Cargando…

Variation in population levels of physical activity in European adults according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC

BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity is a well-known public health risk that should be monitored at the population level. Physical activity levels are often surveyed across Europe. This systematic literature review aims to provide an overview of all existing cross-European studies that assess physical ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loyen, Anne, Van Hecke, Linde, Verloigne, Maïté, Hendriksen, Ingrid, Lakerveld, Jeroen, Steene-Johannessen, Jostein, Vuillemin, Anne, Koster, Annemarie, Donnelly, Alan, Ekelund, Ulf, Deforche, Benedicte, De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse, Brug, Johannes, van der Ploeg, Hidde P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4924233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27350359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0398-2
_version_ 1782439830354919424
author Loyen, Anne
Van Hecke, Linde
Verloigne, Maïté
Hendriksen, Ingrid
Lakerveld, Jeroen
Steene-Johannessen, Jostein
Vuillemin, Anne
Koster, Annemarie
Donnelly, Alan
Ekelund, Ulf
Deforche, Benedicte
De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse
Brug, Johannes
van der Ploeg, Hidde P.
author_facet Loyen, Anne
Van Hecke, Linde
Verloigne, Maïté
Hendriksen, Ingrid
Lakerveld, Jeroen
Steene-Johannessen, Jostein
Vuillemin, Anne
Koster, Annemarie
Donnelly, Alan
Ekelund, Ulf
Deforche, Benedicte
De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse
Brug, Johannes
van der Ploeg, Hidde P.
author_sort Loyen, Anne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity is a well-known public health risk that should be monitored at the population level. Physical activity levels are often surveyed across Europe. This systematic literature review aims to provide an overview of all existing cross-European studies that assess physical activity in European adults, describe the variation in population levels according to these studies, and discuss the impact of the assessment methods. METHODS: Six literature databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SportDiscus and OpenGrey) were searched, supplemented with backward- and forward tracking and searching authors’ and experts’ literature databases. Articles were included if they reported on observational studies measuring total physical activity and/or physical activity in leisure time in the general population in two or more European countries. Each record was reviewed, extracted and assessed by two independent researchers and disagreements were resolved by a third researcher. The review protocol of this review is registered in the PROSPERO database under registration number CRD42014010334. RESULTS: Of the 9,756 unique identified articles, twenty-five were included in this review, reporting on sixteen different studies, including 2 to 35 countries and 321 to 274,740 participants. All but two of the studies used questionnaires to assess physical activity, with the majority of studies using the IPAQ-short questionnaire. The remaining studies used accelerometers. The percentage of participants who either were or were not meeting the physical activity recommendations was the most commonly reported outcome variable, with the percentage of participants meeting the recommendations ranging from 7 % to 96 % across studies and countries. CONCLUSIONS: The included studies showed substantial variation in the assessment methods, reported outcome variables and, consequently, the presented physical activity levels. Because of this, absolute population levels of physical activity in European adults are currently unknown. However, when ranking countries, Ireland, Italy, Malta, Portugal, and Spain generally appear to be among the less active countries. Objective data of adults across Europe is currently limited. These findings highlight the need for standardisation of the measurement methods, as well as cross-European monitoring of physical activity levels. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-016-0398-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4924233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49242332016-06-29 Variation in population levels of physical activity in European adults according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC Loyen, Anne Van Hecke, Linde Verloigne, Maïté Hendriksen, Ingrid Lakerveld, Jeroen Steene-Johannessen, Jostein Vuillemin, Anne Koster, Annemarie Donnelly, Alan Ekelund, Ulf Deforche, Benedicte De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse Brug, Johannes van der Ploeg, Hidde P. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Review BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity is a well-known public health risk that should be monitored at the population level. Physical activity levels are often surveyed across Europe. This systematic literature review aims to provide an overview of all existing cross-European studies that assess physical activity in European adults, describe the variation in population levels according to these studies, and discuss the impact of the assessment methods. METHODS: Six literature databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SportDiscus and OpenGrey) were searched, supplemented with backward- and forward tracking and searching authors’ and experts’ literature databases. Articles were included if they reported on observational studies measuring total physical activity and/or physical activity in leisure time in the general population in two or more European countries. Each record was reviewed, extracted and assessed by two independent researchers and disagreements were resolved by a third researcher. The review protocol of this review is registered in the PROSPERO database under registration number CRD42014010334. RESULTS: Of the 9,756 unique identified articles, twenty-five were included in this review, reporting on sixteen different studies, including 2 to 35 countries and 321 to 274,740 participants. All but two of the studies used questionnaires to assess physical activity, with the majority of studies using the IPAQ-short questionnaire. The remaining studies used accelerometers. The percentage of participants who either were or were not meeting the physical activity recommendations was the most commonly reported outcome variable, with the percentage of participants meeting the recommendations ranging from 7 % to 96 % across studies and countries. CONCLUSIONS: The included studies showed substantial variation in the assessment methods, reported outcome variables and, consequently, the presented physical activity levels. Because of this, absolute population levels of physical activity in European adults are currently unknown. However, when ranking countries, Ireland, Italy, Malta, Portugal, and Spain generally appear to be among the less active countries. Objective data of adults across Europe is currently limited. These findings highlight the need for standardisation of the measurement methods, as well as cross-European monitoring of physical activity levels. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-016-0398-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4924233/ /pubmed/27350359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0398-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Loyen, Anne
Van Hecke, Linde
Verloigne, Maïté
Hendriksen, Ingrid
Lakerveld, Jeroen
Steene-Johannessen, Jostein
Vuillemin, Anne
Koster, Annemarie
Donnelly, Alan
Ekelund, Ulf
Deforche, Benedicte
De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse
Brug, Johannes
van der Ploeg, Hidde P.
Variation in population levels of physical activity in European adults according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC
title Variation in population levels of physical activity in European adults according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC
title_full Variation in population levels of physical activity in European adults according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC
title_fullStr Variation in population levels of physical activity in European adults according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC
title_full_unstemmed Variation in population levels of physical activity in European adults according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC
title_short Variation in population levels of physical activity in European adults according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC
title_sort variation in population levels of physical activity in european adults according to cross-european studies: a systematic literature review within dedipac
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4924233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27350359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0398-2
work_keys_str_mv AT loyenanne variationinpopulationlevelsofphysicalactivityineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT vanheckelinde variationinpopulationlevelsofphysicalactivityineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT verloignemaite variationinpopulationlevelsofphysicalactivityineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT hendrikseningrid variationinpopulationlevelsofphysicalactivityineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT lakerveldjeroen variationinpopulationlevelsofphysicalactivityineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT steenejohannessenjostein variationinpopulationlevelsofphysicalactivityineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT vuilleminanne variationinpopulationlevelsofphysicalactivityineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT kosterannemarie variationinpopulationlevelsofphysicalactivityineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT donnellyalan variationinpopulationlevelsofphysicalactivityineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT ekelundulf variationinpopulationlevelsofphysicalactivityineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT deforchebenedicte variationinpopulationlevelsofphysicalactivityineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT debourdeaudhuijilse variationinpopulationlevelsofphysicalactivityineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT brugjohannes variationinpopulationlevelsofphysicalactivityineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT vanderploeghiddep variationinpopulationlevelsofphysicalactivityineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT variationinpopulationlevelsofphysicalactivityineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac