Cargando…

Risk assessment of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in the workplace

OBJECTIVES: A hazard assessment of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), a commonly used workplace chemical, was conducted in order to protect the occupational health of workers. A literature review, consisting of both domestic and international references, examined the chemical management system, work...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kim, Hyeon-Yeong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Environmental Health and Toxicology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4919054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27188279
http://dx.doi.org/10.5620/eht.e2016011
_version_ 1782439201280622592
author Kim, Hyeon-Yeong
author_facet Kim, Hyeon-Yeong
author_sort Kim, Hyeon-Yeong
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: A hazard assessment of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), a commonly used workplace chemical, was conducted in order to protect the occupational health of workers. A literature review, consisting of both domestic and international references, examined the chemical management system, working environment, level of exposure, and possible associated risks. This information may be utilized in the future to determine appropriate exposure levels in working environments. METHODS: Hazard assessment was performed using chemical hazard information obtained from international agencies, such as Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development-generated Screening Information Data Set and International Program on Chemical Safety. Information was obtained from surveys conducted by the Minister of Employment and Labor (“Survey on the work environment”) and by the Ministry of Environment (“Survey on the circulation amount of chemicals”). Risk was determined according to exposure in workplaces and chemical hazard. RESULTS: In 229 workplaces over the country, 831 tons of DEHP have been used as plasticizers, insecticides, and ink solvent. Calculated 50% lethal dose values ranged from 14.2 to 50 g/kg, as determined via acute toxicity testing in rodents. Chronic carcinogenicity tests revealed cases of lung and liver degeneration, shrinkage of the testes, and liver cancer. The no-observed-adverse-effect level and the lowest-observed-adverse-effect level were determined to be 28.9 g/kg and 146.6 g/kg, respectively. The working environment assessment revealed the maximum exposure level to be 0.990 mg/m(3), as compared to the threshold exposure level of 5 mg/m(3). The relative risk of chronic toxicity and reproductive toxicity were 0.264 and 0.330, respectively, while the risk of carcinogenicity was 1.3, which is higher than the accepted safety value of one. CONCLUSIONS: DEHP was identified as a carcinogen, and may be dangerous even at concentrations lower than the occupational exposure limit. Therefore, we suggest management of working environments, with exposure levels below 5 mg/m(3) and all workers utilizing local exhaust ventilation and respiratory protection when handling DEHP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4919054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Society of Environmental Health and Toxicology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49190542016-07-07 Risk assessment of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in the workplace Kim, Hyeon-Yeong Environ Health Toxicol Original Article OBJECTIVES: A hazard assessment of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), a commonly used workplace chemical, was conducted in order to protect the occupational health of workers. A literature review, consisting of both domestic and international references, examined the chemical management system, working environment, level of exposure, and possible associated risks. This information may be utilized in the future to determine appropriate exposure levels in working environments. METHODS: Hazard assessment was performed using chemical hazard information obtained from international agencies, such as Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development-generated Screening Information Data Set and International Program on Chemical Safety. Information was obtained from surveys conducted by the Minister of Employment and Labor (“Survey on the work environment”) and by the Ministry of Environment (“Survey on the circulation amount of chemicals”). Risk was determined according to exposure in workplaces and chemical hazard. RESULTS: In 229 workplaces over the country, 831 tons of DEHP have been used as plasticizers, insecticides, and ink solvent. Calculated 50% lethal dose values ranged from 14.2 to 50 g/kg, as determined via acute toxicity testing in rodents. Chronic carcinogenicity tests revealed cases of lung and liver degeneration, shrinkage of the testes, and liver cancer. The no-observed-adverse-effect level and the lowest-observed-adverse-effect level were determined to be 28.9 g/kg and 146.6 g/kg, respectively. The working environment assessment revealed the maximum exposure level to be 0.990 mg/m(3), as compared to the threshold exposure level of 5 mg/m(3). The relative risk of chronic toxicity and reproductive toxicity were 0.264 and 0.330, respectively, while the risk of carcinogenicity was 1.3, which is higher than the accepted safety value of one. CONCLUSIONS: DEHP was identified as a carcinogen, and may be dangerous even at concentrations lower than the occupational exposure limit. Therefore, we suggest management of working environments, with exposure levels below 5 mg/m(3) and all workers utilizing local exhaust ventilation and respiratory protection when handling DEHP. The Korean Society of Environmental Health and Toxicology 2016-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4919054/ /pubmed/27188279 http://dx.doi.org/10.5620/eht.e2016011 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Korean Society of Environmental Health and Toxicology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Hyeon-Yeong
Risk assessment of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in the workplace
title Risk assessment of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in the workplace
title_full Risk assessment of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in the workplace
title_fullStr Risk assessment of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in the workplace
title_full_unstemmed Risk assessment of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in the workplace
title_short Risk assessment of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in the workplace
title_sort risk assessment of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in the workplace
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4919054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27188279
http://dx.doi.org/10.5620/eht.e2016011
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhyeonyeong riskassessmentofdi2ethylhexylphthalateintheworkplace