Cargando…

Function-specific virtual screening for GPCR ligands using a combined scoring method

The ability of scoring functions to correctly select and rank docking poses of small molecules in protein binding sites is highly target dependent, which presents a challenge for structure-based drug discovery. Here we describe a virtual screening method that combines an energy-based docking scoring...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kooistra, Albert J., Vischer, Henry F., McNaught-Flores, Daniel, Leurs, Rob, de Esch, Iwan J. P., de Graaf, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4919634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27339552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep28288
_version_ 1782439280907386880
author Kooistra, Albert J.
Vischer, Henry F.
McNaught-Flores, Daniel
Leurs, Rob
de Esch, Iwan J. P.
de Graaf, Chris
author_facet Kooistra, Albert J.
Vischer, Henry F.
McNaught-Flores, Daniel
Leurs, Rob
de Esch, Iwan J. P.
de Graaf, Chris
author_sort Kooistra, Albert J.
collection PubMed
description The ability of scoring functions to correctly select and rank docking poses of small molecules in protein binding sites is highly target dependent, which presents a challenge for structure-based drug discovery. Here we describe a virtual screening method that combines an energy-based docking scoring function with a molecular interaction fingerprint (IFP) to identify new ligands based on G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) crystal structures. The consensus scoring method is prospectively evaluated by: 1) the discovery of chemically novel, fragment-like, high affinity histamine H(1) receptor (H(1)R) antagonists/inverse agonists, 2) the selective structure-based identification of ß(2)-adrenoceptor (ß(2)R) agonists, and 3) the experimental validation and comparison of the combined and individual scoring approaches. Systematic retrospective virtual screening simulations allowed the definition of scoring cut-offs for the identification of H(1)R and ß(2)R ligands and the selection of an optimal ß-adrenoceptor crystal structure for the discrimination between ß(2)R agonists and antagonists. The consensus approach resulted in the experimental validation of 53% of the ß(2)R and 73% of the H(1)R virtual screening hits with up to nanomolar affinities and potencies. The selective identification of ß(2)R agonists shows the possibilities of structure-based prediction of GPCR ligand function by integrating protein-ligand binding mode information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4919634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49196342016-06-28 Function-specific virtual screening for GPCR ligands using a combined scoring method Kooistra, Albert J. Vischer, Henry F. McNaught-Flores, Daniel Leurs, Rob de Esch, Iwan J. P. de Graaf, Chris Sci Rep Article The ability of scoring functions to correctly select and rank docking poses of small molecules in protein binding sites is highly target dependent, which presents a challenge for structure-based drug discovery. Here we describe a virtual screening method that combines an energy-based docking scoring function with a molecular interaction fingerprint (IFP) to identify new ligands based on G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) crystal structures. The consensus scoring method is prospectively evaluated by: 1) the discovery of chemically novel, fragment-like, high affinity histamine H(1) receptor (H(1)R) antagonists/inverse agonists, 2) the selective structure-based identification of ß(2)-adrenoceptor (ß(2)R) agonists, and 3) the experimental validation and comparison of the combined and individual scoring approaches. Systematic retrospective virtual screening simulations allowed the definition of scoring cut-offs for the identification of H(1)R and ß(2)R ligands and the selection of an optimal ß-adrenoceptor crystal structure for the discrimination between ß(2)R agonists and antagonists. The consensus approach resulted in the experimental validation of 53% of the ß(2)R and 73% of the H(1)R virtual screening hits with up to nanomolar affinities and potencies. The selective identification of ß(2)R agonists shows the possibilities of structure-based prediction of GPCR ligand function by integrating protein-ligand binding mode information. Nature Publishing Group 2016-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4919634/ /pubmed/27339552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep28288 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Kooistra, Albert J.
Vischer, Henry F.
McNaught-Flores, Daniel
Leurs, Rob
de Esch, Iwan J. P.
de Graaf, Chris
Function-specific virtual screening for GPCR ligands using a combined scoring method
title Function-specific virtual screening for GPCR ligands using a combined scoring method
title_full Function-specific virtual screening for GPCR ligands using a combined scoring method
title_fullStr Function-specific virtual screening for GPCR ligands using a combined scoring method
title_full_unstemmed Function-specific virtual screening for GPCR ligands using a combined scoring method
title_short Function-specific virtual screening for GPCR ligands using a combined scoring method
title_sort function-specific virtual screening for gpcr ligands using a combined scoring method
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4919634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27339552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep28288
work_keys_str_mv AT kooistraalbertj functionspecificvirtualscreeningforgpcrligandsusingacombinedscoringmethod
AT vischerhenryf functionspecificvirtualscreeningforgpcrligandsusingacombinedscoringmethod
AT mcnaughtfloresdaniel functionspecificvirtualscreeningforgpcrligandsusingacombinedscoringmethod
AT leursrob functionspecificvirtualscreeningforgpcrligandsusingacombinedscoringmethod
AT deeschiwanjp functionspecificvirtualscreeningforgpcrligandsusingacombinedscoringmethod
AT degraafchris functionspecificvirtualscreeningforgpcrligandsusingacombinedscoringmethod