Cargando…

The Effect of Latency Reversal Agents on Primary CD8 + T Cells: Implications for Shock and Kill Strategies for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Eradication

Shock and kill strategies involving the use of small molecules to induce viral transcription in resting CD4 + T cells (shock) followed by immune mediated clearance of the reactivated cells (kill), have been proposed as a method of eliminating latently infected CD4 + T cells. The combination of the h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walker-Sperling, Victoria E., Pohlmeyer, Christopher W., Tarwater, Patrick M., Blankson, Joel N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4919475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27428432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.04.019
_version_ 1782439252301185024
author Walker-Sperling, Victoria E.
Pohlmeyer, Christopher W.
Tarwater, Patrick M.
Blankson, Joel N.
author_facet Walker-Sperling, Victoria E.
Pohlmeyer, Christopher W.
Tarwater, Patrick M.
Blankson, Joel N.
author_sort Walker-Sperling, Victoria E.
collection PubMed
description Shock and kill strategies involving the use of small molecules to induce viral transcription in resting CD4 + T cells (shock) followed by immune mediated clearance of the reactivated cells (kill), have been proposed as a method of eliminating latently infected CD4 + T cells. The combination of the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor romidepsin and protein kinase C (PKC) agonist bryostatin-1 is very effective at reversing latency in vitro. However, we found that primary HIV-1 specific CD8 + T cells were not able to eliminate autologous resting CD4 + T cells that had been reactivated with these drugs. We tested the hypothesis that the drugs affected primary CD8 + T cell function and found that both agents had inhibitory effects on the suppressive capacity of HIV-specific CD8 + T cells from patients who control viral replication without antiretroviral therapy (elite suppressors/controllers). The inhibitory effect was additive and multi-factorial in nature. These inhibitory effects were not seen with prostratin, another PKC agonist, either alone or in combination with JQ1, a bromodomain-containing protein 4 inhibitor. Our results suggest that because of their adverse effects on primary CD8 + T cells, some LRAs may cause immune-suppression and therefore should be used with caution in shock and kill strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4919475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49194752016-06-30 The Effect of Latency Reversal Agents on Primary CD8 + T Cells: Implications for Shock and Kill Strategies for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Eradication Walker-Sperling, Victoria E. Pohlmeyer, Christopher W. Tarwater, Patrick M. Blankson, Joel N. EBioMedicine Research Paper Shock and kill strategies involving the use of small molecules to induce viral transcription in resting CD4 + T cells (shock) followed by immune mediated clearance of the reactivated cells (kill), have been proposed as a method of eliminating latently infected CD4 + T cells. The combination of the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor romidepsin and protein kinase C (PKC) agonist bryostatin-1 is very effective at reversing latency in vitro. However, we found that primary HIV-1 specific CD8 + T cells were not able to eliminate autologous resting CD4 + T cells that had been reactivated with these drugs. We tested the hypothesis that the drugs affected primary CD8 + T cell function and found that both agents had inhibitory effects on the suppressive capacity of HIV-specific CD8 + T cells from patients who control viral replication without antiretroviral therapy (elite suppressors/controllers). The inhibitory effect was additive and multi-factorial in nature. These inhibitory effects were not seen with prostratin, another PKC agonist, either alone or in combination with JQ1, a bromodomain-containing protein 4 inhibitor. Our results suggest that because of their adverse effects on primary CD8 + T cells, some LRAs may cause immune-suppression and therefore should be used with caution in shock and kill strategies. Elsevier 2016-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4919475/ /pubmed/27428432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.04.019 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Walker-Sperling, Victoria E.
Pohlmeyer, Christopher W.
Tarwater, Patrick M.
Blankson, Joel N.
The Effect of Latency Reversal Agents on Primary CD8 + T Cells: Implications for Shock and Kill Strategies for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Eradication
title The Effect of Latency Reversal Agents on Primary CD8 + T Cells: Implications for Shock and Kill Strategies for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Eradication
title_full The Effect of Latency Reversal Agents on Primary CD8 + T Cells: Implications for Shock and Kill Strategies for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Eradication
title_fullStr The Effect of Latency Reversal Agents on Primary CD8 + T Cells: Implications for Shock and Kill Strategies for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Eradication
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Latency Reversal Agents on Primary CD8 + T Cells: Implications for Shock and Kill Strategies for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Eradication
title_short The Effect of Latency Reversal Agents on Primary CD8 + T Cells: Implications for Shock and Kill Strategies for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Eradication
title_sort effect of latency reversal agents on primary cd8 + t cells: implications for shock and kill strategies for human immunodeficiency virus eradication
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4919475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27428432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.04.019
work_keys_str_mv AT walkersperlingvictoriae theeffectoflatencyreversalagentsonprimarycd8tcellsimplicationsforshockandkillstrategiesforhumanimmunodeficiencyviruseradication
AT pohlmeyerchristopherw theeffectoflatencyreversalagentsonprimarycd8tcellsimplicationsforshockandkillstrategiesforhumanimmunodeficiencyviruseradication
AT tarwaterpatrickm theeffectoflatencyreversalagentsonprimarycd8tcellsimplicationsforshockandkillstrategiesforhumanimmunodeficiencyviruseradication
AT blanksonjoeln theeffectoflatencyreversalagentsonprimarycd8tcellsimplicationsforshockandkillstrategiesforhumanimmunodeficiencyviruseradication
AT walkersperlingvictoriae effectoflatencyreversalagentsonprimarycd8tcellsimplicationsforshockandkillstrategiesforhumanimmunodeficiencyviruseradication
AT pohlmeyerchristopherw effectoflatencyreversalagentsonprimarycd8tcellsimplicationsforshockandkillstrategiesforhumanimmunodeficiencyviruseradication
AT tarwaterpatrickm effectoflatencyreversalagentsonprimarycd8tcellsimplicationsforshockandkillstrategiesforhumanimmunodeficiencyviruseradication
AT blanksonjoeln effectoflatencyreversalagentsonprimarycd8tcellsimplicationsforshockandkillstrategiesforhumanimmunodeficiencyviruseradication