Cargando…

A comparison of X-ray and calculated structures of the enzyme MTH1

Modern computational chemistry methods provide a powerful tool for use in refining the geometry of proteins determined by X-ray crystallography. Specifically, computational methods can be used to correctly place hydrogen atoms unresolved by this experimental method and improve bond geometry accuracy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ryan, Hannah, Carter, Megan, Stenmark, Pål, Stewart, James J. P., Braun-Sand, Sonja B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4923096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27350386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00894-016-3025-x
_version_ 1782439682449080320
author Ryan, Hannah
Carter, Megan
Stenmark, Pål
Stewart, James J. P.
Braun-Sand, Sonja B.
author_facet Ryan, Hannah
Carter, Megan
Stenmark, Pål
Stewart, James J. P.
Braun-Sand, Sonja B.
author_sort Ryan, Hannah
collection PubMed
description Modern computational chemistry methods provide a powerful tool for use in refining the geometry of proteins determined by X-ray crystallography. Specifically, computational methods can be used to correctly place hydrogen atoms unresolved by this experimental method and improve bond geometry accuracy. Using the semiempirical method PM7, the structure of the nucleotide-sanitizing enzyme MTH1, complete with hydrolyzed substrate 8-oxo-dGMP, was optimized and the resulting geometry compared with the original X-ray structure of MTH1. After determining hydrogen atom placement and the identification of ionized sites, the charge distribution in the binding site was explored. Where comparison was possible, all the theoretical predictions were in good agreement with experimental observations. However, when these were combined with additional predictions for which experimental observations were not available, the result was a new and alternative description of the substrate-binding site interaction. An estimate was made of the strengths and weaknesses of the PM7 method for modeling proteins on varying scales, ranging from overall structure to individual interatomic distances. An attempt to correct a known fault in PM7, the under-estimation of steric repulsion, is also described. This work sheds light on the specificity of the enzyme MTH1 toward the substrate 8-oxo-dGTP; information that would facilitate drug development involving MTH1. [Figure: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4923096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49230962016-07-22 A comparison of X-ray and calculated structures of the enzyme MTH1 Ryan, Hannah Carter, Megan Stenmark, Pål Stewart, James J. P. Braun-Sand, Sonja B. J Mol Model Original Paper Modern computational chemistry methods provide a powerful tool for use in refining the geometry of proteins determined by X-ray crystallography. Specifically, computational methods can be used to correctly place hydrogen atoms unresolved by this experimental method and improve bond geometry accuracy. Using the semiempirical method PM7, the structure of the nucleotide-sanitizing enzyme MTH1, complete with hydrolyzed substrate 8-oxo-dGMP, was optimized and the resulting geometry compared with the original X-ray structure of MTH1. After determining hydrogen atom placement and the identification of ionized sites, the charge distribution in the binding site was explored. Where comparison was possible, all the theoretical predictions were in good agreement with experimental observations. However, when these were combined with additional predictions for which experimental observations were not available, the result was a new and alternative description of the substrate-binding site interaction. An estimate was made of the strengths and weaknesses of the PM7 method for modeling proteins on varying scales, ranging from overall structure to individual interatomic distances. An attempt to correct a known fault in PM7, the under-estimation of steric repulsion, is also described. This work sheds light on the specificity of the enzyme MTH1 toward the substrate 8-oxo-dGTP; information that would facilitate drug development involving MTH1. [Figure: see text] Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-06-27 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4923096/ /pubmed/27350386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00894-016-3025-x Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Ryan, Hannah
Carter, Megan
Stenmark, Pål
Stewart, James J. P.
Braun-Sand, Sonja B.
A comparison of X-ray and calculated structures of the enzyme MTH1
title A comparison of X-ray and calculated structures of the enzyme MTH1
title_full A comparison of X-ray and calculated structures of the enzyme MTH1
title_fullStr A comparison of X-ray and calculated structures of the enzyme MTH1
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of X-ray and calculated structures of the enzyme MTH1
title_short A comparison of X-ray and calculated structures of the enzyme MTH1
title_sort comparison of x-ray and calculated structures of the enzyme mth1
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4923096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27350386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00894-016-3025-x
work_keys_str_mv AT ryanhannah acomparisonofxrayandcalculatedstructuresoftheenzymemth1
AT cartermegan acomparisonofxrayandcalculatedstructuresoftheenzymemth1
AT stenmarkpal acomparisonofxrayandcalculatedstructuresoftheenzymemth1
AT stewartjamesjp acomparisonofxrayandcalculatedstructuresoftheenzymemth1
AT braunsandsonjab acomparisonofxrayandcalculatedstructuresoftheenzymemth1
AT ryanhannah comparisonofxrayandcalculatedstructuresoftheenzymemth1
AT cartermegan comparisonofxrayandcalculatedstructuresoftheenzymemth1
AT stenmarkpal comparisonofxrayandcalculatedstructuresoftheenzymemth1
AT stewartjamesjp comparisonofxrayandcalculatedstructuresoftheenzymemth1
AT braunsandsonjab comparisonofxrayandcalculatedstructuresoftheenzymemth1