Cargando…

Comparison of INTAKE24 (an Online 24-h Dietary Recall Tool) with Interviewer-Led 24-h Recall in 11–24 Year-Old

Online dietary assessment tools offer a convenient, low cost alternative to traditional dietary assessment methods such as weighed records and face-to-face interviewer-led 24-h recalls. INTAKE24 is an online multiple pass 24-h recall tool developed for use with 11–24 year-old. The aim of the study w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bradley, Jennifer, Simpson, Emma, Poliakov, Ivan, Matthews, John N. S., Olivier, Patrick, Adamson, Ashley J., Foster, Emma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4924199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27294952
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu8060358
_version_ 1782439822908981248
author Bradley, Jennifer
Simpson, Emma
Poliakov, Ivan
Matthews, John N. S.
Olivier, Patrick
Adamson, Ashley J.
Foster, Emma
author_facet Bradley, Jennifer
Simpson, Emma
Poliakov, Ivan
Matthews, John N. S.
Olivier, Patrick
Adamson, Ashley J.
Foster, Emma
author_sort Bradley, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description Online dietary assessment tools offer a convenient, low cost alternative to traditional dietary assessment methods such as weighed records and face-to-face interviewer-led 24-h recalls. INTAKE24 is an online multiple pass 24-h recall tool developed for use with 11–24 year-old. The aim of the study was to undertake a comparison of INTAKE24 (the test method) with interviewer-led multiple pass 24-h recalls (the comparison method) in 180 people aged 11–24 years. Each participant completed both an INTAKE24 24-h recall and an interviewer-led 24-h recall on the same day on four occasions over a one-month period. The daily energy and nutrient intakes reported in INTAKE24 were compared to those reported in the interviewer-led recall. Mean intakes reported using INTAKE24 were similar to the intakes reported in the interviewer-led recall for energy and macronutrients. INTAKE24 was found to underestimate energy intake by 1% on average compared to the interviewer-led recall with the limits of agreement ranging from minus 49% to plus 93%. Mean intakes of all macronutrients and micronutrients (except non-milk extrinsic sugars) were within 4% of the interviewer-led recall. Dietary assessment that utilises technology may offer a viable alternative and be more engaging than paper based methods, particularly for children and young adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4924199
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49241992016-07-05 Comparison of INTAKE24 (an Online 24-h Dietary Recall Tool) with Interviewer-Led 24-h Recall in 11–24 Year-Old Bradley, Jennifer Simpson, Emma Poliakov, Ivan Matthews, John N. S. Olivier, Patrick Adamson, Ashley J. Foster, Emma Nutrients Project Report Online dietary assessment tools offer a convenient, low cost alternative to traditional dietary assessment methods such as weighed records and face-to-face interviewer-led 24-h recalls. INTAKE24 is an online multiple pass 24-h recall tool developed for use with 11–24 year-old. The aim of the study was to undertake a comparison of INTAKE24 (the test method) with interviewer-led multiple pass 24-h recalls (the comparison method) in 180 people aged 11–24 years. Each participant completed both an INTAKE24 24-h recall and an interviewer-led 24-h recall on the same day on four occasions over a one-month period. The daily energy and nutrient intakes reported in INTAKE24 were compared to those reported in the interviewer-led recall. Mean intakes reported using INTAKE24 were similar to the intakes reported in the interviewer-led recall for energy and macronutrients. INTAKE24 was found to underestimate energy intake by 1% on average compared to the interviewer-led recall with the limits of agreement ranging from minus 49% to plus 93%. Mean intakes of all macronutrients and micronutrients (except non-milk extrinsic sugars) were within 4% of the interviewer-led recall. Dietary assessment that utilises technology may offer a viable alternative and be more engaging than paper based methods, particularly for children and young adults. MDPI 2016-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4924199/ /pubmed/27294952 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu8060358 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Project Report
Bradley, Jennifer
Simpson, Emma
Poliakov, Ivan
Matthews, John N. S.
Olivier, Patrick
Adamson, Ashley J.
Foster, Emma
Comparison of INTAKE24 (an Online 24-h Dietary Recall Tool) with Interviewer-Led 24-h Recall in 11–24 Year-Old
title Comparison of INTAKE24 (an Online 24-h Dietary Recall Tool) with Interviewer-Led 24-h Recall in 11–24 Year-Old
title_full Comparison of INTAKE24 (an Online 24-h Dietary Recall Tool) with Interviewer-Led 24-h Recall in 11–24 Year-Old
title_fullStr Comparison of INTAKE24 (an Online 24-h Dietary Recall Tool) with Interviewer-Led 24-h Recall in 11–24 Year-Old
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of INTAKE24 (an Online 24-h Dietary Recall Tool) with Interviewer-Led 24-h Recall in 11–24 Year-Old
title_short Comparison of INTAKE24 (an Online 24-h Dietary Recall Tool) with Interviewer-Led 24-h Recall in 11–24 Year-Old
title_sort comparison of intake24 (an online 24-h dietary recall tool) with interviewer-led 24-h recall in 11–24 year-old
topic Project Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4924199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27294952
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu8060358
work_keys_str_mv AT bradleyjennifer comparisonofintake24anonline24hdietaryrecalltoolwithinterviewerled24hrecallin1124yearold
AT simpsonemma comparisonofintake24anonline24hdietaryrecalltoolwithinterviewerled24hrecallin1124yearold
AT poliakovivan comparisonofintake24anonline24hdietaryrecalltoolwithinterviewerled24hrecallin1124yearold
AT matthewsjohnns comparisonofintake24anonline24hdietaryrecalltoolwithinterviewerled24hrecallin1124yearold
AT olivierpatrick comparisonofintake24anonline24hdietaryrecalltoolwithinterviewerled24hrecallin1124yearold
AT adamsonashleyj comparisonofintake24anonline24hdietaryrecalltoolwithinterviewerled24hrecallin1124yearold
AT fosteremma comparisonofintake24anonline24hdietaryrecalltoolwithinterviewerled24hrecallin1124yearold