Cargando…
Evaluating Abstract Art: Relation between Term Usage, Subjective Ratings, Image Properties and Personality Traits
One of the major challenges in experimental aesthetics is the uncertainty of the terminology used in experiments. In this study, we recorded terms that are spontaneously used by participants to describe abstract artworks and studied their relation to the second-order statistical image properties of...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4923070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445933 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00973 |
_version_ | 1782439676594880512 |
---|---|
author | Lyssenko, Nathalie Redies, Christoph Hayn-Leichsenring, Gregor U. |
author_facet | Lyssenko, Nathalie Redies, Christoph Hayn-Leichsenring, Gregor U. |
author_sort | Lyssenko, Nathalie |
collection | PubMed |
description | One of the major challenges in experimental aesthetics is the uncertainty of the terminology used in experiments. In this study, we recorded terms that are spontaneously used by participants to describe abstract artworks and studied their relation to the second-order statistical image properties of the same artworks (Experiment 1). We found that the usage frequency of some structure-describing terms correlates with statistical image properties, such as PHOG Self-Similarity, Anisotropy and Complexity. Additionally, emotion-associated terms correlate with measured color values. Next, based on the most frequently used terms, we created five different rating scales (Experiment 2) and obtained ratings of participants for the abstract paintings on these scales. We found significant correlations between descriptive score ratings (e.g., between structure and subjective complexity), between evaluative and descriptive score ratings (e.g., between preference and subjective complexity/interest) and between descriptive score ratings and statistical image properties (e.g., between interest and PHOG Self-Similarity, Complexity and Anisotropy). Additionally, we determined the participants’ personality traits as described in the ‘Big Five Inventory’ (Goldberg, 1990; Rammstedt and John, 2005) and correlated them with the ratings and preferences of individual participants. Participants with higher scores for Neuroticism showed preferences for objectively more complex images, as well as a different notion of the term complex when compared with participants with lower scores for Neuroticism. In conclusion, this study demonstrates an association between objectively measured image properties and the subjective terms that participants use to describe or evaluate abstract artworks. Moreover, our results suggest that the description of abstract artworks, their evaluation and the preference of participants for their low-level statistical properties are linked to personality traits. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4923070 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49230702016-07-21 Evaluating Abstract Art: Relation between Term Usage, Subjective Ratings, Image Properties and Personality Traits Lyssenko, Nathalie Redies, Christoph Hayn-Leichsenring, Gregor U. Front Psychol Psychology One of the major challenges in experimental aesthetics is the uncertainty of the terminology used in experiments. In this study, we recorded terms that are spontaneously used by participants to describe abstract artworks and studied their relation to the second-order statistical image properties of the same artworks (Experiment 1). We found that the usage frequency of some structure-describing terms correlates with statistical image properties, such as PHOG Self-Similarity, Anisotropy and Complexity. Additionally, emotion-associated terms correlate with measured color values. Next, based on the most frequently used terms, we created five different rating scales (Experiment 2) and obtained ratings of participants for the abstract paintings on these scales. We found significant correlations between descriptive score ratings (e.g., between structure and subjective complexity), between evaluative and descriptive score ratings (e.g., between preference and subjective complexity/interest) and between descriptive score ratings and statistical image properties (e.g., between interest and PHOG Self-Similarity, Complexity and Anisotropy). Additionally, we determined the participants’ personality traits as described in the ‘Big Five Inventory’ (Goldberg, 1990; Rammstedt and John, 2005) and correlated them with the ratings and preferences of individual participants. Participants with higher scores for Neuroticism showed preferences for objectively more complex images, as well as a different notion of the term complex when compared with participants with lower scores for Neuroticism. In conclusion, this study demonstrates an association between objectively measured image properties and the subjective terms that participants use to describe or evaluate abstract artworks. Moreover, our results suggest that the description of abstract artworks, their evaluation and the preference of participants for their low-level statistical properties are linked to personality traits. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4923070/ /pubmed/27445933 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00973 Text en Copyright © 2016 Lyssenko, Redies and Hayn-Leichsenring. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Lyssenko, Nathalie Redies, Christoph Hayn-Leichsenring, Gregor U. Evaluating Abstract Art: Relation between Term Usage, Subjective Ratings, Image Properties and Personality Traits |
title | Evaluating Abstract Art: Relation between Term Usage, Subjective Ratings, Image Properties and Personality Traits |
title_full | Evaluating Abstract Art: Relation between Term Usage, Subjective Ratings, Image Properties and Personality Traits |
title_fullStr | Evaluating Abstract Art: Relation between Term Usage, Subjective Ratings, Image Properties and Personality Traits |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating Abstract Art: Relation between Term Usage, Subjective Ratings, Image Properties and Personality Traits |
title_short | Evaluating Abstract Art: Relation between Term Usage, Subjective Ratings, Image Properties and Personality Traits |
title_sort | evaluating abstract art: relation between term usage, subjective ratings, image properties and personality traits |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4923070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445933 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00973 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lyssenkonathalie evaluatingabstractartrelationbetweentermusagesubjectiveratingsimagepropertiesandpersonalitytraits AT redieschristoph evaluatingabstractartrelationbetweentermusagesubjectiveratingsimagepropertiesandpersonalitytraits AT haynleichsenringgregoru evaluatingabstractartrelationbetweentermusagesubjectiveratingsimagepropertiesandpersonalitytraits |