Cargando…

The changes of radiotherapy in Lithuania: infrastructure, utilization rate, and cost

Background. The aim of this study was to evaluate radiation therapy (RT) productivity, capacity, and cost in Lithuania. Materials and methods. An electronic questionnaire was prepared and sent to the country’s RT centres. The data was collected for the years 2011–2014. The early data of the RT infra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mineikytė, Ramunė, Janulionis, Ernestas, Atkočius, Vydmantas, Jaruševičius, Laimonas, Plieskienė, Aista, Gečas, Jonas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lithuanian Academy of Sciences Publishers 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4924636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28356788
http://dx.doi.org/10.6001/actamedica.v23i1.3266
_version_ 1782439890369118208
author Mineikytė, Ramunė
Janulionis, Ernestas
Atkočius, Vydmantas
Jaruševičius, Laimonas
Plieskienė, Aista
Gečas, Jonas
author_facet Mineikytė, Ramunė
Janulionis, Ernestas
Atkočius, Vydmantas
Jaruševičius, Laimonas
Plieskienė, Aista
Gečas, Jonas
author_sort Mineikytė, Ramunė
collection PubMed
description Background. The aim of this study was to evaluate radiation therapy (RT) productivity, capacity, and cost in Lithuania. Materials and methods. An electronic questionnaire was prepared and sent to the country’s RT centres. The data was collected for the years 2011–2014. The early data of the RT infrastructure was obtained from the QUARTS Project (2001). Results. In Lithuania the external beam RT was applied to 32.6% of new cancer cases (non-melanomatous skin cancer and benign conditions were excluded). In 2014, RT was more frequently applied for breast and prostate carcinomas, 23 and 20%, respectively. The country owned 11 units of linear accelerators (linacs) and this accounts for 3.7 linacs per one million population. 3D conformal RT is the standard approach in all four RT centres in Lithuania. IMRT practices were established in three centers and VMAT or stereotactic RT in two of them. 73% of linacs were capable of IGRT, while only 27% were equipped with CBCT. The average linac workload was 567 patients per year and showed a 10% decrease compared with the 2011 data. During a ten-year period, the average cost per patient for RT treatment increased 7.6 times – from EUR 129 to 974. The reimbursement system in Lithuania is not favourable for application of RT. Conclusions. During the recent thirteen years, RT services in Lithuania have dramatically improved, but we are still behind the average of European countries and benchmark rates. It is important to continue optimising the efficiency of RT services, and further evidence-based studies on RT infrastructure assessment and planning are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4924636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Lithuanian Academy of Sciences Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49246362017-03-29 The changes of radiotherapy in Lithuania: infrastructure, utilization rate, and cost Mineikytė, Ramunė Janulionis, Ernestas Atkočius, Vydmantas Jaruševičius, Laimonas Plieskienė, Aista Gečas, Jonas Acta Med Litu Research Article Background. The aim of this study was to evaluate radiation therapy (RT) productivity, capacity, and cost in Lithuania. Materials and methods. An electronic questionnaire was prepared and sent to the country’s RT centres. The data was collected for the years 2011–2014. The early data of the RT infrastructure was obtained from the QUARTS Project (2001). Results. In Lithuania the external beam RT was applied to 32.6% of new cancer cases (non-melanomatous skin cancer and benign conditions were excluded). In 2014, RT was more frequently applied for breast and prostate carcinomas, 23 and 20%, respectively. The country owned 11 units of linear accelerators (linacs) and this accounts for 3.7 linacs per one million population. 3D conformal RT is the standard approach in all four RT centres in Lithuania. IMRT practices were established in three centers and VMAT or stereotactic RT in two of them. 73% of linacs were capable of IGRT, while only 27% were equipped with CBCT. The average linac workload was 567 patients per year and showed a 10% decrease compared with the 2011 data. During a ten-year period, the average cost per patient for RT treatment increased 7.6 times – from EUR 129 to 974. The reimbursement system in Lithuania is not favourable for application of RT. Conclusions. During the recent thirteen years, RT services in Lithuania have dramatically improved, but we are still behind the average of European countries and benchmark rates. It is important to continue optimising the efficiency of RT services, and further evidence-based studies on RT infrastructure assessment and planning are needed. Lithuanian Academy of Sciences Publishers 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4924636/ /pubmed/28356788 http://dx.doi.org/10.6001/actamedica.v23i1.3266 Text en © Lietuvos mokslų akademija, 2016
spellingShingle Research Article
Mineikytė, Ramunė
Janulionis, Ernestas
Atkočius, Vydmantas
Jaruševičius, Laimonas
Plieskienė, Aista
Gečas, Jonas
The changes of radiotherapy in Lithuania: infrastructure, utilization rate, and cost
title The changes of radiotherapy in Lithuania: infrastructure, utilization rate, and cost
title_full The changes of radiotherapy in Lithuania: infrastructure, utilization rate, and cost
title_fullStr The changes of radiotherapy in Lithuania: infrastructure, utilization rate, and cost
title_full_unstemmed The changes of radiotherapy in Lithuania: infrastructure, utilization rate, and cost
title_short The changes of radiotherapy in Lithuania: infrastructure, utilization rate, and cost
title_sort changes of radiotherapy in lithuania: infrastructure, utilization rate, and cost
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4924636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28356788
http://dx.doi.org/10.6001/actamedica.v23i1.3266
work_keys_str_mv AT mineikyteramune thechangesofradiotherapyinlithuaniainfrastructureutilizationrateandcost
AT janulionisernestas thechangesofradiotherapyinlithuaniainfrastructureutilizationrateandcost
AT atkociusvydmantas thechangesofradiotherapyinlithuaniainfrastructureutilizationrateandcost
AT jaruseviciuslaimonas thechangesofradiotherapyinlithuaniainfrastructureutilizationrateandcost
AT plieskieneaista thechangesofradiotherapyinlithuaniainfrastructureutilizationrateandcost
AT gecasjonas thechangesofradiotherapyinlithuaniainfrastructureutilizationrateandcost
AT mineikyteramune changesofradiotherapyinlithuaniainfrastructureutilizationrateandcost
AT janulionisernestas changesofradiotherapyinlithuaniainfrastructureutilizationrateandcost
AT atkociusvydmantas changesofradiotherapyinlithuaniainfrastructureutilizationrateandcost
AT jaruseviciuslaimonas changesofradiotherapyinlithuaniainfrastructureutilizationrateandcost
AT plieskieneaista changesofradiotherapyinlithuaniainfrastructureutilizationrateandcost
AT gecasjonas changesofradiotherapyinlithuaniainfrastructureutilizationrateandcost