Cargando…

Development and Validation of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS)

BACKGROUND: The Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) provides a reliable method to assess the quality of mobile health (mHealth) apps. However, training and expertise in mHealth and the relevant health field is required to administer it. OBJECTIVE: This study describes the development and reliabil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stoyanov, Stoyan R, Hides, Leanne, Kavanagh, David J, Wilson, Hollie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4920963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27287964
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.5849
_version_ 1782439453829103616
author Stoyanov, Stoyan R
Hides, Leanne
Kavanagh, David J
Wilson, Hollie
author_facet Stoyanov, Stoyan R
Hides, Leanne
Kavanagh, David J
Wilson, Hollie
author_sort Stoyanov, Stoyan R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) provides a reliable method to assess the quality of mobile health (mHealth) apps. However, training and expertise in mHealth and the relevant health field is required to administer it. OBJECTIVE: This study describes the development and reliability testing of an end-user version of the MARS (uMARS). METHODS: The MARS was simplified and piloted with 13 young people to create the uMARS. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the uMARS was then examined in a second sample of 164 young people participating in a randomized controlled trial of a mHealth app. App ratings were collected using the uMARS at 1-, 3,- and 6-month follow up. RESULTS: The uMARS had excellent internal consistency (alpha = .90), with high individual alphas for all subscales. The total score and subscales had good test-retest reliability over both 1-2 months and 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: The uMARS is a simple tool that can be reliably used by end-users to assess the quality of mHealth apps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4920963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49209632016-07-11 Development and Validation of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS) Stoyanov, Stoyan R Hides, Leanne Kavanagh, David J Wilson, Hollie JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Original Paper BACKGROUND: The Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) provides a reliable method to assess the quality of mobile health (mHealth) apps. However, training and expertise in mHealth and the relevant health field is required to administer it. OBJECTIVE: This study describes the development and reliability testing of an end-user version of the MARS (uMARS). METHODS: The MARS was simplified and piloted with 13 young people to create the uMARS. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the uMARS was then examined in a second sample of 164 young people participating in a randomized controlled trial of a mHealth app. App ratings were collected using the uMARS at 1-, 3,- and 6-month follow up. RESULTS: The uMARS had excellent internal consistency (alpha = .90), with high individual alphas for all subscales. The total score and subscales had good test-retest reliability over both 1-2 months and 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: The uMARS is a simple tool that can be reliably used by end-users to assess the quality of mHealth apps. JMIR Publications 2016-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4920963/ /pubmed/27287964 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.5849 Text en ©Stoyan R Stoyanov, Leanne Hides, David J Kavanagh, Hollie Wilson. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 10.06.2016. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Stoyanov, Stoyan R
Hides, Leanne
Kavanagh, David J
Wilson, Hollie
Development and Validation of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS)
title Development and Validation of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS)
title_full Development and Validation of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS)
title_fullStr Development and Validation of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS)
title_full_unstemmed Development and Validation of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS)
title_short Development and Validation of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS)
title_sort development and validation of the user version of the mobile application rating scale (umars)
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4920963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27287964
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.5849
work_keys_str_mv AT stoyanovstoyanr developmentandvalidationoftheuserversionofthemobileapplicationratingscaleumars
AT hidesleanne developmentandvalidationoftheuserversionofthemobileapplicationratingscaleumars
AT kavanaghdavidj developmentandvalidationoftheuserversionofthemobileapplicationratingscaleumars
AT wilsonhollie developmentandvalidationoftheuserversionofthemobileapplicationratingscaleumars