Cargando…
Performance of a remote interrogation system for the in-hospital evaluation of cardiac implantable electronic devices
PURPOSE: Patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) often need device interrogation in an in-hospital environment. A diagnosis-only, remote interrogation device and process for CIED interrogation was developed to address this situation. Here, we describe our initial clinical experi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4923098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26695500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-015-0091-4 |
_version_ | 1782439682891579392 |
---|---|
author | Mittal, Suneet Younge, Kevin King-Ellison, Kelly Hammill, Eric Stein, Kenneth |
author_facet | Mittal, Suneet Younge, Kevin King-Ellison, Kelly Hammill, Eric Stein, Kenneth |
author_sort | Mittal, Suneet |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) often need device interrogation in an in-hospital environment. A diagnosis-only, remote interrogation device and process for CIED interrogation was developed to address this situation. Here, we describe our initial clinical experience with this system. METHODS: The LATITUDE Consult Communicator is a stand-alone interrogation-only device used to read the patient’s implanted CIED. Once retrieved, the data are securely transmitted via an analog phone line to a central server. The clinician can request a review of the transmitted data at any time. Following FDA approval, we determined the usage and performance of the system. RESULTS: Communicators (n = 53) were installed in 42 hospital facilities. The most common location was in the emergency department (n = 32, 60 %). There were 509 discreet transmissions, which were categorized as follows: no arrhythmia episodes in the past 72 h and no out of range measurements (n = 174, 34 %); arrhythmia episodes in past 72 h but no out of range measurements (n = 170, 33 %); and further review recommended (n = 130, 26 %). (In 35 [7 %] instances, interrogation without analysis was requested.) The further review interrogations were then sub-divided into those of a non-urgent and urgent nature. Overall, only 53 (10 %) of the 509 transmissions were classified as urgent. Clinicians had access to full technical consultation in ≤15 min in 89 % of instances. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate the feasibility of a new diagnosis-only, remote interrogation device and remote evaluation process for the interrogation of CIEDs in an in-hospital environment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10840-015-0091-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4923098 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49230982016-07-13 Performance of a remote interrogation system for the in-hospital evaluation of cardiac implantable electronic devices Mittal, Suneet Younge, Kevin King-Ellison, Kelly Hammill, Eric Stein, Kenneth J Interv Card Electrophysiol Multimedia Report PURPOSE: Patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) often need device interrogation in an in-hospital environment. A diagnosis-only, remote interrogation device and process for CIED interrogation was developed to address this situation. Here, we describe our initial clinical experience with this system. METHODS: The LATITUDE Consult Communicator is a stand-alone interrogation-only device used to read the patient’s implanted CIED. Once retrieved, the data are securely transmitted via an analog phone line to a central server. The clinician can request a review of the transmitted data at any time. Following FDA approval, we determined the usage and performance of the system. RESULTS: Communicators (n = 53) were installed in 42 hospital facilities. The most common location was in the emergency department (n = 32, 60 %). There were 509 discreet transmissions, which were categorized as follows: no arrhythmia episodes in the past 72 h and no out of range measurements (n = 174, 34 %); arrhythmia episodes in past 72 h but no out of range measurements (n = 170, 33 %); and further review recommended (n = 130, 26 %). (In 35 [7 %] instances, interrogation without analysis was requested.) The further review interrogations were then sub-divided into those of a non-urgent and urgent nature. Overall, only 53 (10 %) of the 509 transmissions were classified as urgent. Clinicians had access to full technical consultation in ≤15 min in 89 % of instances. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate the feasibility of a new diagnosis-only, remote interrogation device and remote evaluation process for the interrogation of CIEDs in an in-hospital environment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10840-015-0091-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2015-12-22 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4923098/ /pubmed/26695500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-015-0091-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Multimedia Report Mittal, Suneet Younge, Kevin King-Ellison, Kelly Hammill, Eric Stein, Kenneth Performance of a remote interrogation system for the in-hospital evaluation of cardiac implantable electronic devices |
title | Performance of a remote interrogation system for the in-hospital evaluation of cardiac implantable electronic devices |
title_full | Performance of a remote interrogation system for the in-hospital evaluation of cardiac implantable electronic devices |
title_fullStr | Performance of a remote interrogation system for the in-hospital evaluation of cardiac implantable electronic devices |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of a remote interrogation system for the in-hospital evaluation of cardiac implantable electronic devices |
title_short | Performance of a remote interrogation system for the in-hospital evaluation of cardiac implantable electronic devices |
title_sort | performance of a remote interrogation system for the in-hospital evaluation of cardiac implantable electronic devices |
topic | Multimedia Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4923098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26695500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-015-0091-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mittalsuneet performanceofaremoteinterrogationsystemfortheinhospitalevaluationofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevices AT youngekevin performanceofaremoteinterrogationsystemfortheinhospitalevaluationofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevices AT kingellisonkelly performanceofaremoteinterrogationsystemfortheinhospitalevaluationofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevices AT hammilleric performanceofaremoteinterrogationsystemfortheinhospitalevaluationofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevices AT steinkenneth performanceofaremoteinterrogationsystemfortheinhospitalevaluationofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevices |