Cargando…

Comparative study of the radiopacity of resin cements used in aesthetic dentistry

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the radiopacity of 6 modern resin cements with that of human enamel and dentine using the Digora digital radiography system, to verify whether they meet the requirements of ANSI/ADA specification no. 27/1993 and the ISO 4049/2000 standard and assess whet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Montes-Fariza, Raquel, Monterde-Hernández, Manuel, Cabanillas-Casabella, Cristina, Pallares-Sabater, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4919490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27350854
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.3.201
_version_ 1782439255867392000
author Montes-Fariza, Raquel
Monterde-Hernández, Manuel
Cabanillas-Casabella, Cristina
Pallares-Sabater, Antonio
author_facet Montes-Fariza, Raquel
Monterde-Hernández, Manuel
Cabanillas-Casabella, Cristina
Pallares-Sabater, Antonio
author_sort Montes-Fariza, Raquel
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the radiopacity of 6 modern resin cements with that of human enamel and dentine using the Digora digital radiography system, to verify whether they meet the requirements of ANSI/ADA specification no. 27/1993 and the ISO 4049/2000 standard and assess whether their radiopacity is influenced by the thickness of the cement employed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three 3-thickness samples (0.5, 1 and 1.5 mm) were fabricated for each material. The individual cement samples were radiographed on the CCD sensor next to the aluminium wedge and the tooth samples. Five radiographs were made of each sample and therefore five readings of radiographic density were taken for each thickness of the materials. The radiopacity was measured in pixels using Digora 2.6 software. The calibration curve obtained from the mean values of each step of the wedge made it possible to obtain the equivalent in mm of aluminium for each mm of the luting material. RESULTS: With the exception of Variolink Veneer Medium Value 0, all the cements studied were more radiopaque than enamel and dentin (P<.05) and complied with the ISO and ANSI/ADA requirements (P<.001). The radiopacity of all the cements examined depended on their thickness: the thicker the material, the greater its radiopacity. CONCLUSION: All materials except Variolink Veneer Medium Value 0 yielded radiopacity values that complied with the recommendations of the ISO and ANSI/ADA. Variolink Veneer Medium Value 0 showed less radiopacity than enamel and dentin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4919490
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49194902016-06-27 Comparative study of the radiopacity of resin cements used in aesthetic dentistry Montes-Fariza, Raquel Monterde-Hernández, Manuel Cabanillas-Casabella, Cristina Pallares-Sabater, Antonio J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the radiopacity of 6 modern resin cements with that of human enamel and dentine using the Digora digital radiography system, to verify whether they meet the requirements of ANSI/ADA specification no. 27/1993 and the ISO 4049/2000 standard and assess whether their radiopacity is influenced by the thickness of the cement employed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three 3-thickness samples (0.5, 1 and 1.5 mm) were fabricated for each material. The individual cement samples were radiographed on the CCD sensor next to the aluminium wedge and the tooth samples. Five radiographs were made of each sample and therefore five readings of radiographic density were taken for each thickness of the materials. The radiopacity was measured in pixels using Digora 2.6 software. The calibration curve obtained from the mean values of each step of the wedge made it possible to obtain the equivalent in mm of aluminium for each mm of the luting material. RESULTS: With the exception of Variolink Veneer Medium Value 0, all the cements studied were more radiopaque than enamel and dentin (P<.05) and complied with the ISO and ANSI/ADA requirements (P<.001). The radiopacity of all the cements examined depended on their thickness: the thicker the material, the greater its radiopacity. CONCLUSION: All materials except Variolink Veneer Medium Value 0 yielded radiopacity values that complied with the recommendations of the ISO and ANSI/ADA. Variolink Veneer Medium Value 0 showed less radiopacity than enamel and dentin. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2016-06 2016-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4919490/ /pubmed/27350854 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.3.201 Text en © 2016 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Montes-Fariza, Raquel
Monterde-Hernández, Manuel
Cabanillas-Casabella, Cristina
Pallares-Sabater, Antonio
Comparative study of the radiopacity of resin cements used in aesthetic dentistry
title Comparative study of the radiopacity of resin cements used in aesthetic dentistry
title_full Comparative study of the radiopacity of resin cements used in aesthetic dentistry
title_fullStr Comparative study of the radiopacity of resin cements used in aesthetic dentistry
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of the radiopacity of resin cements used in aesthetic dentistry
title_short Comparative study of the radiopacity of resin cements used in aesthetic dentistry
title_sort comparative study of the radiopacity of resin cements used in aesthetic dentistry
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4919490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27350854
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.3.201
work_keys_str_mv AT montesfarizaraquel comparativestudyoftheradiopacityofresincementsusedinaestheticdentistry
AT monterdehernandezmanuel comparativestudyoftheradiopacityofresincementsusedinaestheticdentistry
AT cabanillascasabellacristina comparativestudyoftheradiopacityofresincementsusedinaestheticdentistry
AT pallaressabaterantonio comparativestudyoftheradiopacityofresincementsusedinaestheticdentistry