Cargando…
Variation in population levels of physical activity in European adults according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC
BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity is a well-known public health risk that should be monitored at the population level. Physical activity levels are often surveyed across Europe. This systematic literature review aims to provide an overview of all existing cross-European studies that assess physical ac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4924233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27350359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0398-2 |
_version_ | 1782439830354919424 |
---|---|
author | Loyen, Anne Van Hecke, Linde Verloigne, Maïté Hendriksen, Ingrid Lakerveld, Jeroen Steene-Johannessen, Jostein Vuillemin, Anne Koster, Annemarie Donnelly, Alan Ekelund, Ulf Deforche, Benedicte De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse Brug, Johannes van der Ploeg, Hidde P. |
author_facet | Loyen, Anne Van Hecke, Linde Verloigne, Maïté Hendriksen, Ingrid Lakerveld, Jeroen Steene-Johannessen, Jostein Vuillemin, Anne Koster, Annemarie Donnelly, Alan Ekelund, Ulf Deforche, Benedicte De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse Brug, Johannes van der Ploeg, Hidde P. |
author_sort | Loyen, Anne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity is a well-known public health risk that should be monitored at the population level. Physical activity levels are often surveyed across Europe. This systematic literature review aims to provide an overview of all existing cross-European studies that assess physical activity in European adults, describe the variation in population levels according to these studies, and discuss the impact of the assessment methods. METHODS: Six literature databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SportDiscus and OpenGrey) were searched, supplemented with backward- and forward tracking and searching authors’ and experts’ literature databases. Articles were included if they reported on observational studies measuring total physical activity and/or physical activity in leisure time in the general population in two or more European countries. Each record was reviewed, extracted and assessed by two independent researchers and disagreements were resolved by a third researcher. The review protocol of this review is registered in the PROSPERO database under registration number CRD42014010334. RESULTS: Of the 9,756 unique identified articles, twenty-five were included in this review, reporting on sixteen different studies, including 2 to 35 countries and 321 to 274,740 participants. All but two of the studies used questionnaires to assess physical activity, with the majority of studies using the IPAQ-short questionnaire. The remaining studies used accelerometers. The percentage of participants who either were or were not meeting the physical activity recommendations was the most commonly reported outcome variable, with the percentage of participants meeting the recommendations ranging from 7 % to 96 % across studies and countries. CONCLUSIONS: The included studies showed substantial variation in the assessment methods, reported outcome variables and, consequently, the presented physical activity levels. Because of this, absolute population levels of physical activity in European adults are currently unknown. However, when ranking countries, Ireland, Italy, Malta, Portugal, and Spain generally appear to be among the less active countries. Objective data of adults across Europe is currently limited. These findings highlight the need for standardisation of the measurement methods, as well as cross-European monitoring of physical activity levels. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-016-0398-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4924233 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49242332016-06-29 Variation in population levels of physical activity in European adults according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC Loyen, Anne Van Hecke, Linde Verloigne, Maïté Hendriksen, Ingrid Lakerveld, Jeroen Steene-Johannessen, Jostein Vuillemin, Anne Koster, Annemarie Donnelly, Alan Ekelund, Ulf Deforche, Benedicte De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse Brug, Johannes van der Ploeg, Hidde P. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Review BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity is a well-known public health risk that should be monitored at the population level. Physical activity levels are often surveyed across Europe. This systematic literature review aims to provide an overview of all existing cross-European studies that assess physical activity in European adults, describe the variation in population levels according to these studies, and discuss the impact of the assessment methods. METHODS: Six literature databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SportDiscus and OpenGrey) were searched, supplemented with backward- and forward tracking and searching authors’ and experts’ literature databases. Articles were included if they reported on observational studies measuring total physical activity and/or physical activity in leisure time in the general population in two or more European countries. Each record was reviewed, extracted and assessed by two independent researchers and disagreements were resolved by a third researcher. The review protocol of this review is registered in the PROSPERO database under registration number CRD42014010334. RESULTS: Of the 9,756 unique identified articles, twenty-five were included in this review, reporting on sixteen different studies, including 2 to 35 countries and 321 to 274,740 participants. All but two of the studies used questionnaires to assess physical activity, with the majority of studies using the IPAQ-short questionnaire. The remaining studies used accelerometers. The percentage of participants who either were or were not meeting the physical activity recommendations was the most commonly reported outcome variable, with the percentage of participants meeting the recommendations ranging from 7 % to 96 % across studies and countries. CONCLUSIONS: The included studies showed substantial variation in the assessment methods, reported outcome variables and, consequently, the presented physical activity levels. Because of this, absolute population levels of physical activity in European adults are currently unknown. However, when ranking countries, Ireland, Italy, Malta, Portugal, and Spain generally appear to be among the less active countries. Objective data of adults across Europe is currently limited. These findings highlight the need for standardisation of the measurement methods, as well as cross-European monitoring of physical activity levels. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-016-0398-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4924233/ /pubmed/27350359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0398-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Loyen, Anne Van Hecke, Linde Verloigne, Maïté Hendriksen, Ingrid Lakerveld, Jeroen Steene-Johannessen, Jostein Vuillemin, Anne Koster, Annemarie Donnelly, Alan Ekelund, Ulf Deforche, Benedicte De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse Brug, Johannes van der Ploeg, Hidde P. Variation in population levels of physical activity in European adults according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC |
title | Variation in population levels of physical activity in European adults according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC |
title_full | Variation in population levels of physical activity in European adults according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC |
title_fullStr | Variation in population levels of physical activity in European adults according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC |
title_full_unstemmed | Variation in population levels of physical activity in European adults according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC |
title_short | Variation in population levels of physical activity in European adults according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC |
title_sort | variation in population levels of physical activity in european adults according to cross-european studies: a systematic literature review within dedipac |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4924233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27350359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0398-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loyenanne variationinpopulationlevelsofphysicalactivityineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac AT vanheckelinde variationinpopulationlevelsofphysicalactivityineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac AT verloignemaite variationinpopulationlevelsofphysicalactivityineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac AT hendrikseningrid variationinpopulationlevelsofphysicalactivityineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac AT lakerveldjeroen variationinpopulationlevelsofphysicalactivityineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac AT steenejohannessenjostein variationinpopulationlevelsofphysicalactivityineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac AT vuilleminanne variationinpopulationlevelsofphysicalactivityineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac AT kosterannemarie variationinpopulationlevelsofphysicalactivityineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac AT donnellyalan variationinpopulationlevelsofphysicalactivityineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac AT ekelundulf variationinpopulationlevelsofphysicalactivityineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac AT deforchebenedicte variationinpopulationlevelsofphysicalactivityineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac AT debourdeaudhuijilse variationinpopulationlevelsofphysicalactivityineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac AT brugjohannes variationinpopulationlevelsofphysicalactivityineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac AT vanderploeghiddep variationinpopulationlevelsofphysicalactivityineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac AT variationinpopulationlevelsofphysicalactivityineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac |