Cargando…
Breaking Barriers to Effective Type 2 Diabetes Management: Findings from the use of the OPTIMA© Questionnaire in Clinical Practice
BACKGROUND: The OPTIMA© (MSD, Courbevoie, France) questionnaire was developed to promote shared decisions and the set-up of specific micro-objectives in clinical practice by optimizing communication between type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients and their physicians. The present study aimed to assess OPTIM...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4920846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27193870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0341-6 |
_version_ | 1782439444044840960 |
---|---|
author | Grimaldi, André Penfornis, Alfred Consoli, Silla Falissard, Bruno Eymard, Elisabeth Williams, Paul Dejager, Sylvie |
author_facet | Grimaldi, André Penfornis, Alfred Consoli, Silla Falissard, Bruno Eymard, Elisabeth Williams, Paul Dejager, Sylvie |
author_sort | Grimaldi, André |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The OPTIMA© (MSD, Courbevoie, France) questionnaire was developed to promote shared decisions and the set-up of specific micro-objectives in clinical practice by optimizing communication between type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients and their physicians. The present study aimed to assess OPTIMA in clinical practice. METHODS: A cross-sectional multicenter observational study was conducted in France from 2012 to 2014. During routine consultation, patients completed one of the five modules of the OPTIMA questionnaire (Physical activity, Diet, Treatment, Knowledge of the disease or Self-monitoring of blood glucose). The rate of SMART (specific, measurable, acceptable, realistic, timely) micro-objective set-up following the use of the questionnaire was assessed. Data on how patients felt about their diabetes management (beliefs concerning actions, how easy they were to do and how often they were done in practice) were gathered. Finally, patients’ and physicians’ opinions on OPTIMA were assessed using the PRAgmatic Content and face validity Test (PRAC-Test© (Mapi, Lyon, France) evaluation questionnaire. RESULTS: Overall, 807 patients were included by 186 physicians. While 92.7 % of consultations led to the set-up of a micro-objective, only 22.3 % were SMART micro-objectives: Physical activity module (34.3 %), Diet module (9.6 %), Treatment module (16.4 %), Knowledge of the disease module (25.2 %), and self-monitoring of blood glucose module (29.5 %). Among patients completing the Physical activity module, 79.0 % reported that they believed physical activity was useful, 35.0 % that it was easy, and 25.8 % that they regularly practised it. PRAC-Test results showed that OPTIMA was a useful and easy-to-use questionnaire that promotes communication between physicians and their patients according to 92.8 % of patients and 69.4 % of physicians. CONCLUSION: The OPTIMA questionnaire facilitates communication between patients and their physicians and promotes the set-up of micro-objectives concerning T2DM management. The Physical activity module was the most likely of the five modules in the questionnaire to lead to the set-up of SMART micro-objectives. FUNDING: MSD France. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12325-016-0341-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4920846 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49208462016-07-12 Breaking Barriers to Effective Type 2 Diabetes Management: Findings from the use of the OPTIMA© Questionnaire in Clinical Practice Grimaldi, André Penfornis, Alfred Consoli, Silla Falissard, Bruno Eymard, Elisabeth Williams, Paul Dejager, Sylvie Adv Ther Original Research BACKGROUND: The OPTIMA© (MSD, Courbevoie, France) questionnaire was developed to promote shared decisions and the set-up of specific micro-objectives in clinical practice by optimizing communication between type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients and their physicians. The present study aimed to assess OPTIMA in clinical practice. METHODS: A cross-sectional multicenter observational study was conducted in France from 2012 to 2014. During routine consultation, patients completed one of the five modules of the OPTIMA questionnaire (Physical activity, Diet, Treatment, Knowledge of the disease or Self-monitoring of blood glucose). The rate of SMART (specific, measurable, acceptable, realistic, timely) micro-objective set-up following the use of the questionnaire was assessed. Data on how patients felt about their diabetes management (beliefs concerning actions, how easy they were to do and how often they were done in practice) were gathered. Finally, patients’ and physicians’ opinions on OPTIMA were assessed using the PRAgmatic Content and face validity Test (PRAC-Test© (Mapi, Lyon, France) evaluation questionnaire. RESULTS: Overall, 807 patients were included by 186 physicians. While 92.7 % of consultations led to the set-up of a micro-objective, only 22.3 % were SMART micro-objectives: Physical activity module (34.3 %), Diet module (9.6 %), Treatment module (16.4 %), Knowledge of the disease module (25.2 %), and self-monitoring of blood glucose module (29.5 %). Among patients completing the Physical activity module, 79.0 % reported that they believed physical activity was useful, 35.0 % that it was easy, and 25.8 % that they regularly practised it. PRAC-Test results showed that OPTIMA was a useful and easy-to-use questionnaire that promotes communication between physicians and their patients according to 92.8 % of patients and 69.4 % of physicians. CONCLUSION: The OPTIMA questionnaire facilitates communication between patients and their physicians and promotes the set-up of micro-objectives concerning T2DM management. The Physical activity module was the most likely of the five modules in the questionnaire to lead to the set-up of SMART micro-objectives. FUNDING: MSD France. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12325-016-0341-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2016-05-18 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4920846/ /pubmed/27193870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0341-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Grimaldi, André Penfornis, Alfred Consoli, Silla Falissard, Bruno Eymard, Elisabeth Williams, Paul Dejager, Sylvie Breaking Barriers to Effective Type 2 Diabetes Management: Findings from the use of the OPTIMA© Questionnaire in Clinical Practice |
title | Breaking Barriers to Effective Type 2 Diabetes Management: Findings from the use of the OPTIMA© Questionnaire in Clinical Practice |
title_full | Breaking Barriers to Effective Type 2 Diabetes Management: Findings from the use of the OPTIMA© Questionnaire in Clinical Practice |
title_fullStr | Breaking Barriers to Effective Type 2 Diabetes Management: Findings from the use of the OPTIMA© Questionnaire in Clinical Practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Breaking Barriers to Effective Type 2 Diabetes Management: Findings from the use of the OPTIMA© Questionnaire in Clinical Practice |
title_short | Breaking Barriers to Effective Type 2 Diabetes Management: Findings from the use of the OPTIMA© Questionnaire in Clinical Practice |
title_sort | breaking barriers to effective type 2 diabetes management: findings from the use of the optima© questionnaire in clinical practice |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4920846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27193870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0341-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grimaldiandre breakingbarrierstoeffectivetype2diabetesmanagementfindingsfromtheuseoftheoptimaquestionnaireinclinicalpractice AT penfornisalfred breakingbarrierstoeffectivetype2diabetesmanagementfindingsfromtheuseoftheoptimaquestionnaireinclinicalpractice AT consolisilla breakingbarrierstoeffectivetype2diabetesmanagementfindingsfromtheuseoftheoptimaquestionnaireinclinicalpractice AT falissardbruno breakingbarrierstoeffectivetype2diabetesmanagementfindingsfromtheuseoftheoptimaquestionnaireinclinicalpractice AT eymardelisabeth breakingbarrierstoeffectivetype2diabetesmanagementfindingsfromtheuseoftheoptimaquestionnaireinclinicalpractice AT williamspaul breakingbarrierstoeffectivetype2diabetesmanagementfindingsfromtheuseoftheoptimaquestionnaireinclinicalpractice AT dejagersylvie breakingbarrierstoeffectivetype2diabetesmanagementfindingsfromtheuseoftheoptimaquestionnaireinclinicalpractice |