Cargando…
Comparison of Thermal and Non-Thermal Processing of Swine Feed and the Use of Selected Feed Additives on Inactivation of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (PEDV)
Infection with porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) causes diarrhea, vomiting, and high mortality in suckling pigs. Contaminated feed has been suggested as a vehicle of transmission for PEDV. The objective of this study was to compare thermal and electron beam processing, and the inclusion of feed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4920390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27341670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158128 |
_version_ | 1782439385025740800 |
---|---|
author | Trudeau, Michaela P. Verma, Harsha Sampedro, Fernando Urriola, Pedro E. Shurson, Gerald C. McKelvey, Jessica Pillai, Suresh D. Goyal, Sagar M. |
author_facet | Trudeau, Michaela P. Verma, Harsha Sampedro, Fernando Urriola, Pedro E. Shurson, Gerald C. McKelvey, Jessica Pillai, Suresh D. Goyal, Sagar M. |
author_sort | Trudeau, Michaela P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Infection with porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) causes diarrhea, vomiting, and high mortality in suckling pigs. Contaminated feed has been suggested as a vehicle of transmission for PEDV. The objective of this study was to compare thermal and electron beam processing, and the inclusion of feed additives on the inactivation of PEDV in feed. Feed samples were spiked with PEDV and then heated to 120–145°C for up to 30 min or irradiated at 0–50 kGy. Another set of feed samples spiked with PEDV and mixed with Ultracid P (Nutriad), Activate DA (Novus International), KEM-GEST (Kemin Agrifood), Acid Booster (Agri-Nutrition), sugar or salt was incubated at room temperature (~25°C) for up to 21 days. At the end of incubation, the virus titers were determined by inoculation of Vero-81 cells and the virus inactivation kinetics were modeled using the Weibull distribution model. The Weibull kinetic parameter delta represented the time or eBeam dose required to reduce virus concentration by 1 log. For thermal processing, delta values ranged from 16.52 min at 120°C to 1.30 min at 145°C. For eBeam processing, a target dose of 50 kGy reduced PEDV concentration by 3 log. All additives tested were effective in reducing the survival of PEDV when compared with the control sample (delta = 17.23 days). Activate DA (0.81) and KEM-GEST (3.28) produced the fastest inactivation. In conclusion, heating swine feed at temperatures over 130°C or eBeam processing of feed with a dose over 50 kGy are effective processing steps to reduce PEDV survival. Additionally, the inclusion of selected additives can decrease PEDV survivability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4920390 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49203902016-07-18 Comparison of Thermal and Non-Thermal Processing of Swine Feed and the Use of Selected Feed Additives on Inactivation of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (PEDV) Trudeau, Michaela P. Verma, Harsha Sampedro, Fernando Urriola, Pedro E. Shurson, Gerald C. McKelvey, Jessica Pillai, Suresh D. Goyal, Sagar M. PLoS One Research Article Infection with porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) causes diarrhea, vomiting, and high mortality in suckling pigs. Contaminated feed has been suggested as a vehicle of transmission for PEDV. The objective of this study was to compare thermal and electron beam processing, and the inclusion of feed additives on the inactivation of PEDV in feed. Feed samples were spiked with PEDV and then heated to 120–145°C for up to 30 min or irradiated at 0–50 kGy. Another set of feed samples spiked with PEDV and mixed with Ultracid P (Nutriad), Activate DA (Novus International), KEM-GEST (Kemin Agrifood), Acid Booster (Agri-Nutrition), sugar or salt was incubated at room temperature (~25°C) for up to 21 days. At the end of incubation, the virus titers were determined by inoculation of Vero-81 cells and the virus inactivation kinetics were modeled using the Weibull distribution model. The Weibull kinetic parameter delta represented the time or eBeam dose required to reduce virus concentration by 1 log. For thermal processing, delta values ranged from 16.52 min at 120°C to 1.30 min at 145°C. For eBeam processing, a target dose of 50 kGy reduced PEDV concentration by 3 log. All additives tested were effective in reducing the survival of PEDV when compared with the control sample (delta = 17.23 days). Activate DA (0.81) and KEM-GEST (3.28) produced the fastest inactivation. In conclusion, heating swine feed at temperatures over 130°C or eBeam processing of feed with a dose over 50 kGy are effective processing steps to reduce PEDV survival. Additionally, the inclusion of selected additives can decrease PEDV survivability. Public Library of Science 2016-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4920390/ /pubmed/27341670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158128 Text en © 2016 Trudeau et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Trudeau, Michaela P. Verma, Harsha Sampedro, Fernando Urriola, Pedro E. Shurson, Gerald C. McKelvey, Jessica Pillai, Suresh D. Goyal, Sagar M. Comparison of Thermal and Non-Thermal Processing of Swine Feed and the Use of Selected Feed Additives on Inactivation of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (PEDV) |
title | Comparison of Thermal and Non-Thermal Processing of Swine Feed and the Use of Selected Feed Additives on Inactivation of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (PEDV) |
title_full | Comparison of Thermal and Non-Thermal Processing of Swine Feed and the Use of Selected Feed Additives on Inactivation of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (PEDV) |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Thermal and Non-Thermal Processing of Swine Feed and the Use of Selected Feed Additives on Inactivation of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (PEDV) |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Thermal and Non-Thermal Processing of Swine Feed and the Use of Selected Feed Additives on Inactivation of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (PEDV) |
title_short | Comparison of Thermal and Non-Thermal Processing of Swine Feed and the Use of Selected Feed Additives on Inactivation of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (PEDV) |
title_sort | comparison of thermal and non-thermal processing of swine feed and the use of selected feed additives on inactivation of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (pedv) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4920390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27341670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158128 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT trudeaumichaelap comparisonofthermalandnonthermalprocessingofswinefeedandtheuseofselectedfeedadditivesoninactivationofporcineepidemicdiarrheaviruspedv AT vermaharsha comparisonofthermalandnonthermalprocessingofswinefeedandtheuseofselectedfeedadditivesoninactivationofporcineepidemicdiarrheaviruspedv AT sampedrofernando comparisonofthermalandnonthermalprocessingofswinefeedandtheuseofselectedfeedadditivesoninactivationofporcineepidemicdiarrheaviruspedv AT urriolapedroe comparisonofthermalandnonthermalprocessingofswinefeedandtheuseofselectedfeedadditivesoninactivationofporcineepidemicdiarrheaviruspedv AT shursongeraldc comparisonofthermalandnonthermalprocessingofswinefeedandtheuseofselectedfeedadditivesoninactivationofporcineepidemicdiarrheaviruspedv AT mckelveyjessica comparisonofthermalandnonthermalprocessingofswinefeedandtheuseofselectedfeedadditivesoninactivationofporcineepidemicdiarrheaviruspedv AT pillaisureshd comparisonofthermalandnonthermalprocessingofswinefeedandtheuseofselectedfeedadditivesoninactivationofporcineepidemicdiarrheaviruspedv AT goyalsagarm comparisonofthermalandnonthermalprocessingofswinefeedandtheuseofselectedfeedadditivesoninactivationofporcineepidemicdiarrheaviruspedv |