Cargando…

Treatment of Adults with Lennox–Gastaut Syndrome: Further Analysis of Efficacy and Safety/Tolerability of Rufinamide

INTRODUCTION: Management of Lennox–Gastaut syndrome (LGS) in adulthood can be particularly challenging. Published reports describing the use of rufinamide specifically in adult patients with LGS are scarce. A post hoc subgroup analysis of data from a phase III trial was conducted to investigate the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McMurray, Rob, Striano, Pasquale
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4919131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26861566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40120-016-0041-9
_version_ 1782439214322810880
author McMurray, Rob
Striano, Pasquale
author_facet McMurray, Rob
Striano, Pasquale
author_sort McMurray, Rob
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Management of Lennox–Gastaut syndrome (LGS) in adulthood can be particularly challenging. Published reports describing the use of rufinamide specifically in adult patients with LGS are scarce. A post hoc subgroup analysis of data from a phase III trial was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety/tolerability of rufinamide in adults with LGS. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in patients with LGS, aged 4 years and above. During an 84-day, double-blind treatment period, patients received either adjunctive rufinamide therapy or placebo. Efficacy and safety/tolerability were assessed in a post hoc subgroup analysis of adult patients (≥18 years). Efficacy was assessed as change from baseline in 28-day seizure frequency, 50% responder rate, and seizure freedom rate; each calculated for total seizures and drop attacks. Safety/tolerability assessments included the evaluation of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Thirty-one adults aged 18–37 years with LGS received treatment with either rufinamide (n = 21) or placebo (n = 10). Three patients in the rufinamide group did not complete the trial. The median change from baseline in seizure frequency was −31.5% for rufinamide versus +22.1% for placebo (P = 0.008) for all seizures and −54.9% versus +21.7% (P = 0.002) for drop attacks. Responder rates were 33.3% for rufinamide versus 0% for placebo (P = 0.066) for all seizures and 57.1% versus 10.0% (P = 0.020) for drop attacks. No patient achieved freedom from all seizures but two rufinamide-treated patients (9.5%) became free of drop attacks. Overall, 71.4% of patients treated with rufinamide and 60.0% of patients treated with placebo experienced AEs; most commonly, somnolence (33.3% vs. 20.0%) and vomiting (19.0% vs. 0%). Most AEs were of mild or moderate intensity. CONCLUSION: Rufinamide demonstrated favorable efficacy and was generally well tolerated when used as adjunctive treatment for adults with LGS. FUNDING: Eisai. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40120-016-0041-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4919131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49191312016-07-12 Treatment of Adults with Lennox–Gastaut Syndrome: Further Analysis of Efficacy and Safety/Tolerability of Rufinamide McMurray, Rob Striano, Pasquale Neurol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Management of Lennox–Gastaut syndrome (LGS) in adulthood can be particularly challenging. Published reports describing the use of rufinamide specifically in adult patients with LGS are scarce. A post hoc subgroup analysis of data from a phase III trial was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety/tolerability of rufinamide in adults with LGS. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in patients with LGS, aged 4 years and above. During an 84-day, double-blind treatment period, patients received either adjunctive rufinamide therapy or placebo. Efficacy and safety/tolerability were assessed in a post hoc subgroup analysis of adult patients (≥18 years). Efficacy was assessed as change from baseline in 28-day seizure frequency, 50% responder rate, and seizure freedom rate; each calculated for total seizures and drop attacks. Safety/tolerability assessments included the evaluation of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Thirty-one adults aged 18–37 years with LGS received treatment with either rufinamide (n = 21) or placebo (n = 10). Three patients in the rufinamide group did not complete the trial. The median change from baseline in seizure frequency was −31.5% for rufinamide versus +22.1% for placebo (P = 0.008) for all seizures and −54.9% versus +21.7% (P = 0.002) for drop attacks. Responder rates were 33.3% for rufinamide versus 0% for placebo (P = 0.066) for all seizures and 57.1% versus 10.0% (P = 0.020) for drop attacks. No patient achieved freedom from all seizures but two rufinamide-treated patients (9.5%) became free of drop attacks. Overall, 71.4% of patients treated with rufinamide and 60.0% of patients treated with placebo experienced AEs; most commonly, somnolence (33.3% vs. 20.0%) and vomiting (19.0% vs. 0%). Most AEs were of mild or moderate intensity. CONCLUSION: Rufinamide demonstrated favorable efficacy and was generally well tolerated when used as adjunctive treatment for adults with LGS. FUNDING: Eisai. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40120-016-0041-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2016-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4919131/ /pubmed/26861566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40120-016-0041-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
McMurray, Rob
Striano, Pasquale
Treatment of Adults with Lennox–Gastaut Syndrome: Further Analysis of Efficacy and Safety/Tolerability of Rufinamide
title Treatment of Adults with Lennox–Gastaut Syndrome: Further Analysis of Efficacy and Safety/Tolerability of Rufinamide
title_full Treatment of Adults with Lennox–Gastaut Syndrome: Further Analysis of Efficacy and Safety/Tolerability of Rufinamide
title_fullStr Treatment of Adults with Lennox–Gastaut Syndrome: Further Analysis of Efficacy and Safety/Tolerability of Rufinamide
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of Adults with Lennox–Gastaut Syndrome: Further Analysis of Efficacy and Safety/Tolerability of Rufinamide
title_short Treatment of Adults with Lennox–Gastaut Syndrome: Further Analysis of Efficacy and Safety/Tolerability of Rufinamide
title_sort treatment of adults with lennox–gastaut syndrome: further analysis of efficacy and safety/tolerability of rufinamide
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4919131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26861566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40120-016-0041-9
work_keys_str_mv AT mcmurrayrob treatmentofadultswithlennoxgastautsyndromefurtheranalysisofefficacyandsafetytolerabilityofrufinamide
AT strianopasquale treatmentofadultswithlennoxgastautsyndromefurtheranalysisofefficacyandsafetytolerabilityofrufinamide