Cargando…
Function-specific virtual screening for GPCR ligands using a combined scoring method
The ability of scoring functions to correctly select and rank docking poses of small molecules in protein binding sites is highly target dependent, which presents a challenge for structure-based drug discovery. Here we describe a virtual screening method that combines an energy-based docking scoring...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4919634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27339552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep28288 |
_version_ | 1782439280907386880 |
---|---|
author | Kooistra, Albert J. Vischer, Henry F. McNaught-Flores, Daniel Leurs, Rob de Esch, Iwan J. P. de Graaf, Chris |
author_facet | Kooistra, Albert J. Vischer, Henry F. McNaught-Flores, Daniel Leurs, Rob de Esch, Iwan J. P. de Graaf, Chris |
author_sort | Kooistra, Albert J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The ability of scoring functions to correctly select and rank docking poses of small molecules in protein binding sites is highly target dependent, which presents a challenge for structure-based drug discovery. Here we describe a virtual screening method that combines an energy-based docking scoring function with a molecular interaction fingerprint (IFP) to identify new ligands based on G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) crystal structures. The consensus scoring method is prospectively evaluated by: 1) the discovery of chemically novel, fragment-like, high affinity histamine H(1) receptor (H(1)R) antagonists/inverse agonists, 2) the selective structure-based identification of ß(2)-adrenoceptor (ß(2)R) agonists, and 3) the experimental validation and comparison of the combined and individual scoring approaches. Systematic retrospective virtual screening simulations allowed the definition of scoring cut-offs for the identification of H(1)R and ß(2)R ligands and the selection of an optimal ß-adrenoceptor crystal structure for the discrimination between ß(2)R agonists and antagonists. The consensus approach resulted in the experimental validation of 53% of the ß(2)R and 73% of the H(1)R virtual screening hits with up to nanomolar affinities and potencies. The selective identification of ß(2)R agonists shows the possibilities of structure-based prediction of GPCR ligand function by integrating protein-ligand binding mode information. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4919634 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49196342016-06-28 Function-specific virtual screening for GPCR ligands using a combined scoring method Kooistra, Albert J. Vischer, Henry F. McNaught-Flores, Daniel Leurs, Rob de Esch, Iwan J. P. de Graaf, Chris Sci Rep Article The ability of scoring functions to correctly select and rank docking poses of small molecules in protein binding sites is highly target dependent, which presents a challenge for structure-based drug discovery. Here we describe a virtual screening method that combines an energy-based docking scoring function with a molecular interaction fingerprint (IFP) to identify new ligands based on G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) crystal structures. The consensus scoring method is prospectively evaluated by: 1) the discovery of chemically novel, fragment-like, high affinity histamine H(1) receptor (H(1)R) antagonists/inverse agonists, 2) the selective structure-based identification of ß(2)-adrenoceptor (ß(2)R) agonists, and 3) the experimental validation and comparison of the combined and individual scoring approaches. Systematic retrospective virtual screening simulations allowed the definition of scoring cut-offs for the identification of H(1)R and ß(2)R ligands and the selection of an optimal ß-adrenoceptor crystal structure for the discrimination between ß(2)R agonists and antagonists. The consensus approach resulted in the experimental validation of 53% of the ß(2)R and 73% of the H(1)R virtual screening hits with up to nanomolar affinities and potencies. The selective identification of ß(2)R agonists shows the possibilities of structure-based prediction of GPCR ligand function by integrating protein-ligand binding mode information. Nature Publishing Group 2016-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4919634/ /pubmed/27339552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep28288 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Kooistra, Albert J. Vischer, Henry F. McNaught-Flores, Daniel Leurs, Rob de Esch, Iwan J. P. de Graaf, Chris Function-specific virtual screening for GPCR ligands using a combined scoring method |
title | Function-specific virtual screening for GPCR ligands using a combined scoring method |
title_full | Function-specific virtual screening for GPCR ligands using a combined scoring method |
title_fullStr | Function-specific virtual screening for GPCR ligands using a combined scoring method |
title_full_unstemmed | Function-specific virtual screening for GPCR ligands using a combined scoring method |
title_short | Function-specific virtual screening for GPCR ligands using a combined scoring method |
title_sort | function-specific virtual screening for gpcr ligands using a combined scoring method |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4919634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27339552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep28288 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kooistraalbertj functionspecificvirtualscreeningforgpcrligandsusingacombinedscoringmethod AT vischerhenryf functionspecificvirtualscreeningforgpcrligandsusingacombinedscoringmethod AT mcnaughtfloresdaniel functionspecificvirtualscreeningforgpcrligandsusingacombinedscoringmethod AT leursrob functionspecificvirtualscreeningforgpcrligandsusingacombinedscoringmethod AT deeschiwanjp functionspecificvirtualscreeningforgpcrligandsusingacombinedscoringmethod AT degraafchris functionspecificvirtualscreeningforgpcrligandsusingacombinedscoringmethod |