Cargando…
The acute physiological stress response to an emergency alarm and mobilization during the day and at night
The purpose of this study was to investigate the acute physiological stress response to an emergency alarm and mobilization during the day and at night. Sixteen healthy males aged 25 ± 4 years (mean ± SD) spent four consecutive days and nights in a sleep laboratory. This research used a within-parti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4918669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27157688 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.181998 |
_version_ | 1782439148669370368 |
---|---|
author | Hall, Sarah J Aisbett, Brad Tait, Jamie L Turner, Anne I Ferguson, Sally A Main, Luana C |
author_facet | Hall, Sarah J Aisbett, Brad Tait, Jamie L Turner, Anne I Ferguson, Sally A Main, Luana C |
author_sort | Hall, Sarah J |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to investigate the acute physiological stress response to an emergency alarm and mobilization during the day and at night. Sixteen healthy males aged 25 ± 4 years (mean ± SD) spent four consecutive days and nights in a sleep laboratory. This research used a within-participants design with repeated measures for time, alarm condition (alarm or control), and trial (day or night). When an alarm sounded, participants were required to mobilize immediately. Saliva samples for cortisol analysis were collected 0 min, 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 60 min, 90 min, and 120 min after mobilization, and at corresponding times in control conditions. Heart rate was measured continuously throughout the study. Heart rate was higher in the day (F(20,442) = 9.140, P < 0.001) and night (F(23,459) = 8.356, P < 0.001) alarm conditions compared to the respective control conditions. There was no difference in saliva cortisol between day alarm and day control conditions. Cortisol was higher (F(6,183) = 2.450, P < 0.001) following the night alarm and mobilization compared to the night control condition. The magnitude of difference in cortisol between night control and night alarm conditions was greater (F(6,174) = 4.071, P < 0.001) than the magnitude of difference between the day control and day alarm conditions. The augmented heart rate response to the day and night alarms supports previous observations in field settings. Variations in the cortisol responses between conditions across the day and night may relate to differences in participants’ ability to interpret the alarm when sleeping versus when awake. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4918669 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49186692016-07-14 The acute physiological stress response to an emergency alarm and mobilization during the day and at night Hall, Sarah J Aisbett, Brad Tait, Jamie L Turner, Anne I Ferguson, Sally A Main, Luana C Noise Health Original Article The purpose of this study was to investigate the acute physiological stress response to an emergency alarm and mobilization during the day and at night. Sixteen healthy males aged 25 ± 4 years (mean ± SD) spent four consecutive days and nights in a sleep laboratory. This research used a within-participants design with repeated measures for time, alarm condition (alarm or control), and trial (day or night). When an alarm sounded, participants were required to mobilize immediately. Saliva samples for cortisol analysis were collected 0 min, 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 60 min, 90 min, and 120 min after mobilization, and at corresponding times in control conditions. Heart rate was measured continuously throughout the study. Heart rate was higher in the day (F(20,442) = 9.140, P < 0.001) and night (F(23,459) = 8.356, P < 0.001) alarm conditions compared to the respective control conditions. There was no difference in saliva cortisol between day alarm and day control conditions. Cortisol was higher (F(6,183) = 2.450, P < 0.001) following the night alarm and mobilization compared to the night control condition. The magnitude of difference in cortisol between night control and night alarm conditions was greater (F(6,174) = 4.071, P < 0.001) than the magnitude of difference between the day control and day alarm conditions. The augmented heart rate response to the day and night alarms supports previous observations in field settings. Variations in the cortisol responses between conditions across the day and night may relate to differences in participants’ ability to interpret the alarm when sleeping versus when awake. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4918669/ /pubmed/27157688 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.181998 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Noise & Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hall, Sarah J Aisbett, Brad Tait, Jamie L Turner, Anne I Ferguson, Sally A Main, Luana C The acute physiological stress response to an emergency alarm and mobilization during the day and at night |
title | The acute physiological stress response to an emergency alarm and mobilization during the day and at night |
title_full | The acute physiological stress response to an emergency alarm and mobilization during the day and at night |
title_fullStr | The acute physiological stress response to an emergency alarm and mobilization during the day and at night |
title_full_unstemmed | The acute physiological stress response to an emergency alarm and mobilization during the day and at night |
title_short | The acute physiological stress response to an emergency alarm and mobilization during the day and at night |
title_sort | acute physiological stress response to an emergency alarm and mobilization during the day and at night |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4918669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27157688 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.181998 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hallsarahj theacutephysiologicalstressresponsetoanemergencyalarmandmobilizationduringthedayandatnight AT aisbettbrad theacutephysiologicalstressresponsetoanemergencyalarmandmobilizationduringthedayandatnight AT taitjamiel theacutephysiologicalstressresponsetoanemergencyalarmandmobilizationduringthedayandatnight AT turnerannei theacutephysiologicalstressresponsetoanemergencyalarmandmobilizationduringthedayandatnight AT fergusonsallya theacutephysiologicalstressresponsetoanemergencyalarmandmobilizationduringthedayandatnight AT mainluanac theacutephysiologicalstressresponsetoanemergencyalarmandmobilizationduringthedayandatnight AT hallsarahj acutephysiologicalstressresponsetoanemergencyalarmandmobilizationduringthedayandatnight AT aisbettbrad acutephysiologicalstressresponsetoanemergencyalarmandmobilizationduringthedayandatnight AT taitjamiel acutephysiologicalstressresponsetoanemergencyalarmandmobilizationduringthedayandatnight AT turnerannei acutephysiologicalstressresponsetoanemergencyalarmandmobilizationduringthedayandatnight AT fergusonsallya acutephysiologicalstressresponsetoanemergencyalarmandmobilizationduringthedayandatnight AT mainluanac acutephysiologicalstressresponsetoanemergencyalarmandmobilizationduringthedayandatnight |