Cargando…

Opposing Effects of Neuronal Activity on Structural Plasticity

The connectivity of the brain is continuously adjusted to new environmental influences by several activity-dependent adaptive processes. The most investigated adaptive mechanism is activity-dependent functional or synaptic plasticity regulating the transmission efficacy of existing synapses. Another...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fauth, Michael, Tetzlaff, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4923203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445713
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2016.00075
_version_ 1782439704173477888
author Fauth, Michael
Tetzlaff, Christian
author_facet Fauth, Michael
Tetzlaff, Christian
author_sort Fauth, Michael
collection PubMed
description The connectivity of the brain is continuously adjusted to new environmental influences by several activity-dependent adaptive processes. The most investigated adaptive mechanism is activity-dependent functional or synaptic plasticity regulating the transmission efficacy of existing synapses. Another important but less prominently discussed adaptive process is structural plasticity, which changes the connectivity by the formation and deletion of synapses. In this review, we show, based on experimental evidence, that structural plasticity can be classified similar to synaptic plasticity into two categories: (i) Hebbian structural plasticity, which leads to an increase (decrease) of the number of synapses during phases of high (low) neuronal activity and (ii) homeostatic structural plasticity, which balances these changes by removing and adding synapses. Furthermore, based on experimental and theoretical insights, we argue that each type of structural plasticity fulfills a different function. While Hebbian structural changes enhance memory lifetime, storage capacity, and memory robustness, homeostatic structural plasticity self-organizes the connectivity of the neural network to assure stability. However, the link between functional synaptic and structural plasticity as well as the detailed interactions between Hebbian and homeostatic structural plasticity are more complex. This implies even richer dynamics requiring further experimental and theoretical investigations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4923203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49232032016-07-21 Opposing Effects of Neuronal Activity on Structural Plasticity Fauth, Michael Tetzlaff, Christian Front Neuroanat Neuroscience The connectivity of the brain is continuously adjusted to new environmental influences by several activity-dependent adaptive processes. The most investigated adaptive mechanism is activity-dependent functional or synaptic plasticity regulating the transmission efficacy of existing synapses. Another important but less prominently discussed adaptive process is structural plasticity, which changes the connectivity by the formation and deletion of synapses. In this review, we show, based on experimental evidence, that structural plasticity can be classified similar to synaptic plasticity into two categories: (i) Hebbian structural plasticity, which leads to an increase (decrease) of the number of synapses during phases of high (low) neuronal activity and (ii) homeostatic structural plasticity, which balances these changes by removing and adding synapses. Furthermore, based on experimental and theoretical insights, we argue that each type of structural plasticity fulfills a different function. While Hebbian structural changes enhance memory lifetime, storage capacity, and memory robustness, homeostatic structural plasticity self-organizes the connectivity of the neural network to assure stability. However, the link between functional synaptic and structural plasticity as well as the detailed interactions between Hebbian and homeostatic structural plasticity are more complex. This implies even richer dynamics requiring further experimental and theoretical investigations. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4923203/ /pubmed/27445713 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2016.00075 Text en Copyright © 2016 Fauth and Tetzlaff. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Fauth, Michael
Tetzlaff, Christian
Opposing Effects of Neuronal Activity on Structural Plasticity
title Opposing Effects of Neuronal Activity on Structural Plasticity
title_full Opposing Effects of Neuronal Activity on Structural Plasticity
title_fullStr Opposing Effects of Neuronal Activity on Structural Plasticity
title_full_unstemmed Opposing Effects of Neuronal Activity on Structural Plasticity
title_short Opposing Effects of Neuronal Activity on Structural Plasticity
title_sort opposing effects of neuronal activity on structural plasticity
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4923203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445713
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2016.00075
work_keys_str_mv AT fauthmichael opposingeffectsofneuronalactivityonstructuralplasticity
AT tetzlaffchristian opposingeffectsofneuronalactivityonstructuralplasticity