Cargando…

Variation in population levels of sedentary time in European adults according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC

BACKGROUND: Sedentary behaviour is increasingly recognized as a public health risk that needs to be monitored at the population level. Across Europe, there is increasing interest in assessing population levels of sedentary time. This systematic literature review aims to provide an overview of all ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loyen, Anne, Verloigne, Maïté, Van Hecke, Linde, Hendriksen, Ingrid, Lakerveld, Jeroen, Steene-Johannessen, Jostein, Koster, Annemarie, Donnelly, Alan, Ekelund, Ulf, Deforche, Benedicte, De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse, Brug, Johannes, van der Ploeg, Hidde P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4924266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27350251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0397-3
_version_ 1782439838132207616
author Loyen, Anne
Verloigne, Maïté
Van Hecke, Linde
Hendriksen, Ingrid
Lakerveld, Jeroen
Steene-Johannessen, Jostein
Koster, Annemarie
Donnelly, Alan
Ekelund, Ulf
Deforche, Benedicte
De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse
Brug, Johannes
van der Ploeg, Hidde P.
author_facet Loyen, Anne
Verloigne, Maïté
Van Hecke, Linde
Hendriksen, Ingrid
Lakerveld, Jeroen
Steene-Johannessen, Jostein
Koster, Annemarie
Donnelly, Alan
Ekelund, Ulf
Deforche, Benedicte
De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse
Brug, Johannes
van der Ploeg, Hidde P.
author_sort Loyen, Anne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sedentary behaviour is increasingly recognized as a public health risk that needs to be monitored at the population level. Across Europe, there is increasing interest in assessing population levels of sedentary time. This systematic literature review aims to provide an overview of all existing cross-European studies that measure sedentary time in adults, to describe the variation in population levels across these studies and to discuss the impact of assessment methods. METHODS: Six literature databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SportDiscus and OpenGrey) were searched, supplemented with backward- and forward tracking and searching authors’ and experts’ literature databases. Articles were included if they reported on observational studies measuring any form of sedentary time in the general population in two or more European countries. Each record was reviewed, extracted and assessed by two independent researchers, and disagreements were resolved by a third researcher. The review protocol of this review is registered in the PROSPERO database under registration number CRD42014010335. RESULTS: Of the 9,756 unique articles that were identified in the search, twelve articles were eligible for inclusion in this review, reporting on six individual studies and three Eurobarometer surveys. These studies represented 2 to 29 countries, and 321 to 65,790 participants. Eleven studies focused on total sedentary time, while one studied screen time. The majority of studies used questionnaires to assess sedentary time, while two studies used accelerometers. Total sedentary time was reported most frequently and varied from 150 (median) to 620 (mean) minutes per day across studies and countries. CONCLUSIONS: One third of European countries were not included in any of the studies. Objective measures of European adults are currently limited, and most studies used single-item self-reported questions without assessing sedentary behaviour types or domains. Findings varied substantially between studies, meaning that population levels of sedentary time in European adults are currently unknown. In general, people living in northern Europe countries appear to report more sedentary time than southern Europeans. The findings of this review highlight the need for standardisation of the measurement methods and the added value of cross-European surveillance of sedentary behaviour. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-016-0397-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4924266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49242662016-06-29 Variation in population levels of sedentary time in European adults according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC Loyen, Anne Verloigne, Maïté Van Hecke, Linde Hendriksen, Ingrid Lakerveld, Jeroen Steene-Johannessen, Jostein Koster, Annemarie Donnelly, Alan Ekelund, Ulf Deforche, Benedicte De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse Brug, Johannes van der Ploeg, Hidde P. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Review BACKGROUND: Sedentary behaviour is increasingly recognized as a public health risk that needs to be monitored at the population level. Across Europe, there is increasing interest in assessing population levels of sedentary time. This systematic literature review aims to provide an overview of all existing cross-European studies that measure sedentary time in adults, to describe the variation in population levels across these studies and to discuss the impact of assessment methods. METHODS: Six literature databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SportDiscus and OpenGrey) were searched, supplemented with backward- and forward tracking and searching authors’ and experts’ literature databases. Articles were included if they reported on observational studies measuring any form of sedentary time in the general population in two or more European countries. Each record was reviewed, extracted and assessed by two independent researchers, and disagreements were resolved by a third researcher. The review protocol of this review is registered in the PROSPERO database under registration number CRD42014010335. RESULTS: Of the 9,756 unique articles that were identified in the search, twelve articles were eligible for inclusion in this review, reporting on six individual studies and three Eurobarometer surveys. These studies represented 2 to 29 countries, and 321 to 65,790 participants. Eleven studies focused on total sedentary time, while one studied screen time. The majority of studies used questionnaires to assess sedentary time, while two studies used accelerometers. Total sedentary time was reported most frequently and varied from 150 (median) to 620 (mean) minutes per day across studies and countries. CONCLUSIONS: One third of European countries were not included in any of the studies. Objective measures of European adults are currently limited, and most studies used single-item self-reported questions without assessing sedentary behaviour types or domains. Findings varied substantially between studies, meaning that population levels of sedentary time in European adults are currently unknown. In general, people living in northern Europe countries appear to report more sedentary time than southern Europeans. The findings of this review highlight the need for standardisation of the measurement methods and the added value of cross-European surveillance of sedentary behaviour. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-016-0397-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4924266/ /pubmed/27350251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0397-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Loyen, Anne
Verloigne, Maïté
Van Hecke, Linde
Hendriksen, Ingrid
Lakerveld, Jeroen
Steene-Johannessen, Jostein
Koster, Annemarie
Donnelly, Alan
Ekelund, Ulf
Deforche, Benedicte
De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse
Brug, Johannes
van der Ploeg, Hidde P.
Variation in population levels of sedentary time in European adults according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC
title Variation in population levels of sedentary time in European adults according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC
title_full Variation in population levels of sedentary time in European adults according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC
title_fullStr Variation in population levels of sedentary time in European adults according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC
title_full_unstemmed Variation in population levels of sedentary time in European adults according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC
title_short Variation in population levels of sedentary time in European adults according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC
title_sort variation in population levels of sedentary time in european adults according to cross-european studies: a systematic literature review within dedipac
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4924266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27350251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0397-3
work_keys_str_mv AT loyenanne variationinpopulationlevelsofsedentarytimeineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT verloignemaite variationinpopulationlevelsofsedentarytimeineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT vanheckelinde variationinpopulationlevelsofsedentarytimeineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT hendrikseningrid variationinpopulationlevelsofsedentarytimeineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT lakerveldjeroen variationinpopulationlevelsofsedentarytimeineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT steenejohannessenjostein variationinpopulationlevelsofsedentarytimeineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT kosterannemarie variationinpopulationlevelsofsedentarytimeineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT donnellyalan variationinpopulationlevelsofsedentarytimeineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT ekelundulf variationinpopulationlevelsofsedentarytimeineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT deforchebenedicte variationinpopulationlevelsofsedentarytimeineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT debourdeaudhuijilse variationinpopulationlevelsofsedentarytimeineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT brugjohannes variationinpopulationlevelsofsedentarytimeineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT vanderploeghiddep variationinpopulationlevelsofsedentarytimeineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT variationinpopulationlevelsofsedentarytimeineuropeanadultsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac