Cargando…
Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Pyelopyelostomy for Retrocaval Ureter without Excision of the Retrocaval Segment: Experience on Three Cases
Introduction. Retrocaval ureter is a rare congenital anomaly. Open surgery was the classic treatment for this condition. Laparoscopy is currently an admitted procedure to treat many urological diseases. The objective of our study is to present our experience and discuss the safety and the feasibilit...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4923527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27403160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5709134 |
_version_ | 1782439727540994048 |
---|---|
author | El Harrech, Y. Ghoundale, O. Kasmaoui, E. H. Touiti, D. |
author_facet | El Harrech, Y. Ghoundale, O. Kasmaoui, E. H. Touiti, D. |
author_sort | El Harrech, Y. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction. Retrocaval ureter is a rare congenital anomaly. Open surgery was the classic treatment for this condition. Laparoscopy is currently an admitted procedure to treat many urological diseases. The objective of our study is to present our experience and discuss the safety and the feasibility of transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelopyelostomy for treatment of retrocaval ureter (RCU). Materials and Methods. Three symptomatic patients underwent laparoscopic repair for RCU in our department. The diagnosis was suspected on the computed tomography scan (CT) and confirmed on ascending pyelography. After placement of a JJ stent, and, using the transperitoneal approach, the retro peritoneum was exposed; the ureter was identified in both sides of the vena cava. The retrocaval segment was entirely mobilized and pulled from behind of the vena cava after section of renal pelvis. A pyelopyelostomy was done in a normal anatomic position. Results. All operations were achieved laparoscopically without conversion to open surgery. The mean operative time was 140 minutes (110–190). No intraoperative complication occurred. Blood loss was less than 50 mL in all patients. The mean hospital stay was 5 days (4–6 days). All patients were symptom-free after surgery and had reduction of hydronephrosis in control imagery. Conclusion. Laparoscopy seems safe, feasible, and reproducible in managing retrocaval ureter. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4923527 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49235272016-07-11 Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Pyelopyelostomy for Retrocaval Ureter without Excision of the Retrocaval Segment: Experience on Three Cases El Harrech, Y. Ghoundale, O. Kasmaoui, E. H. Touiti, D. Adv Urol Research Article Introduction. Retrocaval ureter is a rare congenital anomaly. Open surgery was the classic treatment for this condition. Laparoscopy is currently an admitted procedure to treat many urological diseases. The objective of our study is to present our experience and discuss the safety and the feasibility of transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelopyelostomy for treatment of retrocaval ureter (RCU). Materials and Methods. Three symptomatic patients underwent laparoscopic repair for RCU in our department. The diagnosis was suspected on the computed tomography scan (CT) and confirmed on ascending pyelography. After placement of a JJ stent, and, using the transperitoneal approach, the retro peritoneum was exposed; the ureter was identified in both sides of the vena cava. The retrocaval segment was entirely mobilized and pulled from behind of the vena cava after section of renal pelvis. A pyelopyelostomy was done in a normal anatomic position. Results. All operations were achieved laparoscopically without conversion to open surgery. The mean operative time was 140 minutes (110–190). No intraoperative complication occurred. Blood loss was less than 50 mL in all patients. The mean hospital stay was 5 days (4–6 days). All patients were symptom-free after surgery and had reduction of hydronephrosis in control imagery. Conclusion. Laparoscopy seems safe, feasible, and reproducible in managing retrocaval ureter. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4923527/ /pubmed/27403160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5709134 Text en Copyright © 2016 Y. El Harrech et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article El Harrech, Y. Ghoundale, O. Kasmaoui, E. H. Touiti, D. Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Pyelopyelostomy for Retrocaval Ureter without Excision of the Retrocaval Segment: Experience on Three Cases |
title | Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Pyelopyelostomy for Retrocaval Ureter without Excision of the Retrocaval Segment: Experience on Three Cases |
title_full | Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Pyelopyelostomy for Retrocaval Ureter without Excision of the Retrocaval Segment: Experience on Three Cases |
title_fullStr | Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Pyelopyelostomy for Retrocaval Ureter without Excision of the Retrocaval Segment: Experience on Three Cases |
title_full_unstemmed | Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Pyelopyelostomy for Retrocaval Ureter without Excision of the Retrocaval Segment: Experience on Three Cases |
title_short | Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Pyelopyelostomy for Retrocaval Ureter without Excision of the Retrocaval Segment: Experience on Three Cases |
title_sort | transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelopyelostomy for retrocaval ureter without excision of the retrocaval segment: experience on three cases |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4923527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27403160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5709134 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elharrechy transperitoneallaparoscopicpyelopyelostomyforretrocavalureterwithoutexcisionoftheretrocavalsegmentexperienceonthreecases AT ghoundaleo transperitoneallaparoscopicpyelopyelostomyforretrocavalureterwithoutexcisionoftheretrocavalsegmentexperienceonthreecases AT kasmaouieh transperitoneallaparoscopicpyelopyelostomyforretrocavalureterwithoutexcisionoftheretrocavalsegmentexperienceonthreecases AT touitid transperitoneallaparoscopicpyelopyelostomyforretrocavalureterwithoutexcisionoftheretrocavalsegmentexperienceonthreecases |