Cargando…

Abducens Nerve in Patients with Type 3 Duane’s Retraction Syndrome

BACKGROUND: We have previously reported that the presence of the abducens nerve was variable in patients with type 3 Duane’s retraction syndrome (DRS), being present in 2 of 5 eyes (40%) and absent in 3 (60%) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The previous study included only 5 eyes with unilatera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Hee Kyung, Kim, Jae Hyoung, Hwang, Jeong-Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4924812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27352171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150670
_version_ 1782439929009143808
author Yang, Hee Kyung
Kim, Jae Hyoung
Hwang, Jeong-Min
author_facet Yang, Hee Kyung
Kim, Jae Hyoung
Hwang, Jeong-Min
author_sort Yang, Hee Kyung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We have previously reported that the presence of the abducens nerve was variable in patients with type 3 Duane’s retraction syndrome (DRS), being present in 2 of 5 eyes (40%) and absent in 3 (60%) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The previous study included only 5 eyes with unilateral DRS type 3. OBJECTIVES: To supplement existing scarce pathologic information by evaluating the presence of the abducens nerve using high resolution thin-section MRI system in a larger number of patients with DRS type 3, thus to provide further insight into the pathogenesis of DRS. DATA EXTRACTION: A retrospective review of medical records on ophthalmologic examination and high resolution thin-section MRI at the brainstem level and orbit was performed. A total of 31 patients who showed the typical signs of DRS type 3, including abduction and adduction deficit, globe retraction, narrowing of fissure on adduction and upshoot and/or downshoot, were included. The abducens nerve and any other extraocular muscle abnormalities discovered by MRI were noted. RESULTS: DRS was unilateral in 26 patients (84%) and bilateral in 5 patients (16%). Two out of 5 bilateral patients had DRS type 3 in the right eye and DRS type 1 in the left eye. Of the 34 affected orbits with DRS type 3 in 31 patients, the abducens nerve was absent or hypoplastic in 31 eyes (91%) and present in 3 eyes (9%). Patients with a present abducens nerve showed more limitation in adduction compared to patients with an absent abducens nerve (P = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: The abducens nerve is absent or hypoplastic in 91% of DRS type 3. Patients with a present abducens nerve showed more prominent limitation of adduction. As DRS type 3 partly share the same pathophysiology with type 1 and 2 DRS, the classification of DRS may have to be revised according to MRI findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4924812
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49248122016-07-18 Abducens Nerve in Patients with Type 3 Duane’s Retraction Syndrome Yang, Hee Kyung Kim, Jae Hyoung Hwang, Jeong-Min PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: We have previously reported that the presence of the abducens nerve was variable in patients with type 3 Duane’s retraction syndrome (DRS), being present in 2 of 5 eyes (40%) and absent in 3 (60%) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The previous study included only 5 eyes with unilateral DRS type 3. OBJECTIVES: To supplement existing scarce pathologic information by evaluating the presence of the abducens nerve using high resolution thin-section MRI system in a larger number of patients with DRS type 3, thus to provide further insight into the pathogenesis of DRS. DATA EXTRACTION: A retrospective review of medical records on ophthalmologic examination and high resolution thin-section MRI at the brainstem level and orbit was performed. A total of 31 patients who showed the typical signs of DRS type 3, including abduction and adduction deficit, globe retraction, narrowing of fissure on adduction and upshoot and/or downshoot, were included. The abducens nerve and any other extraocular muscle abnormalities discovered by MRI were noted. RESULTS: DRS was unilateral in 26 patients (84%) and bilateral in 5 patients (16%). Two out of 5 bilateral patients had DRS type 3 in the right eye and DRS type 1 in the left eye. Of the 34 affected orbits with DRS type 3 in 31 patients, the abducens nerve was absent or hypoplastic in 31 eyes (91%) and present in 3 eyes (9%). Patients with a present abducens nerve showed more limitation in adduction compared to patients with an absent abducens nerve (P = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: The abducens nerve is absent or hypoplastic in 91% of DRS type 3. Patients with a present abducens nerve showed more prominent limitation of adduction. As DRS type 3 partly share the same pathophysiology with type 1 and 2 DRS, the classification of DRS may have to be revised according to MRI findings. Public Library of Science 2016-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4924812/ /pubmed/27352171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150670 Text en © 2016 Yang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yang, Hee Kyung
Kim, Jae Hyoung
Hwang, Jeong-Min
Abducens Nerve in Patients with Type 3 Duane’s Retraction Syndrome
title Abducens Nerve in Patients with Type 3 Duane’s Retraction Syndrome
title_full Abducens Nerve in Patients with Type 3 Duane’s Retraction Syndrome
title_fullStr Abducens Nerve in Patients with Type 3 Duane’s Retraction Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Abducens Nerve in Patients with Type 3 Duane’s Retraction Syndrome
title_short Abducens Nerve in Patients with Type 3 Duane’s Retraction Syndrome
title_sort abducens nerve in patients with type 3 duane’s retraction syndrome
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4924812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27352171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150670
work_keys_str_mv AT yangheekyung abducensnerveinpatientswithtype3duanesretractionsyndrome
AT kimjaehyoung abducensnerveinpatientswithtype3duanesretractionsyndrome
AT hwangjeongmin abducensnerveinpatientswithtype3duanesretractionsyndrome