Cargando…

Are patients with lichen planus really prone to urolithiasis? Lichen planus and urolithiasis

PURPOSE: to investigate whether patients with lichen planus (LP) are really prone to urolithiasis or not. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective analysis of 40 patients diagnosed with lichen planus (LP) (group I), and 40 volunteers did not have LP before (group II). Participants were all c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oguz, Ural, Takci, Zennure, Oguz, Isil Deniz, Resorlu, Berkan, Balta, Ilknur, Unsal, Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4920577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27286123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0364
_version_ 1782439421129261056
author Oguz, Ural
Takci, Zennure
Oguz, Isil Deniz
Resorlu, Berkan
Balta, Ilknur
Unsal, Ali
author_facet Oguz, Ural
Takci, Zennure
Oguz, Isil Deniz
Resorlu, Berkan
Balta, Ilknur
Unsal, Ali
author_sort Oguz, Ural
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: to investigate whether patients with lichen planus (LP) are really prone to urolithiasis or not. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective analysis of 40 patients diagnosed with lichen planus (LP) (group I), and 40 volunteers did not have LP before (group II). Participants were all checked for urolithiasis by radiological investigations. Blood samples were analyzed for biochemistry parameters including calcium and uric acid. 24-h urine samples were analyzed to investigate oxalate, citrate calcium, uric acid, magnesium, sodium and creatinine. RESULTS: Men/women ratio and mean age were similar between group I and II (p>0.05). A presence or history of urolithiasis was detected in 8 (20%) and 2 (%5) patients in group I and II, respectively (p<0.05). Hypocitraturia was the most common anomaly with 35% (n:14) in group I. The rate of hypocitraturia in group II was 12.5% (n:5) and the difference was statistically significantly different (p=0.036). In group I, hyperuricosuria and hyperoxaluria followed with rates of 27.5% (n:11) and 25% (n:10), respectively. The rate of hyperuricosuria and hyperoxaluria were both 5% (n:2) in group II and the differences were significant (p<0.05). Hyperuricemia was another important finding in the patients with LP. It was detected in 13 (32.5%) patients in group I and in 1 (2.5%) participant in group II (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: According to our results, metabolic disorders of urolithiasis were highly detected in the patients with LP. However, similar to the etiology of LP, the exact reasons for these metabolic abnormalities in LP remain a mystery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4920577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49205772016-06-27 Are patients with lichen planus really prone to urolithiasis? Lichen planus and urolithiasis Oguz, Ural Takci, Zennure Oguz, Isil Deniz Resorlu, Berkan Balta, Ilknur Unsal, Ali Int Braz J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: to investigate whether patients with lichen planus (LP) are really prone to urolithiasis or not. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective analysis of 40 patients diagnosed with lichen planus (LP) (group I), and 40 volunteers did not have LP before (group II). Participants were all checked for urolithiasis by radiological investigations. Blood samples were analyzed for biochemistry parameters including calcium and uric acid. 24-h urine samples were analyzed to investigate oxalate, citrate calcium, uric acid, magnesium, sodium and creatinine. RESULTS: Men/women ratio and mean age were similar between group I and II (p>0.05). A presence or history of urolithiasis was detected in 8 (20%) and 2 (%5) patients in group I and II, respectively (p<0.05). Hypocitraturia was the most common anomaly with 35% (n:14) in group I. The rate of hypocitraturia in group II was 12.5% (n:5) and the difference was statistically significantly different (p=0.036). In group I, hyperuricosuria and hyperoxaluria followed with rates of 27.5% (n:11) and 25% (n:10), respectively. The rate of hyperuricosuria and hyperoxaluria were both 5% (n:2) in group II and the differences were significant (p<0.05). Hyperuricemia was another important finding in the patients with LP. It was detected in 13 (32.5%) patients in group I and in 1 (2.5%) participant in group II (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: According to our results, metabolic disorders of urolithiasis were highly detected in the patients with LP. However, similar to the etiology of LP, the exact reasons for these metabolic abnormalities in LP remain a mystery. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4920577/ /pubmed/27286123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0364 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Oguz, Ural
Takci, Zennure
Oguz, Isil Deniz
Resorlu, Berkan
Balta, Ilknur
Unsal, Ali
Are patients with lichen planus really prone to urolithiasis? Lichen planus and urolithiasis
title Are patients with lichen planus really prone to urolithiasis? Lichen planus and urolithiasis
title_full Are patients with lichen planus really prone to urolithiasis? Lichen planus and urolithiasis
title_fullStr Are patients with lichen planus really prone to urolithiasis? Lichen planus and urolithiasis
title_full_unstemmed Are patients with lichen planus really prone to urolithiasis? Lichen planus and urolithiasis
title_short Are patients with lichen planus really prone to urolithiasis? Lichen planus and urolithiasis
title_sort are patients with lichen planus really prone to urolithiasis? lichen planus and urolithiasis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4920577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27286123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0364
work_keys_str_mv AT oguzural arepatientswithlichenplanusreallypronetourolithiasislichenplanusandurolithiasis
AT takcizennure arepatientswithlichenplanusreallypronetourolithiasislichenplanusandurolithiasis
AT oguzisildeniz arepatientswithlichenplanusreallypronetourolithiasislichenplanusandurolithiasis
AT resorluberkan arepatientswithlichenplanusreallypronetourolithiasislichenplanusandurolithiasis
AT baltailknur arepatientswithlichenplanusreallypronetourolithiasislichenplanusandurolithiasis
AT unsalali arepatientswithlichenplanusreallypronetourolithiasislichenplanusandurolithiasis