Cargando…
Genome-wide selective sweeps and gene-specific sweeps in natural bacterial populations
Multiple models describe the formation and evolution of distinct microbial phylogenetic groups. These evolutionary models make different predictions regarding how adaptive alleles spread through populations and how genetic diversity is maintained. Processes predicted by competing evolutionary models...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4918448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26744812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.241 |
_version_ | 1782439119416197120 |
---|---|
author | Bendall, Matthew L Stevens, Sarah LR Chan, Leong-Keat Malfatti, Stephanie Schwientek, Patrick Tremblay, Julien Schackwitz, Wendy Martin, Joel Pati, Amrita Bushnell, Brian Froula, Jeff Kang, Dongwan Tringe, Susannah G Bertilsson, Stefan Moran, Mary A Shade, Ashley Newton, Ryan J McMahon, Katherine D Malmstrom, Rex R |
author_facet | Bendall, Matthew L Stevens, Sarah LR Chan, Leong-Keat Malfatti, Stephanie Schwientek, Patrick Tremblay, Julien Schackwitz, Wendy Martin, Joel Pati, Amrita Bushnell, Brian Froula, Jeff Kang, Dongwan Tringe, Susannah G Bertilsson, Stefan Moran, Mary A Shade, Ashley Newton, Ryan J McMahon, Katherine D Malmstrom, Rex R |
author_sort | Bendall, Matthew L |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multiple models describe the formation and evolution of distinct microbial phylogenetic groups. These evolutionary models make different predictions regarding how adaptive alleles spread through populations and how genetic diversity is maintained. Processes predicted by competing evolutionary models, for example, genome-wide selective sweeps vs gene-specific sweeps, could be captured in natural populations using time-series metagenomics if the approach were applied over a sufficiently long time frame. Direct observations of either process would help resolve how distinct microbial groups evolve. Here, from a 9-year metagenomic study of a freshwater lake (2005–2013), we explore changes in single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) frequencies and patterns of gene gain and loss in 30 bacterial populations. SNP analyses revealed substantial genetic heterogeneity within these populations, although the degree of heterogeneity varied by >1000-fold among populations. SNP allele frequencies also changed dramatically over time within some populations. Interestingly, nearly all SNP variants were slowly purged over several years from one population of green sulfur bacteria, while at the same time multiple genes either swept through or were lost from this population. These patterns were consistent with a genome-wide selective sweep in progress, a process predicted by the ‘ecotype model' of speciation but not previously observed in nature. In contrast, other populations contained large, SNP-free genomic regions that appear to have swept independently through the populations prior to the study without purging diversity elsewhere in the genome. Evidence for both genome-wide and gene-specific sweeps suggests that different models of bacterial speciation may apply to different populations coexisting in the same environment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4918448 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49184482016-07-13 Genome-wide selective sweeps and gene-specific sweeps in natural bacterial populations Bendall, Matthew L Stevens, Sarah LR Chan, Leong-Keat Malfatti, Stephanie Schwientek, Patrick Tremblay, Julien Schackwitz, Wendy Martin, Joel Pati, Amrita Bushnell, Brian Froula, Jeff Kang, Dongwan Tringe, Susannah G Bertilsson, Stefan Moran, Mary A Shade, Ashley Newton, Ryan J McMahon, Katherine D Malmstrom, Rex R ISME J Original Article Multiple models describe the formation and evolution of distinct microbial phylogenetic groups. These evolutionary models make different predictions regarding how adaptive alleles spread through populations and how genetic diversity is maintained. Processes predicted by competing evolutionary models, for example, genome-wide selective sweeps vs gene-specific sweeps, could be captured in natural populations using time-series metagenomics if the approach were applied over a sufficiently long time frame. Direct observations of either process would help resolve how distinct microbial groups evolve. Here, from a 9-year metagenomic study of a freshwater lake (2005–2013), we explore changes in single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) frequencies and patterns of gene gain and loss in 30 bacterial populations. SNP analyses revealed substantial genetic heterogeneity within these populations, although the degree of heterogeneity varied by >1000-fold among populations. SNP allele frequencies also changed dramatically over time within some populations. Interestingly, nearly all SNP variants were slowly purged over several years from one population of green sulfur bacteria, while at the same time multiple genes either swept through or were lost from this population. These patterns were consistent with a genome-wide selective sweep in progress, a process predicted by the ‘ecotype model' of speciation but not previously observed in nature. In contrast, other populations contained large, SNP-free genomic regions that appear to have swept independently through the populations prior to the study without purging diversity elsewhere in the genome. Evidence for both genome-wide and gene-specific sweeps suggests that different models of bacterial speciation may apply to different populations coexisting in the same environment. Nature Publishing Group 2016-07 2016-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4918448/ /pubmed/26744812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.241 Text en Copyright © 2016 International Society for Microbial Ecology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bendall, Matthew L Stevens, Sarah LR Chan, Leong-Keat Malfatti, Stephanie Schwientek, Patrick Tremblay, Julien Schackwitz, Wendy Martin, Joel Pati, Amrita Bushnell, Brian Froula, Jeff Kang, Dongwan Tringe, Susannah G Bertilsson, Stefan Moran, Mary A Shade, Ashley Newton, Ryan J McMahon, Katherine D Malmstrom, Rex R Genome-wide selective sweeps and gene-specific sweeps in natural bacterial populations |
title | Genome-wide selective sweeps and gene-specific sweeps in natural bacterial populations |
title_full | Genome-wide selective sweeps and gene-specific sweeps in natural bacterial populations |
title_fullStr | Genome-wide selective sweeps and gene-specific sweeps in natural bacterial populations |
title_full_unstemmed | Genome-wide selective sweeps and gene-specific sweeps in natural bacterial populations |
title_short | Genome-wide selective sweeps and gene-specific sweeps in natural bacterial populations |
title_sort | genome-wide selective sweeps and gene-specific sweeps in natural bacterial populations |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4918448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26744812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.241 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bendallmatthewl genomewideselectivesweepsandgenespecificsweepsinnaturalbacterialpopulations AT stevenssarahlr genomewideselectivesweepsandgenespecificsweepsinnaturalbacterialpopulations AT chanleongkeat genomewideselectivesweepsandgenespecificsweepsinnaturalbacterialpopulations AT malfattistephanie genomewideselectivesweepsandgenespecificsweepsinnaturalbacterialpopulations AT schwientekpatrick genomewideselectivesweepsandgenespecificsweepsinnaturalbacterialpopulations AT tremblayjulien genomewideselectivesweepsandgenespecificsweepsinnaturalbacterialpopulations AT schackwitzwendy genomewideselectivesweepsandgenespecificsweepsinnaturalbacterialpopulations AT martinjoel genomewideselectivesweepsandgenespecificsweepsinnaturalbacterialpopulations AT patiamrita genomewideselectivesweepsandgenespecificsweepsinnaturalbacterialpopulations AT bushnellbrian genomewideselectivesweepsandgenespecificsweepsinnaturalbacterialpopulations AT froulajeff genomewideselectivesweepsandgenespecificsweepsinnaturalbacterialpopulations AT kangdongwan genomewideselectivesweepsandgenespecificsweepsinnaturalbacterialpopulations AT tringesusannahg genomewideselectivesweepsandgenespecificsweepsinnaturalbacterialpopulations AT bertilssonstefan genomewideselectivesweepsandgenespecificsweepsinnaturalbacterialpopulations AT moranmarya genomewideselectivesweepsandgenespecificsweepsinnaturalbacterialpopulations AT shadeashley genomewideselectivesweepsandgenespecificsweepsinnaturalbacterialpopulations AT newtonryanj genomewideselectivesweepsandgenespecificsweepsinnaturalbacterialpopulations AT mcmahonkatherined genomewideselectivesweepsandgenespecificsweepsinnaturalbacterialpopulations AT malmstromrexr genomewideselectivesweepsandgenespecificsweepsinnaturalbacterialpopulations |