Cargando…

Performance of a remote interrogation system for the in-hospital evaluation of cardiac implantable electronic devices

PURPOSE: Patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) often need device interrogation in an in-hospital environment. A diagnosis-only, remote interrogation device and process for CIED interrogation was developed to address this situation. Here, we describe our initial clinical experi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mittal, Suneet, Younge, Kevin, King-Ellison, Kelly, Hammill, Eric, Stein, Kenneth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4923098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26695500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-015-0091-4
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) often need device interrogation in an in-hospital environment. A diagnosis-only, remote interrogation device and process for CIED interrogation was developed to address this situation. Here, we describe our initial clinical experience with this system. METHODS: The LATITUDE Consult Communicator is a stand-alone interrogation-only device used to read the patient’s implanted CIED. Once retrieved, the data are securely transmitted via an analog phone line to a central server. The clinician can request a review of the transmitted data at any time. Following FDA approval, we determined the usage and performance of the system. RESULTS: Communicators (n = 53) were installed in 42 hospital facilities. The most common location was in the emergency department (n = 32, 60 %). There were 509 discreet transmissions, which were categorized as follows: no arrhythmia episodes in the past 72 h and no out of range measurements (n = 174, 34 %); arrhythmia episodes in past 72 h but no out of range measurements (n = 170, 33 %); and further review recommended (n = 130, 26 %). (In 35 [7 %] instances, interrogation without analysis was requested.) The further review interrogations were then sub-divided into those of a non-urgent and urgent nature. Overall, only 53 (10 %) of the 509 transmissions were classified as urgent. Clinicians had access to full technical consultation in ≤15 min in 89 % of instances. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate the feasibility of a new diagnosis-only, remote interrogation device and remote evaluation process for the interrogation of CIEDs in an in-hospital environment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10840-015-0091-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.