Cargando…
Current Guidelines, Common Clinical Pitfalls, and Future Directions for Laboratory Diagnosis of Lyme Disease, United States
In the United States, Lyme disease is caused by Borrelia burgdorferi and transmitted to humans by blacklegged ticks. Patients with an erythema migrans lesion and epidemiologic risk can receive a diagnosis without laboratory testing. For all other patients, laboratory testing is necessary to confirm...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4918152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27314832 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2207.151694 |
_version_ | 1782439068115664896 |
---|---|
author | Moore, Andrew Nelson, Christina Molins, Claudia Mead, Paul Schriefer, Martin |
author_facet | Moore, Andrew Nelson, Christina Molins, Claudia Mead, Paul Schriefer, Martin |
author_sort | Moore, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the United States, Lyme disease is caused by Borrelia burgdorferi and transmitted to humans by blacklegged ticks. Patients with an erythema migrans lesion and epidemiologic risk can receive a diagnosis without laboratory testing. For all other patients, laboratory testing is necessary to confirm the diagnosis, but proper interpretation depends on symptoms and timing of illness. The recommended laboratory test in the United States is 2-tiered serologic analysis consisting of an enzyme-linked immunoassay or immunofluorescence assay, followed by reflexive immunoblotting. Sensitivity of 2-tiered testing is low (30%–40%) during early infection while the antibody response is developing (window period). For disseminated Lyme disease, sensitivity is 70%–100%. Specificity is high (>95%) during all stages of disease. Use of other diagnostic tests for Lyme disease is limited. We review the rationale behind current US testing guidelines, appropriate use and interpretation of tests, and recent developments in Lyme disease diagnostics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4918152 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49181522016-07-01 Current Guidelines, Common Clinical Pitfalls, and Future Directions for Laboratory Diagnosis of Lyme Disease, United States Moore, Andrew Nelson, Christina Molins, Claudia Mead, Paul Schriefer, Martin Emerg Infect Dis Synopsis In the United States, Lyme disease is caused by Borrelia burgdorferi and transmitted to humans by blacklegged ticks. Patients with an erythema migrans lesion and epidemiologic risk can receive a diagnosis without laboratory testing. For all other patients, laboratory testing is necessary to confirm the diagnosis, but proper interpretation depends on symptoms and timing of illness. The recommended laboratory test in the United States is 2-tiered serologic analysis consisting of an enzyme-linked immunoassay or immunofluorescence assay, followed by reflexive immunoblotting. Sensitivity of 2-tiered testing is low (30%–40%) during early infection while the antibody response is developing (window period). For disseminated Lyme disease, sensitivity is 70%–100%. Specificity is high (>95%) during all stages of disease. Use of other diagnostic tests for Lyme disease is limited. We review the rationale behind current US testing guidelines, appropriate use and interpretation of tests, and recent developments in Lyme disease diagnostics. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2016-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4918152/ /pubmed/27314832 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2207.151694 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Synopsis Moore, Andrew Nelson, Christina Molins, Claudia Mead, Paul Schriefer, Martin Current Guidelines, Common Clinical Pitfalls, and Future Directions for Laboratory Diagnosis of Lyme Disease, United States |
title | Current Guidelines, Common Clinical Pitfalls, and Future Directions for Laboratory Diagnosis of Lyme Disease, United States |
title_full | Current Guidelines, Common Clinical Pitfalls, and Future Directions for Laboratory Diagnosis of Lyme Disease, United States |
title_fullStr | Current Guidelines, Common Clinical Pitfalls, and Future Directions for Laboratory Diagnosis of Lyme Disease, United States |
title_full_unstemmed | Current Guidelines, Common Clinical Pitfalls, and Future Directions for Laboratory Diagnosis of Lyme Disease, United States |
title_short | Current Guidelines, Common Clinical Pitfalls, and Future Directions for Laboratory Diagnosis of Lyme Disease, United States |
title_sort | current guidelines, common clinical pitfalls, and future directions for laboratory diagnosis of lyme disease, united states |
topic | Synopsis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4918152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27314832 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2207.151694 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mooreandrew currentguidelinescommonclinicalpitfallsandfuturedirectionsforlaboratorydiagnosisoflymediseaseunitedstates AT nelsonchristina currentguidelinescommonclinicalpitfallsandfuturedirectionsforlaboratorydiagnosisoflymediseaseunitedstates AT molinsclaudia currentguidelinescommonclinicalpitfallsandfuturedirectionsforlaboratorydiagnosisoflymediseaseunitedstates AT meadpaul currentguidelinescommonclinicalpitfallsandfuturedirectionsforlaboratorydiagnosisoflymediseaseunitedstates AT schriefermartin currentguidelinescommonclinicalpitfallsandfuturedirectionsforlaboratorydiagnosisoflymediseaseunitedstates |