Cargando…
Analysis of Power Laws, Shape Collapses, and Neural Complexity: New Techniques and MATLAB Support via the NCC Toolbox
Neural systems include interactions that occur across many scales. Two divergent methods for characterizing such interactions have drawn on the physical analysis of critical phenomena and the mathematical study of information. Inferring criticality in neural systems has traditionally rested on fitti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4921690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00250 |
_version_ | 1782439526321356800 |
---|---|
author | Marshall, Najja Timme, Nicholas M. Bennett, Nicholas Ripp, Monica Lautzenhiser, Edward Beggs, John M. |
author_facet | Marshall, Najja Timme, Nicholas M. Bennett, Nicholas Ripp, Monica Lautzenhiser, Edward Beggs, John M. |
author_sort | Marshall, Najja |
collection | PubMed |
description | Neural systems include interactions that occur across many scales. Two divergent methods for characterizing such interactions have drawn on the physical analysis of critical phenomena and the mathematical study of information. Inferring criticality in neural systems has traditionally rested on fitting power laws to the property distributions of “neural avalanches” (contiguous bursts of activity), but the fractal nature of avalanche shapes has recently emerged as another signature of criticality. On the other hand, neural complexity, an information theoretic measure, has been used to capture the interplay between the functional localization of brain regions and their integration for higher cognitive functions. Unfortunately, treatments of all three methods—power-law fitting, avalanche shape collapse, and neural complexity—have suffered from shortcomings. Empirical data often contain biases that introduce deviations from true power law in the tail and head of the distribution, but deviations in the tail have often been unconsidered; avalanche shape collapse has required manual parameter tuning; and the estimation of neural complexity has relied on small data sets or statistical assumptions for the sake of computational efficiency. In this paper we present technical advancements in the analysis of criticality and complexity in neural systems. We use maximum-likelihood estimation to automatically fit power laws with left and right cutoffs, present the first automated shape collapse algorithm, and describe new techniques to account for large numbers of neural variables and small data sets in the calculation of neural complexity. In order to facilitate future research in criticality and complexity, we have made the software utilized in this analysis freely available online in the MATLAB NCC (Neural Complexity and Criticality) Toolbox. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4921690 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49216902016-07-21 Analysis of Power Laws, Shape Collapses, and Neural Complexity: New Techniques and MATLAB Support via the NCC Toolbox Marshall, Najja Timme, Nicholas M. Bennett, Nicholas Ripp, Monica Lautzenhiser, Edward Beggs, John M. Front Physiol Physiology Neural systems include interactions that occur across many scales. Two divergent methods for characterizing such interactions have drawn on the physical analysis of critical phenomena and the mathematical study of information. Inferring criticality in neural systems has traditionally rested on fitting power laws to the property distributions of “neural avalanches” (contiguous bursts of activity), but the fractal nature of avalanche shapes has recently emerged as another signature of criticality. On the other hand, neural complexity, an information theoretic measure, has been used to capture the interplay between the functional localization of brain regions and their integration for higher cognitive functions. Unfortunately, treatments of all three methods—power-law fitting, avalanche shape collapse, and neural complexity—have suffered from shortcomings. Empirical data often contain biases that introduce deviations from true power law in the tail and head of the distribution, but deviations in the tail have often been unconsidered; avalanche shape collapse has required manual parameter tuning; and the estimation of neural complexity has relied on small data sets or statistical assumptions for the sake of computational efficiency. In this paper we present technical advancements in the analysis of criticality and complexity in neural systems. We use maximum-likelihood estimation to automatically fit power laws with left and right cutoffs, present the first automated shape collapse algorithm, and describe new techniques to account for large numbers of neural variables and small data sets in the calculation of neural complexity. In order to facilitate future research in criticality and complexity, we have made the software utilized in this analysis freely available online in the MATLAB NCC (Neural Complexity and Criticality) Toolbox. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4921690/ /pubmed/27445842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00250 Text en Copyright © 2016 Marshall, Timme, Bennett, Ripp, Lautzenhiser and Beggs. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Physiology Marshall, Najja Timme, Nicholas M. Bennett, Nicholas Ripp, Monica Lautzenhiser, Edward Beggs, John M. Analysis of Power Laws, Shape Collapses, and Neural Complexity: New Techniques and MATLAB Support via the NCC Toolbox |
title | Analysis of Power Laws, Shape Collapses, and Neural Complexity: New Techniques and MATLAB Support via the NCC Toolbox |
title_full | Analysis of Power Laws, Shape Collapses, and Neural Complexity: New Techniques and MATLAB Support via the NCC Toolbox |
title_fullStr | Analysis of Power Laws, Shape Collapses, and Neural Complexity: New Techniques and MATLAB Support via the NCC Toolbox |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of Power Laws, Shape Collapses, and Neural Complexity: New Techniques and MATLAB Support via the NCC Toolbox |
title_short | Analysis of Power Laws, Shape Collapses, and Neural Complexity: New Techniques and MATLAB Support via the NCC Toolbox |
title_sort | analysis of power laws, shape collapses, and neural complexity: new techniques and matlab support via the ncc toolbox |
topic | Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4921690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00250 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marshallnajja analysisofpowerlawsshapecollapsesandneuralcomplexitynewtechniquesandmatlabsupportviathencctoolbox AT timmenicholasm analysisofpowerlawsshapecollapsesandneuralcomplexitynewtechniquesandmatlabsupportviathencctoolbox AT bennettnicholas analysisofpowerlawsshapecollapsesandneuralcomplexitynewtechniquesandmatlabsupportviathencctoolbox AT rippmonica analysisofpowerlawsshapecollapsesandneuralcomplexitynewtechniquesandmatlabsupportviathencctoolbox AT lautzenhiseredward analysisofpowerlawsshapecollapsesandneuralcomplexitynewtechniquesandmatlabsupportviathencctoolbox AT beggsjohnm analysisofpowerlawsshapecollapsesandneuralcomplexitynewtechniquesandmatlabsupportviathencctoolbox |