Cargando…

The Schistosomiasis Clinical Trials Landscape: A Systematic Review of Antischistosomal Treatment Efficacy Studies and a Case for Sharing Individual Participant-Level Data (IPD)

BACKGROUND: Schistosomiasis control mainly relies on preventive chemotherapy with praziquantel (PZQ) distributed through mass drug administration. With a target of 260 million treatments yearly, reliably assessing and monitoring efficacy is all-important. Recommendations for treatment and control of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Julé, Amélie M., Vaillant, Michel, Lang, Trudie A., Guérin, Philippe J., Olliaro, Piero L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4922574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27347678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004784
_version_ 1782439632013623296
author Julé, Amélie M.
Vaillant, Michel
Lang, Trudie A.
Guérin, Philippe J.
Olliaro, Piero L.
author_facet Julé, Amélie M.
Vaillant, Michel
Lang, Trudie A.
Guérin, Philippe J.
Olliaro, Piero L.
author_sort Julé, Amélie M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Schistosomiasis control mainly relies on preventive chemotherapy with praziquantel (PZQ) distributed through mass drug administration. With a target of 260 million treatments yearly, reliably assessing and monitoring efficacy is all-important. Recommendations for treatment and control of schistosomiasis are supported by systematic reviews and meta-analyses of aggregated data, which however also point to limitations due to heterogeneity in trial design, analyses and reporting. Some such limitations could be corrected through access to individual participant-level data (IPD), which facilitates standardised analyses. METHODOLOGY: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify antischistosomal drug efficacy studies performed since 2000; including electronic searches of the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group specialised register and the Cochrane Library, PubMed, CENTRAL and Embase; complemented with a manual search for articles listed in past reviews. Antischistosomal treatment studies with assessment of outcome within 60 days post-treatment were eligible. Meta-data, i.e. study-level characteristics (Schistosoma species, number of patients, drug administered, country, etc.) and efficacy parameters were extracted from published documents to evaluate the scope of an individual-level data sharing platform. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Out of 914 documents screened, 90 studies from 26 countries were included, enrolling 20,517 participants infected with Schistosoma spp. and treated with different PZQ regimens or other drugs. Methodologies varied in terms of diagnostic approaches (number of samples and test repeats), time of outcome assessment, and outcome measure (cure rate or egg reduction rate, as an arithmetic or geometric mean), making direct comparison of published data difficult. CONCLUSIONS: This review describes the landscape of schistosomiasis clinical research. The volume of data and the methodological and reporting heterogeneity identified all indicate that there is scope for an individual participant-level database, to allow for standardised analyses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4922574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49225742016-07-18 The Schistosomiasis Clinical Trials Landscape: A Systematic Review of Antischistosomal Treatment Efficacy Studies and a Case for Sharing Individual Participant-Level Data (IPD) Julé, Amélie M. Vaillant, Michel Lang, Trudie A. Guérin, Philippe J. Olliaro, Piero L. PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Schistosomiasis control mainly relies on preventive chemotherapy with praziquantel (PZQ) distributed through mass drug administration. With a target of 260 million treatments yearly, reliably assessing and monitoring efficacy is all-important. Recommendations for treatment and control of schistosomiasis are supported by systematic reviews and meta-analyses of aggregated data, which however also point to limitations due to heterogeneity in trial design, analyses and reporting. Some such limitations could be corrected through access to individual participant-level data (IPD), which facilitates standardised analyses. METHODOLOGY: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify antischistosomal drug efficacy studies performed since 2000; including electronic searches of the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group specialised register and the Cochrane Library, PubMed, CENTRAL and Embase; complemented with a manual search for articles listed in past reviews. Antischistosomal treatment studies with assessment of outcome within 60 days post-treatment were eligible. Meta-data, i.e. study-level characteristics (Schistosoma species, number of patients, drug administered, country, etc.) and efficacy parameters were extracted from published documents to evaluate the scope of an individual-level data sharing platform. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Out of 914 documents screened, 90 studies from 26 countries were included, enrolling 20,517 participants infected with Schistosoma spp. and treated with different PZQ regimens or other drugs. Methodologies varied in terms of diagnostic approaches (number of samples and test repeats), time of outcome assessment, and outcome measure (cure rate or egg reduction rate, as an arithmetic or geometric mean), making direct comparison of published data difficult. CONCLUSIONS: This review describes the landscape of schistosomiasis clinical research. The volume of data and the methodological and reporting heterogeneity identified all indicate that there is scope for an individual participant-level database, to allow for standardised analyses. Public Library of Science 2016-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4922574/ /pubmed/27347678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004784 Text en © 2016 Julé et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Julé, Amélie M.
Vaillant, Michel
Lang, Trudie A.
Guérin, Philippe J.
Olliaro, Piero L.
The Schistosomiasis Clinical Trials Landscape: A Systematic Review of Antischistosomal Treatment Efficacy Studies and a Case for Sharing Individual Participant-Level Data (IPD)
title The Schistosomiasis Clinical Trials Landscape: A Systematic Review of Antischistosomal Treatment Efficacy Studies and a Case for Sharing Individual Participant-Level Data (IPD)
title_full The Schistosomiasis Clinical Trials Landscape: A Systematic Review of Antischistosomal Treatment Efficacy Studies and a Case for Sharing Individual Participant-Level Data (IPD)
title_fullStr The Schistosomiasis Clinical Trials Landscape: A Systematic Review of Antischistosomal Treatment Efficacy Studies and a Case for Sharing Individual Participant-Level Data (IPD)
title_full_unstemmed The Schistosomiasis Clinical Trials Landscape: A Systematic Review of Antischistosomal Treatment Efficacy Studies and a Case for Sharing Individual Participant-Level Data (IPD)
title_short The Schistosomiasis Clinical Trials Landscape: A Systematic Review of Antischistosomal Treatment Efficacy Studies and a Case for Sharing Individual Participant-Level Data (IPD)
title_sort schistosomiasis clinical trials landscape: a systematic review of antischistosomal treatment efficacy studies and a case for sharing individual participant-level data (ipd)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4922574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27347678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004784
work_keys_str_mv AT juleameliem theschistosomiasisclinicaltrialslandscapeasystematicreviewofantischistosomaltreatmentefficacystudiesandacaseforsharingindividualparticipantleveldataipd
AT vaillantmichel theschistosomiasisclinicaltrialslandscapeasystematicreviewofantischistosomaltreatmentefficacystudiesandacaseforsharingindividualparticipantleveldataipd
AT langtrudiea theschistosomiasisclinicaltrialslandscapeasystematicreviewofantischistosomaltreatmentefficacystudiesandacaseforsharingindividualparticipantleveldataipd
AT guerinphilippej theschistosomiasisclinicaltrialslandscapeasystematicreviewofantischistosomaltreatmentefficacystudiesandacaseforsharingindividualparticipantleveldataipd
AT olliaropierol theschistosomiasisclinicaltrialslandscapeasystematicreviewofantischistosomaltreatmentefficacystudiesandacaseforsharingindividualparticipantleveldataipd
AT juleameliem schistosomiasisclinicaltrialslandscapeasystematicreviewofantischistosomaltreatmentefficacystudiesandacaseforsharingindividualparticipantleveldataipd
AT vaillantmichel schistosomiasisclinicaltrialslandscapeasystematicreviewofantischistosomaltreatmentefficacystudiesandacaseforsharingindividualparticipantleveldataipd
AT langtrudiea schistosomiasisclinicaltrialslandscapeasystematicreviewofantischistosomaltreatmentefficacystudiesandacaseforsharingindividualparticipantleveldataipd
AT guerinphilippej schistosomiasisclinicaltrialslandscapeasystematicreviewofantischistosomaltreatmentefficacystudiesandacaseforsharingindividualparticipantleveldataipd
AT olliaropierol schistosomiasisclinicaltrialslandscapeasystematicreviewofantischistosomaltreatmentefficacystudiesandacaseforsharingindividualparticipantleveldataipd