Cargando…
A randomized phase III trial comparing S-1 versus UFT as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II/III rectal cancer (JFMC35-C1: ACTS-RC)
BACKGROUNDS: Preventing distant recurrence and achieving local control are important challenges in rectal cancer treatment, and use of adjuvant chemotherapy has been studied. However, no phase III study comparing adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for rectal cancer has demonstrated superiority of a spec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4922318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27056996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw162 |
_version_ | 1782439602307465216 |
---|---|
author | Oki, E. Murata, A. Yoshida, K. Maeda, K. Ikejiri, K. Munemoto, Y. Sasaki, K. Matsuda, C. Kotake, M. Suenaga, T. Matsuda, H. Emi, Y. Kakeji, Y. Baba, H. Hamada, C. Saji, S. Maehara, Y. |
author_facet | Oki, E. Murata, A. Yoshida, K. Maeda, K. Ikejiri, K. Munemoto, Y. Sasaki, K. Matsuda, C. Kotake, M. Suenaga, T. Matsuda, H. Emi, Y. Kakeji, Y. Baba, H. Hamada, C. Saji, S. Maehara, Y. |
author_sort | Oki, E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUNDS: Preventing distant recurrence and achieving local control are important challenges in rectal cancer treatment, and use of adjuvant chemotherapy has been studied. However, no phase III study comparing adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for rectal cancer has demonstrated superiority of a specific regimen. We therefore conducted a phase III study to evaluate the superiority of S-1 to tegafur–uracil (UFT), a standard adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for curatively resected stage II/III rectal cancer in Japan, in the adjuvant setting for rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The ACTS-RC trial was an open-label, randomized, phase III superiority trial conducted at 222 sites in Japan. Patients aged 20–80 with stage II/III rectal cancer undergoing curative surgery without preoperative therapy were randomly assigned to receive UFT (500–600 mg/day on days 1–5, followed by 2 days rest) or S-1 (80–120 mg/day on days 1–28, followed by 14 days rest) for 1 year. The primary end point was relapse-free survival (RFS), and the secondary end points were overall survival and adverse events. RESULTS: In total, 961 patients were enrolled from April 2006 to March 2009. The primary analysis was conducted in 480 assigned to receive UFT and 479 assigned to receive S-1. Five-year RFS was 61.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 57.1% to 65.9%] for UFT and 66.4% (95% CI 61.9% to 70.5%) for S-1 [P = 0.0165, hazard ratio (HR): 0.77, 95% CI 0.63–0.96]. Five-year survival was 80.2% (95% CI 76.3% to 83.5%) for UFT and 82.0% (95% CI 78.3% to 85.2%) for S-1. The main grade 3 or higher adverse events were increased alanine aminotransferase and diarrhea (each 2.3%) in the UFT arm and anorexia, diarrhea (each 2.6%), and fatigue (2.1%) in the S-1 arm. CONCLUSION: One-year S-1 treatment is superior to UFT with respect to RFS and has therefore become a standard adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for stage II/III rectal cancer following curative resection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4922318 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49223182016-07-05 A randomized phase III trial comparing S-1 versus UFT as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II/III rectal cancer (JFMC35-C1: ACTS-RC) Oki, E. Murata, A. Yoshida, K. Maeda, K. Ikejiri, K. Munemoto, Y. Sasaki, K. Matsuda, C. Kotake, M. Suenaga, T. Matsuda, H. Emi, Y. Kakeji, Y. Baba, H. Hamada, C. Saji, S. Maehara, Y. Ann Oncol Original Articles BACKGROUNDS: Preventing distant recurrence and achieving local control are important challenges in rectal cancer treatment, and use of adjuvant chemotherapy has been studied. However, no phase III study comparing adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for rectal cancer has demonstrated superiority of a specific regimen. We therefore conducted a phase III study to evaluate the superiority of S-1 to tegafur–uracil (UFT), a standard adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for curatively resected stage II/III rectal cancer in Japan, in the adjuvant setting for rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The ACTS-RC trial was an open-label, randomized, phase III superiority trial conducted at 222 sites in Japan. Patients aged 20–80 with stage II/III rectal cancer undergoing curative surgery without preoperative therapy were randomly assigned to receive UFT (500–600 mg/day on days 1–5, followed by 2 days rest) or S-1 (80–120 mg/day on days 1–28, followed by 14 days rest) for 1 year. The primary end point was relapse-free survival (RFS), and the secondary end points were overall survival and adverse events. RESULTS: In total, 961 patients were enrolled from April 2006 to March 2009. The primary analysis was conducted in 480 assigned to receive UFT and 479 assigned to receive S-1. Five-year RFS was 61.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 57.1% to 65.9%] for UFT and 66.4% (95% CI 61.9% to 70.5%) for S-1 [P = 0.0165, hazard ratio (HR): 0.77, 95% CI 0.63–0.96]. Five-year survival was 80.2% (95% CI 76.3% to 83.5%) for UFT and 82.0% (95% CI 78.3% to 85.2%) for S-1. The main grade 3 or higher adverse events were increased alanine aminotransferase and diarrhea (each 2.3%) in the UFT arm and anorexia, diarrhea (each 2.6%), and fatigue (2.1%) in the S-1 arm. CONCLUSION: One-year S-1 treatment is superior to UFT with respect to RFS and has therefore become a standard adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for stage II/III rectal cancer following curative resection. Oxford University Press 2016-07 2016-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4922318/ /pubmed/27056996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw162 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Oki, E. Murata, A. Yoshida, K. Maeda, K. Ikejiri, K. Munemoto, Y. Sasaki, K. Matsuda, C. Kotake, M. Suenaga, T. Matsuda, H. Emi, Y. Kakeji, Y. Baba, H. Hamada, C. Saji, S. Maehara, Y. A randomized phase III trial comparing S-1 versus UFT as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II/III rectal cancer (JFMC35-C1: ACTS-RC) |
title | A randomized phase III trial comparing S-1 versus UFT as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II/III rectal cancer (JFMC35-C1: ACTS-RC) |
title_full | A randomized phase III trial comparing S-1 versus UFT as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II/III rectal cancer (JFMC35-C1: ACTS-RC) |
title_fullStr | A randomized phase III trial comparing S-1 versus UFT as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II/III rectal cancer (JFMC35-C1: ACTS-RC) |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized phase III trial comparing S-1 versus UFT as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II/III rectal cancer (JFMC35-C1: ACTS-RC) |
title_short | A randomized phase III trial comparing S-1 versus UFT as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II/III rectal cancer (JFMC35-C1: ACTS-RC) |
title_sort | randomized phase iii trial comparing s-1 versus uft as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage ii/iii rectal cancer (jfmc35-c1: acts-rc) |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4922318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27056996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw162 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT okie arandomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT murataa arandomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT yoshidak arandomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT maedak arandomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT ikejirik arandomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT munemotoy arandomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT sasakik arandomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT matsudac arandomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT kotakem arandomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT suenagat arandomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT matsudah arandomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT emiy arandomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT kakejiy arandomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT babah arandomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT hamadac arandomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT sajis arandomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT maeharay arandomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT okie randomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT murataa randomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT yoshidak randomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT maedak randomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT ikejirik randomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT munemotoy randomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT sasakik randomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT matsudac randomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT kotakem randomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT suenagat randomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT matsudah randomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT emiy randomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT kakejiy randomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT babah randomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT hamadac randomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT sajis randomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc AT maeharay randomizedphaseiiitrialcomparings1versusuftasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiirectalcancerjfmc35c1actsrc |