Cargando…

Current Guidelines, Common Clinical Pitfalls, and Future Directions for Laboratory Diagnosis of Lyme Disease, United States

In the United States, Lyme disease is caused by Borrelia burgdorferi and transmitted to humans by blacklegged ticks. Patients with an erythema migrans lesion and epidemiologic risk can receive a diagnosis without laboratory testing. For all other patients, laboratory testing is necessary to confirm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moore, Andrew, Nelson, Christina, Molins, Claudia, Mead, Paul, Schriefer, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4918152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27314832
http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2207.151694
_version_ 1782439068115664896
author Moore, Andrew
Nelson, Christina
Molins, Claudia
Mead, Paul
Schriefer, Martin
author_facet Moore, Andrew
Nelson, Christina
Molins, Claudia
Mead, Paul
Schriefer, Martin
author_sort Moore, Andrew
collection PubMed
description In the United States, Lyme disease is caused by Borrelia burgdorferi and transmitted to humans by blacklegged ticks. Patients with an erythema migrans lesion and epidemiologic risk can receive a diagnosis without laboratory testing. For all other patients, laboratory testing is necessary to confirm the diagnosis, but proper interpretation depends on symptoms and timing of illness. The recommended laboratory test in the United States is 2-tiered serologic analysis consisting of an enzyme-linked immunoassay or immunofluorescence assay, followed by reflexive immunoblotting. Sensitivity of 2-tiered testing is low (30%–40%) during early infection while the antibody response is developing (window period). For disseminated Lyme disease, sensitivity is 70%–100%. Specificity is high (>95%) during all stages of disease. Use of other diagnostic tests for Lyme disease is limited. We review the rationale behind current US testing guidelines, appropriate use and interpretation of tests, and recent developments in Lyme disease diagnostics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4918152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49181522016-07-01 Current Guidelines, Common Clinical Pitfalls, and Future Directions for Laboratory Diagnosis of Lyme Disease, United States Moore, Andrew Nelson, Christina Molins, Claudia Mead, Paul Schriefer, Martin Emerg Infect Dis Synopsis In the United States, Lyme disease is caused by Borrelia burgdorferi and transmitted to humans by blacklegged ticks. Patients with an erythema migrans lesion and epidemiologic risk can receive a diagnosis without laboratory testing. For all other patients, laboratory testing is necessary to confirm the diagnosis, but proper interpretation depends on symptoms and timing of illness. The recommended laboratory test in the United States is 2-tiered serologic analysis consisting of an enzyme-linked immunoassay or immunofluorescence assay, followed by reflexive immunoblotting. Sensitivity of 2-tiered testing is low (30%–40%) during early infection while the antibody response is developing (window period). For disseminated Lyme disease, sensitivity is 70%–100%. Specificity is high (>95%) during all stages of disease. Use of other diagnostic tests for Lyme disease is limited. We review the rationale behind current US testing guidelines, appropriate use and interpretation of tests, and recent developments in Lyme disease diagnostics. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2016-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4918152/ /pubmed/27314832 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2207.151694 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Synopsis
Moore, Andrew
Nelson, Christina
Molins, Claudia
Mead, Paul
Schriefer, Martin
Current Guidelines, Common Clinical Pitfalls, and Future Directions for Laboratory Diagnosis of Lyme Disease, United States
title Current Guidelines, Common Clinical Pitfalls, and Future Directions for Laboratory Diagnosis of Lyme Disease, United States
title_full Current Guidelines, Common Clinical Pitfalls, and Future Directions for Laboratory Diagnosis of Lyme Disease, United States
title_fullStr Current Guidelines, Common Clinical Pitfalls, and Future Directions for Laboratory Diagnosis of Lyme Disease, United States
title_full_unstemmed Current Guidelines, Common Clinical Pitfalls, and Future Directions for Laboratory Diagnosis of Lyme Disease, United States
title_short Current Guidelines, Common Clinical Pitfalls, and Future Directions for Laboratory Diagnosis of Lyme Disease, United States
title_sort current guidelines, common clinical pitfalls, and future directions for laboratory diagnosis of lyme disease, united states
topic Synopsis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4918152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27314832
http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2207.151694
work_keys_str_mv AT mooreandrew currentguidelinescommonclinicalpitfallsandfuturedirectionsforlaboratorydiagnosisoflymediseaseunitedstates
AT nelsonchristina currentguidelinescommonclinicalpitfallsandfuturedirectionsforlaboratorydiagnosisoflymediseaseunitedstates
AT molinsclaudia currentguidelinescommonclinicalpitfallsandfuturedirectionsforlaboratorydiagnosisoflymediseaseunitedstates
AT meadpaul currentguidelinescommonclinicalpitfallsandfuturedirectionsforlaboratorydiagnosisoflymediseaseunitedstates
AT schriefermartin currentguidelinescommonclinicalpitfallsandfuturedirectionsforlaboratorydiagnosisoflymediseaseunitedstates