Cargando…

The “Pelvic Harness”: a skeletonized mesh implant for safe pelvic floor reconstruction

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility, safety and surgical results of skeletonized mesh implants to form a pelvic harness for pelvic floor reconstruction surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with advanced pelvic floor prolapse were enrolled to this study. Study model was a kit mesh, reduced to 75% of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Natalia, Sumerova, Menahem, Neuman, Haim, Krissi, Dmitri, Pushkar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4920568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27286114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0177
_version_ 1782439419075100672
author Natalia, Sumerova
Menahem, Neuman
Haim, Krissi
Dmitri, Pushkar
author_facet Natalia, Sumerova
Menahem, Neuman
Haim, Krissi
Dmitri, Pushkar
author_sort Natalia, Sumerova
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility, safety and surgical results of skeletonized mesh implants to form a pelvic harness for pelvic floor reconstruction surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with advanced pelvic floor prolapse were enrolled to this study. Study model was a kit mesh, reduced to 75% of the original surface area by cutting out mesh material from the central mesh body. Patients were evaluated at the end of the 1(st) and 6(th) post-operative months and interviewed at the study conclusion. RESULTS: Ninety-five women with advanced pelvic floor prolapse had this implant. Mean follow-up duration was 9 months (6-12 months). The POP-Q point’s measurements showed marked and statistically significant improvements. Bladder over-activity symptoms, fecal incontinence, pelvic pain and constipation rates were all reduced as well. No adverse effects related to the dissection or mesh implantation were marked. The first and sixth post-operative month follow-up records as well as the study conclusion interview findings were satisfactory in terms of subjective and objective cure and adverse effects occurrence. CONCLUSION: This study data proposes that skeletonizing meshes might be safely and successfully implanted for potentially improved pelvic floor reconstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4920568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49205682016-06-27 The “Pelvic Harness”: a skeletonized mesh implant for safe pelvic floor reconstruction Natalia, Sumerova Menahem, Neuman Haim, Krissi Dmitri, Pushkar Int Braz J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility, safety and surgical results of skeletonized mesh implants to form a pelvic harness for pelvic floor reconstruction surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with advanced pelvic floor prolapse were enrolled to this study. Study model was a kit mesh, reduced to 75% of the original surface area by cutting out mesh material from the central mesh body. Patients were evaluated at the end of the 1(st) and 6(th) post-operative months and interviewed at the study conclusion. RESULTS: Ninety-five women with advanced pelvic floor prolapse had this implant. Mean follow-up duration was 9 months (6-12 months). The POP-Q point’s measurements showed marked and statistically significant improvements. Bladder over-activity symptoms, fecal incontinence, pelvic pain and constipation rates were all reduced as well. No adverse effects related to the dissection or mesh implantation were marked. The first and sixth post-operative month follow-up records as well as the study conclusion interview findings were satisfactory in terms of subjective and objective cure and adverse effects occurrence. CONCLUSION: This study data proposes that skeletonizing meshes might be safely and successfully implanted for potentially improved pelvic floor reconstruction. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4920568/ /pubmed/27286114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0177 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Natalia, Sumerova
Menahem, Neuman
Haim, Krissi
Dmitri, Pushkar
The “Pelvic Harness”: a skeletonized mesh implant for safe pelvic floor reconstruction
title The “Pelvic Harness”: a skeletonized mesh implant for safe pelvic floor reconstruction
title_full The “Pelvic Harness”: a skeletonized mesh implant for safe pelvic floor reconstruction
title_fullStr The “Pelvic Harness”: a skeletonized mesh implant for safe pelvic floor reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed The “Pelvic Harness”: a skeletonized mesh implant for safe pelvic floor reconstruction
title_short The “Pelvic Harness”: a skeletonized mesh implant for safe pelvic floor reconstruction
title_sort “pelvic harness”: a skeletonized mesh implant for safe pelvic floor reconstruction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4920568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27286114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0177
work_keys_str_mv AT nataliasumerova thepelvicharnessaskeletonizedmeshimplantforsafepelvicfloorreconstruction
AT menahemneuman thepelvicharnessaskeletonizedmeshimplantforsafepelvicfloorreconstruction
AT haimkrissi thepelvicharnessaskeletonizedmeshimplantforsafepelvicfloorreconstruction
AT dmitripushkar thepelvicharnessaskeletonizedmeshimplantforsafepelvicfloorreconstruction
AT nataliasumerova pelvicharnessaskeletonizedmeshimplantforsafepelvicfloorreconstruction
AT menahemneuman pelvicharnessaskeletonizedmeshimplantforsafepelvicfloorreconstruction
AT haimkrissi pelvicharnessaskeletonizedmeshimplantforsafepelvicfloorreconstruction
AT dmitripushkar pelvicharnessaskeletonizedmeshimplantforsafepelvicfloorreconstruction