Cargando…

Preanalytical conditions of point-of-care testing in the intensive care unit are decisive for analysis reliability

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care testing (POCT) systems enable a wide range of tests to be rapidly performed at the bedside and have attracted increasing interest in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, previous studies comparing the concordance of POCT with central laboratory testing have reported dive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Auvet, Adrien, Espitalier, Fabien, Grammatico-Guillon, Leslie, Nay, Mai-Anh, Elaroussi, Djilali, Laffon, Marc, Andres, Christian R., Legras, Annick, Ehrmann, Stephan, Dequin, Pierre-François, Gendrot, Chantal, Guillon, Antoine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Paris 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4920790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27342259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-016-0152-6
_version_ 1782439437247971328
author Auvet, Adrien
Espitalier, Fabien
Grammatico-Guillon, Leslie
Nay, Mai-Anh
Elaroussi, Djilali
Laffon, Marc
Andres, Christian R.
Legras, Annick
Ehrmann, Stephan
Dequin, Pierre-François
Gendrot, Chantal
Guillon, Antoine
author_facet Auvet, Adrien
Espitalier, Fabien
Grammatico-Guillon, Leslie
Nay, Mai-Anh
Elaroussi, Djilali
Laffon, Marc
Andres, Christian R.
Legras, Annick
Ehrmann, Stephan
Dequin, Pierre-François
Gendrot, Chantal
Guillon, Antoine
author_sort Auvet, Adrien
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Point-of-care testing (POCT) systems enable a wide range of tests to be rapidly performed at the bedside and have attracted increasing interest in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, previous studies comparing the concordance of POCT with central laboratory testing have reported divergent findings. Most reported studies on POCT reliability have focused on analyzer performance rather than the preanalytical phase. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of results provided by point-of-care analyzers according to the organization of the care units and the preanalytical process. METHODS: In three adult critical care units, 491 paired blood samples were analyzed for hemoglobin, potassium, and sodium concentrations by blood gas analyzers (identical reference) and the central laboratory. The clinical significance of agreement was assessed using Bland–Altman plots. A quality improvement program was then implemented to improve the preanalytical POCT process for one ICU where there was poor agreement. A second comparison was performed on 278 paired blood samples in this unit. RESULTS: Biases were clinically nonsignificant for potassium and sodium concentrations for all tested critical care units, relative to the reference method. However, biases [limits of agreements] for hemoglobin analyses were clearly affected by the preanalytical process: −3 [−6; 1] g/L in the operating room, −5 [−28; 17] g/L in a 10-bed ICU, and −19 [−64; 27] g/L in a 37-bed ICU. The quality approach was implemented in the 37-bed ICU and led to corrective actions that: (1) reduced the time for the POCT preanalytical phase; (2) implemented a checklist to validate the preanalytical conditions; (3) used technical innovations. The improvement of the preanalytical process resulted in a substantial decrease of the bias for hemoglobin concentration measurements: −3 [−10; 5] g/L in the 37-bed ICU. CONCLUSION: We clearly demonstrate that an identical analyzer can provide results of varying quality depending on the local constraints of the ICUs. We demonstrate that quality management focused on the preanalytical process and performed by the partners involved in the POCT can overcome these issues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4920790
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Paris
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49207902016-07-06 Preanalytical conditions of point-of-care testing in the intensive care unit are decisive for analysis reliability Auvet, Adrien Espitalier, Fabien Grammatico-Guillon, Leslie Nay, Mai-Anh Elaroussi, Djilali Laffon, Marc Andres, Christian R. Legras, Annick Ehrmann, Stephan Dequin, Pierre-François Gendrot, Chantal Guillon, Antoine Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Point-of-care testing (POCT) systems enable a wide range of tests to be rapidly performed at the bedside and have attracted increasing interest in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, previous studies comparing the concordance of POCT with central laboratory testing have reported divergent findings. Most reported studies on POCT reliability have focused on analyzer performance rather than the preanalytical phase. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of results provided by point-of-care analyzers according to the organization of the care units and the preanalytical process. METHODS: In three adult critical care units, 491 paired blood samples were analyzed for hemoglobin, potassium, and sodium concentrations by blood gas analyzers (identical reference) and the central laboratory. The clinical significance of agreement was assessed using Bland–Altman plots. A quality improvement program was then implemented to improve the preanalytical POCT process for one ICU where there was poor agreement. A second comparison was performed on 278 paired blood samples in this unit. RESULTS: Biases were clinically nonsignificant for potassium and sodium concentrations for all tested critical care units, relative to the reference method. However, biases [limits of agreements] for hemoglobin analyses were clearly affected by the preanalytical process: −3 [−6; 1] g/L in the operating room, −5 [−28; 17] g/L in a 10-bed ICU, and −19 [−64; 27] g/L in a 37-bed ICU. The quality approach was implemented in the 37-bed ICU and led to corrective actions that: (1) reduced the time for the POCT preanalytical phase; (2) implemented a checklist to validate the preanalytical conditions; (3) used technical innovations. The improvement of the preanalytical process resulted in a substantial decrease of the bias for hemoglobin concentration measurements: −3 [−10; 5] g/L in the 37-bed ICU. CONCLUSION: We clearly demonstrate that an identical analyzer can provide results of varying quality depending on the local constraints of the ICUs. We demonstrate that quality management focused on the preanalytical process and performed by the partners involved in the POCT can overcome these issues. Springer Paris 2016-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4920790/ /pubmed/27342259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-016-0152-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Auvet, Adrien
Espitalier, Fabien
Grammatico-Guillon, Leslie
Nay, Mai-Anh
Elaroussi, Djilali
Laffon, Marc
Andres, Christian R.
Legras, Annick
Ehrmann, Stephan
Dequin, Pierre-François
Gendrot, Chantal
Guillon, Antoine
Preanalytical conditions of point-of-care testing in the intensive care unit are decisive for analysis reliability
title Preanalytical conditions of point-of-care testing in the intensive care unit are decisive for analysis reliability
title_full Preanalytical conditions of point-of-care testing in the intensive care unit are decisive for analysis reliability
title_fullStr Preanalytical conditions of point-of-care testing in the intensive care unit are decisive for analysis reliability
title_full_unstemmed Preanalytical conditions of point-of-care testing in the intensive care unit are decisive for analysis reliability
title_short Preanalytical conditions of point-of-care testing in the intensive care unit are decisive for analysis reliability
title_sort preanalytical conditions of point-of-care testing in the intensive care unit are decisive for analysis reliability
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4920790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27342259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-016-0152-6
work_keys_str_mv AT auvetadrien preanalyticalconditionsofpointofcaretestingintheintensivecareunitaredecisiveforanalysisreliability
AT espitalierfabien preanalyticalconditionsofpointofcaretestingintheintensivecareunitaredecisiveforanalysisreliability
AT grammaticoguillonleslie preanalyticalconditionsofpointofcaretestingintheintensivecareunitaredecisiveforanalysisreliability
AT naymaianh preanalyticalconditionsofpointofcaretestingintheintensivecareunitaredecisiveforanalysisreliability
AT elaroussidjilali preanalyticalconditionsofpointofcaretestingintheintensivecareunitaredecisiveforanalysisreliability
AT laffonmarc preanalyticalconditionsofpointofcaretestingintheintensivecareunitaredecisiveforanalysisreliability
AT andreschristianr preanalyticalconditionsofpointofcaretestingintheintensivecareunitaredecisiveforanalysisreliability
AT legrasannick preanalyticalconditionsofpointofcaretestingintheintensivecareunitaredecisiveforanalysisreliability
AT ehrmannstephan preanalyticalconditionsofpointofcaretestingintheintensivecareunitaredecisiveforanalysisreliability
AT dequinpierrefrancois preanalyticalconditionsofpointofcaretestingintheintensivecareunitaredecisiveforanalysisreliability
AT gendrotchantal preanalyticalconditionsofpointofcaretestingintheintensivecareunitaredecisiveforanalysisreliability
AT guillonantoine preanalyticalconditionsofpointofcaretestingintheintensivecareunitaredecisiveforanalysisreliability