Cargando…

Risk of breast cancer after false‐positive results in mammographic screening

Women with false‐positive results are commonly referred back to routine screening. Questions remain regarding their long‐term outcome of breast cancer. We assessed the risk of screen‐detected breast cancer in women with false‐positive results. We conducted a joint analysis using individual level dat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Román, Marta, Castells, Xavier, Hofvind, Solveig, von Euler‐Chelpin, My
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4924388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26916154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.646
_version_ 1782439864987287552
author Román, Marta
Castells, Xavier
Hofvind, Solveig
von Euler‐Chelpin, My
author_facet Román, Marta
Castells, Xavier
Hofvind, Solveig
von Euler‐Chelpin, My
author_sort Román, Marta
collection PubMed
description Women with false‐positive results are commonly referred back to routine screening. Questions remain regarding their long‐term outcome of breast cancer. We assessed the risk of screen‐detected breast cancer in women with false‐positive results. We conducted a joint analysis using individual level data from the population‐based screening programs in Copenhagen and Funen in Denmark, Norway, and Spain. Overall, 150,383 screened women from Denmark (1991–2008), 612,138 from Norway (1996–2010), and 1,172,572 from Spain (1990–2006) were included. Poisson regression was used to estimate the relative risk (RR) of screen‐detected cancer for women with false‐positive versus negative results. We analyzed information from 1,935,093 women 50–69 years who underwent 6,094,515 screening exams. During an average 5.8 years of follow‐up, 230,609 (11.9%) women received a false‐positive result and 27,849 (1.4%) were diagnosed with screen‐detected cancer. The adjusted RR of screen‐detected cancer after a false‐positive result was 2.01 (95% CI: 1.93–2.09). Women who tested false‐positive at first screen had a RR of 1.86 (95% CI: 1.77–1.96), whereas those who tested false‐positive at third screening had a RR of 2.42 (95% CI: 2.21–2.64). The RR of breast cancer at the screening test after the false‐positive result was 3.95 (95% CI: 3.71–4.21), whereas it decreased to 1.25 (95% CI: 1.17–1.34) three or more screens after the false‐positive result. Women with false‐positive results had a twofold risk of screen‐detected breast cancer compared to women with negative tests. The risk remained significantly higher three or more screens after the false‐positive result. The increased risk should be considered when discussing stratified screening strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4924388
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49243882016-06-29 Risk of breast cancer after false‐positive results in mammographic screening Román, Marta Castells, Xavier Hofvind, Solveig von Euler‐Chelpin, My Cancer Med Cancer Biology Women with false‐positive results are commonly referred back to routine screening. Questions remain regarding their long‐term outcome of breast cancer. We assessed the risk of screen‐detected breast cancer in women with false‐positive results. We conducted a joint analysis using individual level data from the population‐based screening programs in Copenhagen and Funen in Denmark, Norway, and Spain. Overall, 150,383 screened women from Denmark (1991–2008), 612,138 from Norway (1996–2010), and 1,172,572 from Spain (1990–2006) were included. Poisson regression was used to estimate the relative risk (RR) of screen‐detected cancer for women with false‐positive versus negative results. We analyzed information from 1,935,093 women 50–69 years who underwent 6,094,515 screening exams. During an average 5.8 years of follow‐up, 230,609 (11.9%) women received a false‐positive result and 27,849 (1.4%) were diagnosed with screen‐detected cancer. The adjusted RR of screen‐detected cancer after a false‐positive result was 2.01 (95% CI: 1.93–2.09). Women who tested false‐positive at first screen had a RR of 1.86 (95% CI: 1.77–1.96), whereas those who tested false‐positive at third screening had a RR of 2.42 (95% CI: 2.21–2.64). The RR of breast cancer at the screening test after the false‐positive result was 3.95 (95% CI: 3.71–4.21), whereas it decreased to 1.25 (95% CI: 1.17–1.34) three or more screens after the false‐positive result. Women with false‐positive results had a twofold risk of screen‐detected breast cancer compared to women with negative tests. The risk remained significantly higher three or more screens after the false‐positive result. The increased risk should be considered when discussing stratified screening strategies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4924388/ /pubmed/26916154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.646 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cancer Biology
Román, Marta
Castells, Xavier
Hofvind, Solveig
von Euler‐Chelpin, My
Risk of breast cancer after false‐positive results in mammographic screening
title Risk of breast cancer after false‐positive results in mammographic screening
title_full Risk of breast cancer after false‐positive results in mammographic screening
title_fullStr Risk of breast cancer after false‐positive results in mammographic screening
title_full_unstemmed Risk of breast cancer after false‐positive results in mammographic screening
title_short Risk of breast cancer after false‐positive results in mammographic screening
title_sort risk of breast cancer after false‐positive results in mammographic screening
topic Cancer Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4924388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26916154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.646
work_keys_str_mv AT romanmarta riskofbreastcancerafterfalsepositiveresultsinmammographicscreening
AT castellsxavier riskofbreastcancerafterfalsepositiveresultsinmammographicscreening
AT hofvindsolveig riskofbreastcancerafterfalsepositiveresultsinmammographicscreening
AT voneulerchelpinmy riskofbreastcancerafterfalsepositiveresultsinmammographicscreening