Cargando…
The Effect of Latency Reversal Agents on Primary CD8 + T Cells: Implications for Shock and Kill Strategies for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Eradication
Shock and kill strategies involving the use of small molecules to induce viral transcription in resting CD4 + T cells (shock) followed by immune mediated clearance of the reactivated cells (kill), have been proposed as a method of eliminating latently infected CD4 + T cells. The combination of the h...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4919475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27428432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.04.019 |
_version_ | 1782439252301185024 |
---|---|
author | Walker-Sperling, Victoria E. Pohlmeyer, Christopher W. Tarwater, Patrick M. Blankson, Joel N. |
author_facet | Walker-Sperling, Victoria E. Pohlmeyer, Christopher W. Tarwater, Patrick M. Blankson, Joel N. |
author_sort | Walker-Sperling, Victoria E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Shock and kill strategies involving the use of small molecules to induce viral transcription in resting CD4 + T cells (shock) followed by immune mediated clearance of the reactivated cells (kill), have been proposed as a method of eliminating latently infected CD4 + T cells. The combination of the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor romidepsin and protein kinase C (PKC) agonist bryostatin-1 is very effective at reversing latency in vitro. However, we found that primary HIV-1 specific CD8 + T cells were not able to eliminate autologous resting CD4 + T cells that had been reactivated with these drugs. We tested the hypothesis that the drugs affected primary CD8 + T cell function and found that both agents had inhibitory effects on the suppressive capacity of HIV-specific CD8 + T cells from patients who control viral replication without antiretroviral therapy (elite suppressors/controllers). The inhibitory effect was additive and multi-factorial in nature. These inhibitory effects were not seen with prostratin, another PKC agonist, either alone or in combination with JQ1, a bromodomain-containing protein 4 inhibitor. Our results suggest that because of their adverse effects on primary CD8 + T cells, some LRAs may cause immune-suppression and therefore should be used with caution in shock and kill strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4919475 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49194752016-06-30 The Effect of Latency Reversal Agents on Primary CD8 + T Cells: Implications for Shock and Kill Strategies for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Eradication Walker-Sperling, Victoria E. Pohlmeyer, Christopher W. Tarwater, Patrick M. Blankson, Joel N. EBioMedicine Research Paper Shock and kill strategies involving the use of small molecules to induce viral transcription in resting CD4 + T cells (shock) followed by immune mediated clearance of the reactivated cells (kill), have been proposed as a method of eliminating latently infected CD4 + T cells. The combination of the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor romidepsin and protein kinase C (PKC) agonist bryostatin-1 is very effective at reversing latency in vitro. However, we found that primary HIV-1 specific CD8 + T cells were not able to eliminate autologous resting CD4 + T cells that had been reactivated with these drugs. We tested the hypothesis that the drugs affected primary CD8 + T cell function and found that both agents had inhibitory effects on the suppressive capacity of HIV-specific CD8 + T cells from patients who control viral replication without antiretroviral therapy (elite suppressors/controllers). The inhibitory effect was additive and multi-factorial in nature. These inhibitory effects were not seen with prostratin, another PKC agonist, either alone or in combination with JQ1, a bromodomain-containing protein 4 inhibitor. Our results suggest that because of their adverse effects on primary CD8 + T cells, some LRAs may cause immune-suppression and therefore should be used with caution in shock and kill strategies. Elsevier 2016-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4919475/ /pubmed/27428432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.04.019 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Walker-Sperling, Victoria E. Pohlmeyer, Christopher W. Tarwater, Patrick M. Blankson, Joel N. The Effect of Latency Reversal Agents on Primary CD8 + T Cells: Implications for Shock and Kill Strategies for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Eradication |
title | The Effect of Latency Reversal Agents on Primary CD8 + T Cells: Implications for Shock and Kill Strategies for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Eradication |
title_full | The Effect of Latency Reversal Agents on Primary CD8 + T Cells: Implications for Shock and Kill Strategies for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Eradication |
title_fullStr | The Effect of Latency Reversal Agents on Primary CD8 + T Cells: Implications for Shock and Kill Strategies for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Eradication |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Latency Reversal Agents on Primary CD8 + T Cells: Implications for Shock and Kill Strategies for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Eradication |
title_short | The Effect of Latency Reversal Agents on Primary CD8 + T Cells: Implications for Shock and Kill Strategies for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Eradication |
title_sort | effect of latency reversal agents on primary cd8 + t cells: implications for shock and kill strategies for human immunodeficiency virus eradication |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4919475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27428432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.04.019 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walkersperlingvictoriae theeffectoflatencyreversalagentsonprimarycd8tcellsimplicationsforshockandkillstrategiesforhumanimmunodeficiencyviruseradication AT pohlmeyerchristopherw theeffectoflatencyreversalagentsonprimarycd8tcellsimplicationsforshockandkillstrategiesforhumanimmunodeficiencyviruseradication AT tarwaterpatrickm theeffectoflatencyreversalagentsonprimarycd8tcellsimplicationsforshockandkillstrategiesforhumanimmunodeficiencyviruseradication AT blanksonjoeln theeffectoflatencyreversalagentsonprimarycd8tcellsimplicationsforshockandkillstrategiesforhumanimmunodeficiencyviruseradication AT walkersperlingvictoriae effectoflatencyreversalagentsonprimarycd8tcellsimplicationsforshockandkillstrategiesforhumanimmunodeficiencyviruseradication AT pohlmeyerchristopherw effectoflatencyreversalagentsonprimarycd8tcellsimplicationsforshockandkillstrategiesforhumanimmunodeficiencyviruseradication AT tarwaterpatrickm effectoflatencyreversalagentsonprimarycd8tcellsimplicationsforshockandkillstrategiesforhumanimmunodeficiencyviruseradication AT blanksonjoeln effectoflatencyreversalagentsonprimarycd8tcellsimplicationsforshockandkillstrategiesforhumanimmunodeficiencyviruseradication |