did not affect regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO(2)). Even though the pool of evidence suggests that propofol and remifentanil alone or in combination have limited effects on CPO in healthy pigs, confirmative evidence is lacking. BioMed Central 2016-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4917978/ /pubmed/27334375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-016-0223-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Mikkelsen, Mai Louise Grandsgaard
Ambrus, Rikard
Miles, James Edward
Poulsen, Helle Harding
Moltke, Finn Borgbjerg
Eriksen, Thomas
Effect of propofol and remifentanil on cerebral perfusion and oxygenation in pigs: a systematic review
title Effect of propofol and remifentanil on cerebral perfusion and oxygenation in pigs: a systematic review
title_full Effect of propofol and remifentanil on cerebral perfusion and oxygenation in pigs: a systematic review
title_fullStr Effect of propofol and remifentanil on cerebral perfusion and oxygenation in pigs: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Effect of propofol and remifentanil on cerebral perfusion and oxygenation in pigs: a systematic review
title_short Effect of propofol and remifentanil on cerebral perfusion and oxygenation in pigs: a systematic review
title_sort effect of propofol and remifentanil on cerebral perfusion and oxygenation in pigs: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4917978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27334375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-016-0223-6
work_keys_str_mv AT mikkelsenmailouisegrandsgaard effectofpropofolandremifentaniloncerebralperfusionandoxygenationinpigsasystematicreview
AT ambrusrikard effectofpropofolandremifentaniloncerebralperfusionandoxygenationinpigsasystematicreview
AT milesjamesedward effectofpropofolandremifentaniloncerebralperfusionandoxygenationinpigsasystematicreview
AT poulsenhelleharding effectofpropofolandremifentaniloncerebralperfusionandoxygenationinpigsasystematicreview
AT moltkefinnborgbjerg effectofpropofolandremifentaniloncerebralperfusionandoxygenationinpigsasystematicreview
AT eriksenthomas effectofpropofolandremifentaniloncerebralperfusionandoxygenationinpigsasystematicreview