Cargando…

Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Pyelopyelostomy for Retrocaval Ureter without Excision of the Retrocaval Segment: Experience on Three Cases

Introduction. Retrocaval ureter is a rare congenital anomaly. Open surgery was the classic treatment for this condition. Laparoscopy is currently an admitted procedure to treat many urological diseases. The objective of our study is to present our experience and discuss the safety and the feasibilit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El Harrech, Y., Ghoundale, O., Kasmaoui, E. H., Touiti, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4923527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27403160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5709134
_version_ 1782439727540994048
author El Harrech, Y.
Ghoundale, O.
Kasmaoui, E. H.
Touiti, D.
author_facet El Harrech, Y.
Ghoundale, O.
Kasmaoui, E. H.
Touiti, D.
author_sort El Harrech, Y.
collection PubMed
description Introduction. Retrocaval ureter is a rare congenital anomaly. Open surgery was the classic treatment for this condition. Laparoscopy is currently an admitted procedure to treat many urological diseases. The objective of our study is to present our experience and discuss the safety and the feasibility of transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelopyelostomy for treatment of retrocaval ureter (RCU). Materials and Methods. Three symptomatic patients underwent laparoscopic repair for RCU in our department. The diagnosis was suspected on the computed tomography scan (CT) and confirmed on ascending pyelography. After placement of a JJ stent, and, using the transperitoneal approach, the retro peritoneum was exposed; the ureter was identified in both sides of the vena cava. The retrocaval segment was entirely mobilized and pulled from behind of the vena cava after section of renal pelvis. A pyelopyelostomy was done in a normal anatomic position. Results. All operations were achieved laparoscopically without conversion to open surgery. The mean operative time was 140 minutes (110–190). No intraoperative complication occurred. Blood loss was less than 50 mL in all patients. The mean hospital stay was 5 days (4–6 days). All patients were symptom-free after surgery and had reduction of hydronephrosis in control imagery. Conclusion. Laparoscopy seems safe, feasible, and reproducible in managing retrocaval ureter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4923527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49235272016-07-11 Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Pyelopyelostomy for Retrocaval Ureter without Excision of the Retrocaval Segment: Experience on Three Cases El Harrech, Y. Ghoundale, O. Kasmaoui, E. H. Touiti, D. Adv Urol Research Article Introduction. Retrocaval ureter is a rare congenital anomaly. Open surgery was the classic treatment for this condition. Laparoscopy is currently an admitted procedure to treat many urological diseases. The objective of our study is to present our experience and discuss the safety and the feasibility of transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelopyelostomy for treatment of retrocaval ureter (RCU). Materials and Methods. Three symptomatic patients underwent laparoscopic repair for RCU in our department. The diagnosis was suspected on the computed tomography scan (CT) and confirmed on ascending pyelography. After placement of a JJ stent, and, using the transperitoneal approach, the retro peritoneum was exposed; the ureter was identified in both sides of the vena cava. The retrocaval segment was entirely mobilized and pulled from behind of the vena cava after section of renal pelvis. A pyelopyelostomy was done in a normal anatomic position. Results. All operations were achieved laparoscopically without conversion to open surgery. The mean operative time was 140 minutes (110–190). No intraoperative complication occurred. Blood loss was less than 50 mL in all patients. The mean hospital stay was 5 days (4–6 days). All patients were symptom-free after surgery and had reduction of hydronephrosis in control imagery. Conclusion. Laparoscopy seems safe, feasible, and reproducible in managing retrocaval ureter. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4923527/ /pubmed/27403160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5709134 Text en Copyright © 2016 Y. El Harrech et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
El Harrech, Y.
Ghoundale, O.
Kasmaoui, E. H.
Touiti, D.
Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Pyelopyelostomy for Retrocaval Ureter without Excision of the Retrocaval Segment: Experience on Three Cases
title Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Pyelopyelostomy for Retrocaval Ureter without Excision of the Retrocaval Segment: Experience on Three Cases
title_full Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Pyelopyelostomy for Retrocaval Ureter without Excision of the Retrocaval Segment: Experience on Three Cases
title_fullStr Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Pyelopyelostomy for Retrocaval Ureter without Excision of the Retrocaval Segment: Experience on Three Cases
title_full_unstemmed Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Pyelopyelostomy for Retrocaval Ureter without Excision of the Retrocaval Segment: Experience on Three Cases
title_short Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Pyelopyelostomy for Retrocaval Ureter without Excision of the Retrocaval Segment: Experience on Three Cases
title_sort transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelopyelostomy for retrocaval ureter without excision of the retrocaval segment: experience on three cases
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4923527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27403160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5709134
work_keys_str_mv AT elharrechy transperitoneallaparoscopicpyelopyelostomyforretrocavalureterwithoutexcisionoftheretrocavalsegmentexperienceonthreecases
AT ghoundaleo transperitoneallaparoscopicpyelopyelostomyforretrocavalureterwithoutexcisionoftheretrocavalsegmentexperienceonthreecases
AT kasmaouieh transperitoneallaparoscopicpyelopyelostomyforretrocavalureterwithoutexcisionoftheretrocavalsegmentexperienceonthreecases
AT touitid transperitoneallaparoscopicpyelopyelostomyforretrocavalureterwithoutexcisionoftheretrocavalsegmentexperienceonthreecases