Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and beyond: the need to improve real-time feedback and physiologic monitoring

High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been shown to improve survival outcomes after cardiac arrest. The current standard in studies evaluating CPR quality is to measure CPR process measures—for example, chest compression rate, depth, and fraction. Published studies evaluating CPR feed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Steve, Scales, Damon C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Commentary
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4924329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27349642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1371-9
_version_ 1782439852929712128
author Lin, Steve
Scales, Damon C.
author_facet Lin, Steve
Scales, Damon C.
author_sort Lin, Steve
collection PubMed
description High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been shown to improve survival outcomes after cardiac arrest. The current standard in studies evaluating CPR quality is to measure CPR process measures—for example, chest compression rate, depth, and fraction. Published studies evaluating CPR feedback devices have yielded mixed results. Newer approaches that seek to optimize CPR by measuring physiological endpoints during the resuscitation may lead to individualized patient care and improved patient outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4924329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49243292016-06-29 Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and beyond: the need to improve real-time feedback and physiologic monitoring Lin, Steve Scales, Damon C. Crit Care Commentary High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been shown to improve survival outcomes after cardiac arrest. The current standard in studies evaluating CPR quality is to measure CPR process measures—for example, chest compression rate, depth, and fraction. Published studies evaluating CPR feedback devices have yielded mixed results. Newer approaches that seek to optimize CPR by measuring physiological endpoints during the resuscitation may lead to individualized patient care and improved patient outcomes. BioMed Central 2016-06-28 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4924329/ /pubmed/27349642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1371-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
Lin, Steve
Scales, Damon C.
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and beyond: the need to improve real-time feedback and physiologic monitoring
title Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and beyond: the need to improve real-time feedback and physiologic monitoring
title_full Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and beyond: the need to improve real-time feedback and physiologic monitoring
title_fullStr Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and beyond: the need to improve real-time feedback and physiologic monitoring
title_full_unstemmed Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and beyond: the need to improve real-time feedback and physiologic monitoring
title_short Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and beyond: the need to improve real-time feedback and physiologic monitoring
title_sort cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and beyond: the need to improve real-time feedback and physiologic monitoring
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4924329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27349642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1371-9
work_keys_str_mv AT linsteve cardiopulmonaryresuscitationqualityandbeyondtheneedtoimproverealtimefeedbackandphysiologicmonitoring
AT scalesdamonc cardiopulmonaryresuscitationqualityandbeyondtheneedtoimproverealtimefeedbackandphysiologicmonitoring

Ejemplares similares