Cargando…
Comparison of INTAKE24 (an Online 24-h Dietary Recall Tool) with Interviewer-Led 24-h Recall in 11–24 Year-Old
Online dietary assessment tools offer a convenient, low cost alternative to traditional dietary assessment methods such as weighed records and face-to-face interviewer-led 24-h recalls. INTAKE24 is an online multiple pass 24-h recall tool developed for use with 11–24 year-old. The aim of the study w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4924199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27294952 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu8060358 |
_version_ | 1782439822908981248 |
---|---|
author | Bradley, Jennifer Simpson, Emma Poliakov, Ivan Matthews, John N. S. Olivier, Patrick Adamson, Ashley J. Foster, Emma |
author_facet | Bradley, Jennifer Simpson, Emma Poliakov, Ivan Matthews, John N. S. Olivier, Patrick Adamson, Ashley J. Foster, Emma |
author_sort | Bradley, Jennifer |
collection | PubMed |
description | Online dietary assessment tools offer a convenient, low cost alternative to traditional dietary assessment methods such as weighed records and face-to-face interviewer-led 24-h recalls. INTAKE24 is an online multiple pass 24-h recall tool developed for use with 11–24 year-old. The aim of the study was to undertake a comparison of INTAKE24 (the test method) with interviewer-led multiple pass 24-h recalls (the comparison method) in 180 people aged 11–24 years. Each participant completed both an INTAKE24 24-h recall and an interviewer-led 24-h recall on the same day on four occasions over a one-month period. The daily energy and nutrient intakes reported in INTAKE24 were compared to those reported in the interviewer-led recall. Mean intakes reported using INTAKE24 were similar to the intakes reported in the interviewer-led recall for energy and macronutrients. INTAKE24 was found to underestimate energy intake by 1% on average compared to the interviewer-led recall with the limits of agreement ranging from minus 49% to plus 93%. Mean intakes of all macronutrients and micronutrients (except non-milk extrinsic sugars) were within 4% of the interviewer-led recall. Dietary assessment that utilises technology may offer a viable alternative and be more engaging than paper based methods, particularly for children and young adults. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4924199 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49241992016-07-05 Comparison of INTAKE24 (an Online 24-h Dietary Recall Tool) with Interviewer-Led 24-h Recall in 11–24 Year-Old Bradley, Jennifer Simpson, Emma Poliakov, Ivan Matthews, John N. S. Olivier, Patrick Adamson, Ashley J. Foster, Emma Nutrients Project Report Online dietary assessment tools offer a convenient, low cost alternative to traditional dietary assessment methods such as weighed records and face-to-face interviewer-led 24-h recalls. INTAKE24 is an online multiple pass 24-h recall tool developed for use with 11–24 year-old. The aim of the study was to undertake a comparison of INTAKE24 (the test method) with interviewer-led multiple pass 24-h recalls (the comparison method) in 180 people aged 11–24 years. Each participant completed both an INTAKE24 24-h recall and an interviewer-led 24-h recall on the same day on four occasions over a one-month period. The daily energy and nutrient intakes reported in INTAKE24 were compared to those reported in the interviewer-led recall. Mean intakes reported using INTAKE24 were similar to the intakes reported in the interviewer-led recall for energy and macronutrients. INTAKE24 was found to underestimate energy intake by 1% on average compared to the interviewer-led recall with the limits of agreement ranging from minus 49% to plus 93%. Mean intakes of all macronutrients and micronutrients (except non-milk extrinsic sugars) were within 4% of the interviewer-led recall. Dietary assessment that utilises technology may offer a viable alternative and be more engaging than paper based methods, particularly for children and young adults. MDPI 2016-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4924199/ /pubmed/27294952 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu8060358 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Project Report Bradley, Jennifer Simpson, Emma Poliakov, Ivan Matthews, John N. S. Olivier, Patrick Adamson, Ashley J. Foster, Emma Comparison of INTAKE24 (an Online 24-h Dietary Recall Tool) with Interviewer-Led 24-h Recall in 11–24 Year-Old |
title | Comparison of INTAKE24 (an Online 24-h Dietary Recall Tool) with Interviewer-Led 24-h Recall in 11–24 Year-Old |
title_full | Comparison of INTAKE24 (an Online 24-h Dietary Recall Tool) with Interviewer-Led 24-h Recall in 11–24 Year-Old |
title_fullStr | Comparison of INTAKE24 (an Online 24-h Dietary Recall Tool) with Interviewer-Led 24-h Recall in 11–24 Year-Old |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of INTAKE24 (an Online 24-h Dietary Recall Tool) with Interviewer-Led 24-h Recall in 11–24 Year-Old |
title_short | Comparison of INTAKE24 (an Online 24-h Dietary Recall Tool) with Interviewer-Led 24-h Recall in 11–24 Year-Old |
title_sort | comparison of intake24 (an online 24-h dietary recall tool) with interviewer-led 24-h recall in 11–24 year-old |
topic | Project Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4924199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27294952 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu8060358 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bradleyjennifer comparisonofintake24anonline24hdietaryrecalltoolwithinterviewerled24hrecallin1124yearold AT simpsonemma comparisonofintake24anonline24hdietaryrecalltoolwithinterviewerled24hrecallin1124yearold AT poliakovivan comparisonofintake24anonline24hdietaryrecalltoolwithinterviewerled24hrecallin1124yearold AT matthewsjohnns comparisonofintake24anonline24hdietaryrecalltoolwithinterviewerled24hrecallin1124yearold AT olivierpatrick comparisonofintake24anonline24hdietaryrecalltoolwithinterviewerled24hrecallin1124yearold AT adamsonashleyj comparisonofintake24anonline24hdietaryrecalltoolwithinterviewerled24hrecallin1124yearold AT fosteremma comparisonofintake24anonline24hdietaryrecalltoolwithinterviewerled24hrecallin1124yearold |