Cargando…

Enzymatic debridement for the treatment of severely burned upper extremities – early single center experiences

BACKGROUND: Severe burns of hands and arms are complex and challenging injuries. The Standard of care (SOC) – necrosectomy with skin grafting – is often associated with poor functional or aesthetic outcome. Enzymatic debridement (ED) is considered one promising alternative but, until recently, resul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cordts, Tomke, Horter, Johannes, Vogelpohl, Julian, Kremer, Thomas, Kneser, Ulrich, Hernekamp, Jochen-Frederick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4920996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27342276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12895-016-0045-2
_version_ 1782439459953836032
author Cordts, Tomke
Horter, Johannes
Vogelpohl, Julian
Kremer, Thomas
Kneser, Ulrich
Hernekamp, Jochen-Frederick
author_facet Cordts, Tomke
Horter, Johannes
Vogelpohl, Julian
Kremer, Thomas
Kneser, Ulrich
Hernekamp, Jochen-Frederick
author_sort Cordts, Tomke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Severe burns of hands and arms are complex and challenging injuries. The Standard of care (SOC) – necrosectomy with skin grafting – is often associated with poor functional or aesthetic outcome. Enzymatic debridement (ED) is considered one promising alternative but, until recently, results proved to be highly variable. METHODS: Between 04/2014 and 04/2015, 16 patients with deep partial- to full-thickness burns of the upper extremities underwent enzymatic debridement (ED) in our Burn Center and were evaluated for extent of additional surgery, wound healing, pain management and functional parameters. RESULTS: Following ED, no further surgical intervention was required in 53.8 % of the study population. In patients who required surgical treatment, the the skin-grafted area could be reduced by 37.0 % when compared to initial assessment. Time from injury to ED was 24.4 h and patients were able to start physical therapy after 2.0 days but suffered from prolonged wound closure (28.0 days). Regionally administered anesthesia proved to be superior to pain medication alone as pain levels and consumed morphine-equivalent were lower. Post-demission follow-up showed good functional results and pain levels with low scores in two self-report questionnaires (DASH, PRWE-G) but 3 patients reported increased susceptibility to shear stress. Based on these early experiences, we developed a 3-step algorithm for consecutive patients allowing appropriate and individualized treatment selection. CONCLUSIONS: We see a potential benefit for ED in the treatment of severely burned hands and forearms but further investigations and proper prospective, randomized controlled trials are needed to statistically support any outlined assumptions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12895-016-0045-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4920996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49209962016-06-26 Enzymatic debridement for the treatment of severely burned upper extremities – early single center experiences Cordts, Tomke Horter, Johannes Vogelpohl, Julian Kremer, Thomas Kneser, Ulrich Hernekamp, Jochen-Frederick BMC Dermatol Research Article BACKGROUND: Severe burns of hands and arms are complex and challenging injuries. The Standard of care (SOC) – necrosectomy with skin grafting – is often associated with poor functional or aesthetic outcome. Enzymatic debridement (ED) is considered one promising alternative but, until recently, results proved to be highly variable. METHODS: Between 04/2014 and 04/2015, 16 patients with deep partial- to full-thickness burns of the upper extremities underwent enzymatic debridement (ED) in our Burn Center and were evaluated for extent of additional surgery, wound healing, pain management and functional parameters. RESULTS: Following ED, no further surgical intervention was required in 53.8 % of the study population. In patients who required surgical treatment, the the skin-grafted area could be reduced by 37.0 % when compared to initial assessment. Time from injury to ED was 24.4 h and patients were able to start physical therapy after 2.0 days but suffered from prolonged wound closure (28.0 days). Regionally administered anesthesia proved to be superior to pain medication alone as pain levels and consumed morphine-equivalent were lower. Post-demission follow-up showed good functional results and pain levels with low scores in two self-report questionnaires (DASH, PRWE-G) but 3 patients reported increased susceptibility to shear stress. Based on these early experiences, we developed a 3-step algorithm for consecutive patients allowing appropriate and individualized treatment selection. CONCLUSIONS: We see a potential benefit for ED in the treatment of severely burned hands and forearms but further investigations and proper prospective, randomized controlled trials are needed to statistically support any outlined assumptions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12895-016-0045-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4920996/ /pubmed/27342276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12895-016-0045-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cordts, Tomke
Horter, Johannes
Vogelpohl, Julian
Kremer, Thomas
Kneser, Ulrich
Hernekamp, Jochen-Frederick
Enzymatic debridement for the treatment of severely burned upper extremities – early single center experiences
title Enzymatic debridement for the treatment of severely burned upper extremities – early single center experiences
title_full Enzymatic debridement for the treatment of severely burned upper extremities – early single center experiences
title_fullStr Enzymatic debridement for the treatment of severely burned upper extremities – early single center experiences
title_full_unstemmed Enzymatic debridement for the treatment of severely burned upper extremities – early single center experiences
title_short Enzymatic debridement for the treatment of severely burned upper extremities – early single center experiences
title_sort enzymatic debridement for the treatment of severely burned upper extremities – early single center experiences
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4920996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27342276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12895-016-0045-2
work_keys_str_mv AT cordtstomke enzymaticdebridementforthetreatmentofseverelyburnedupperextremitiesearlysinglecenterexperiences
AT horterjohannes enzymaticdebridementforthetreatmentofseverelyburnedupperextremitiesearlysinglecenterexperiences
AT vogelpohljulian enzymaticdebridementforthetreatmentofseverelyburnedupperextremitiesearlysinglecenterexperiences
AT kremerthomas enzymaticdebridementforthetreatmentofseverelyburnedupperextremitiesearlysinglecenterexperiences
AT kneserulrich enzymaticdebridementforthetreatmentofseverelyburnedupperextremitiesearlysinglecenterexperiences
AT hernekampjochenfrederick enzymaticdebridementforthetreatmentofseverelyburnedupperextremitiesearlysinglecenterexperiences