Cargando…

Variation in population levels of sedentary time in European children and adolescents according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC

BACKGROUND: A high amount of sedentary time has been proposed as a risk factor for various health outcomes in adults. While the evidence is less clear in children and adolescents, monitoring sedentary time is important to understand the prevalence rates and how this behaviour varies over time and by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verloigne, Maïté, Loyen, Anne, Van Hecke, Linde, Lakerveld, Jeroen, Hendriksen, Ingrid, De Bourdheaudhuij, Ilse, Deforche, Benedicte, Donnelly, Alan, Ekelund, Ulf, Brug, Johannes, van der Ploeg, Hidde P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4924322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27350043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0395-5
_version_ 1782439851299176448
author Verloigne, Maïté
Loyen, Anne
Van Hecke, Linde
Lakerveld, Jeroen
Hendriksen, Ingrid
De Bourdheaudhuij, Ilse
Deforche, Benedicte
Donnelly, Alan
Ekelund, Ulf
Brug, Johannes
van der Ploeg, Hidde P.
author_facet Verloigne, Maïté
Loyen, Anne
Van Hecke, Linde
Lakerveld, Jeroen
Hendriksen, Ingrid
De Bourdheaudhuij, Ilse
Deforche, Benedicte
Donnelly, Alan
Ekelund, Ulf
Brug, Johannes
van der Ploeg, Hidde P.
author_sort Verloigne, Maïté
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A high amount of sedentary time has been proposed as a risk factor for various health outcomes in adults. While the evidence is less clear in children and adolescents, monitoring sedentary time is important to understand the prevalence rates and how this behaviour varies over time and by place. This systematic literature review aims to provide an overview of existing cross-European studies on sedentary time in children (0-12y) and adolescents (13-18y), to describe the variation in population levels of sedentary time, and to discuss the impact of assessment methods. METHODS: Six literature databases were searched (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SportDiscus and OpenGrey), followed by backward- and forward tracking and searching authors’ and experts’ literature databases. Included articles were observational studies reporting on levels of sedentary time in the general population of children and/or adolescents in at least two European countries. Population levels were reported separately for children and adolescents. Data were reviewed, extracted and assessed by two researchers, with disagreements being resolved by a third researcher. The review protocol is published under registration number CRD42014013379 in the PROSPERO database. RESULTS: Forty-two eligible articles were identified, most were cross-sectional (n = 38). The number of included European countries per article ranged from 2 to 36. Levels of sedentary time were observed to be higher in East-European countries compared to the rest of Europe. There was a large variation in assessment methods and reported outcome variables. The majority of articles used a child-specific questionnaire (60 %). Other methods included accelerometers, parental questionnaires or interviews and ecological momentary assessment tools. Television time was reported as outcome variable in 57 % of included articles (ranging from a mean value of 1 h to 2.7 h in children and 1.3 h to 4.4 h in adolescents), total sedentary time in 24 % (ranging from a mean value of 192 min to 552 min in children and from 268 min to 506 min in adolescents). CONCLUSION: A substantial number of published studies report on levels of sedentary time in children and adolescents across European countries, but there was a large variation in assessment methods. Questionnaires (child specific) were used most often, but they mostly measured specific screen-based activities and did not assess total sedentary time. There is a need for harmonisation and standardisation of objective and subjective methods to assess sedentary time in children and adolescents to enable comparison across countries. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-016-0395-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4924322
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49243222016-06-29 Variation in population levels of sedentary time in European children and adolescents according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC Verloigne, Maïté Loyen, Anne Van Hecke, Linde Lakerveld, Jeroen Hendriksen, Ingrid De Bourdheaudhuij, Ilse Deforche, Benedicte Donnelly, Alan Ekelund, Ulf Brug, Johannes van der Ploeg, Hidde P. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Review BACKGROUND: A high amount of sedentary time has been proposed as a risk factor for various health outcomes in adults. While the evidence is less clear in children and adolescents, monitoring sedentary time is important to understand the prevalence rates and how this behaviour varies over time and by place. This systematic literature review aims to provide an overview of existing cross-European studies on sedentary time in children (0-12y) and adolescents (13-18y), to describe the variation in population levels of sedentary time, and to discuss the impact of assessment methods. METHODS: Six literature databases were searched (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SportDiscus and OpenGrey), followed by backward- and forward tracking and searching authors’ and experts’ literature databases. Included articles were observational studies reporting on levels of sedentary time in the general population of children and/or adolescents in at least two European countries. Population levels were reported separately for children and adolescents. Data were reviewed, extracted and assessed by two researchers, with disagreements being resolved by a third researcher. The review protocol is published under registration number CRD42014013379 in the PROSPERO database. RESULTS: Forty-two eligible articles were identified, most were cross-sectional (n = 38). The number of included European countries per article ranged from 2 to 36. Levels of sedentary time were observed to be higher in East-European countries compared to the rest of Europe. There was a large variation in assessment methods and reported outcome variables. The majority of articles used a child-specific questionnaire (60 %). Other methods included accelerometers, parental questionnaires or interviews and ecological momentary assessment tools. Television time was reported as outcome variable in 57 % of included articles (ranging from a mean value of 1 h to 2.7 h in children and 1.3 h to 4.4 h in adolescents), total sedentary time in 24 % (ranging from a mean value of 192 min to 552 min in children and from 268 min to 506 min in adolescents). CONCLUSION: A substantial number of published studies report on levels of sedentary time in children and adolescents across European countries, but there was a large variation in assessment methods. Questionnaires (child specific) were used most often, but they mostly measured specific screen-based activities and did not assess total sedentary time. There is a need for harmonisation and standardisation of objective and subjective methods to assess sedentary time in children and adolescents to enable comparison across countries. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-016-0395-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4924322/ /pubmed/27350043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0395-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Verloigne, Maïté
Loyen, Anne
Van Hecke, Linde
Lakerveld, Jeroen
Hendriksen, Ingrid
De Bourdheaudhuij, Ilse
Deforche, Benedicte
Donnelly, Alan
Ekelund, Ulf
Brug, Johannes
van der Ploeg, Hidde P.
Variation in population levels of sedentary time in European children and adolescents according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC
title Variation in population levels of sedentary time in European children and adolescents according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC
title_full Variation in population levels of sedentary time in European children and adolescents according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC
title_fullStr Variation in population levels of sedentary time in European children and adolescents according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC
title_full_unstemmed Variation in population levels of sedentary time in European children and adolescents according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC
title_short Variation in population levels of sedentary time in European children and adolescents according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC
title_sort variation in population levels of sedentary time in european children and adolescents according to cross-european studies: a systematic literature review within dedipac
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4924322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27350043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0395-5
work_keys_str_mv AT verloignemaite variationinpopulationlevelsofsedentarytimeineuropeanchildrenandadolescentsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT loyenanne variationinpopulationlevelsofsedentarytimeineuropeanchildrenandadolescentsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT vanheckelinde variationinpopulationlevelsofsedentarytimeineuropeanchildrenandadolescentsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT lakerveldjeroen variationinpopulationlevelsofsedentarytimeineuropeanchildrenandadolescentsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT hendrikseningrid variationinpopulationlevelsofsedentarytimeineuropeanchildrenandadolescentsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT debourdheaudhuijilse variationinpopulationlevelsofsedentarytimeineuropeanchildrenandadolescentsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT deforchebenedicte variationinpopulationlevelsofsedentarytimeineuropeanchildrenandadolescentsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT donnellyalan variationinpopulationlevelsofsedentarytimeineuropeanchildrenandadolescentsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT ekelundulf variationinpopulationlevelsofsedentarytimeineuropeanchildrenandadolescentsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT brugjohannes variationinpopulationlevelsofsedentarytimeineuropeanchildrenandadolescentsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac
AT vanderploeghiddep variationinpopulationlevelsofsedentarytimeineuropeanchildrenandadolescentsaccordingtocrosseuropeanstudiesasystematicliteraturereviewwithindedipac